Roxye
Active Member
BBM. It's not an important detail. It was only added to further inflame the court of public opinion against these people. Media has a habit of of doing that to further turn public opinion against someone, it makes them appear worse and feeds into the public need to pillory those they feel are beneath them. JMO.
Public opinion, including mine btw, is pretty severe. Random facts that aren't true strengthens their defense not their accountability . If the article said they were starved and not well taken care of, then abandon, it would have raised as much outrage. The fleas and ticks thing was unnecessary and just lying.