Found Safe TN - Mary Catherine Elizabeth Thomas, 15, Maury County, 13 March 2017 #7

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Family of Elizabeth Thomas hold back tears while describing how Tad Cummins invaded their lives before kidnapping girl

In an interview with Good Morning America, Elizabeth Thomas’ 17-year-old sister, Sarah Thomas, tried to stop her tears from flowing as she described how Tad Cummins, 50, began making the family, especially Elizabeth, extremely uncomfortable by showing up to her home unannounced and uninvited.

<respectfully snipped>

http://www.crimeonline.com/2017/03/...s-invaded-their-lives-before-kidnapping-girl/

:pullhair: These sites that are pseudo msm sites again don't have it right. That video did not say such. BBM It was

Elizabeths "sister complained that he showed up to her workplace as recent as the Saturday that she disappeared." No mention at all of at her home.

ETA: Who owns this site? One of our crime reporters who is venturing out freelance? From Australia?
 
yes, but churches usually have to approve it. Often a group goes....like a teen group.

I don't think there is any requirement (who would make the requirement) for a church to approve of someone going to another country for the purpose of goodwill.

I can be on vacation in Coast Rica (I wish) and declare myself a missionary to everyone I meet. I doubt anyone would challenge that comment and no one would require a document.

Again, I am coming from the point of view of someone he would be telling that to.

The above is my opinion only.
 
Totally unsure of where your going here, but ok. We all have the same goals, so peace. I just thought I could offer up my knowledge as to what a mission entails.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Oh I was saying I didn't take them saying using the cover of a missionary to mean he would try and join up with a mission group. I took that as he might tell locals that is what he was doing.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
:pullhair: These sites that are pseudo msm sites again don't have it right. That video did not say such. BBM It was

Elizabeths "sister complained that he showed up to her workplace as recent as the Saturday that she disappeared." No mention at all of at her home.

It was in yesterday's podcast and stated by the family attorney
 
They have not minced words about this. From the beginning, LE has said he groomed her for sexual exploitation.

Of course, It would be good if it weren't sexual in nature. I don't think anyone at all would disagree with that. But the facts are, it IS.

Maybe the proof is within the deleted drafts and other private correspondence.
Other than a peck on the mouth and the abundant attention TC gave to ET, I haven't seen proof of actual sex acts taking place. I'm not saying they have not taken place, just not 100 percent sure.
 
This has actually been my thought all along.

I said earlier that if TC went West or even North it seems like it will take longer to find them.

I know someone quoted me asking why I felt that way and it's because from someone who lives in the North...It's not getting much attention here. At least not where I am at. I have asked many people if they have heard of the AA. And no one has. If not for WS, I'd be clueless.

If the phone pinging in Decatur was a decoy. Then it seems to be working.

While I understand the reasoning behind the Mexico theories I can't help but wonder why so much time is spent wondering about crossing borders into a foreign country yet 3/4 of the US isn't really being discussed as a possibility.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk


You have pointed out a blind spot of mine, and that is not giving more serious consideration to other areas of the US.

I am sticking with my Central America theory due to many reasons, but I should give more consideration to other areas.

The above is my opinion only.
 
There is not a big enough OMG for this case.

I have been posting the missing posters on my FB page and today I posted about 5 pictures with more info. Praying the right person sees them.

I have a bad feeling about this case but trying to bury those thoughts and be positive.
 
Maybe the proof is within the deleted drafts and other private correspondence.
Other than a peck on the mouth and the abundant attention TC gave to ET, I haven't seen proof of actual sex acts taking place. I'm not saying they have not taken place, just not 100 percent sure.
They haven't said sex acts have taken place. They said he was grooming her for that and that makes it impossible for her to make the decision to leave IMO. That is manipulation and not her decision.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
Some of that is likely the gaslighting I'm sure TC did to EC. A good gaslighter against someone that doesn't recognize that, can make the victim think they are the crazy one.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

YES. This as well as conflicting behavior are massive signs of an abusive and volatile relationship. Loving and hating, fearing and seeking. These are elements in most abusive situations. I don't understand the confusion with this. These are things that happen in abusive or manipulative "relationships." (I used quotes, because in this situation it's not a relationship. It's criminal.)
 
No, there are numerous groups that go to these areas to build homes, they take anyone, even kids go.
Hi, this is actually what I was refuting. They absolutely do not "take anyone".

Now, hiding under the PRETENSE of being a missionary is completely different.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 
:pullhair: These sites that are pseudo msm sites again don't have it right. That video did not say such. BBM It was

Elizabeths "sister complained that he showed up to her workplace as recent as the Saturday that she disappeared." No mention at all of at her home.

ETA: Who owns this site? One of our crime reporters who is venturing out freelance? From Australia?

Thank you for this. I do not watch the videos (I have April up and it is about all my computer can take). I think I am going to avoid linking that site from now on.

ETA: I alerted my post and asked the mods if the link should be removed.
 
Totally unsure of where your going here, but ok. We all have the same goals, so peace. I just thought I could offer up my knowledge as to what a mission entails.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I think both of you are correct within the context you are thinking.

I doubt they can join another mission group on the fly.

They can tell anyone that they are missionaries new to the country. In that scenario, you do not want to be around other Americans.

The above is my opinion only.
 
Hi, this is actually what I was refuting. They absolutely do not "take anyone".

Now, hiding under the PRETENSE of being a missionary is completely different.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
I knew that was what you were refuting, that is why I expounded. It wouldn't be abnormal for a 50 year old man and a 15 year old girl to be in one of those countries together saying they were there being missionaries. Hence me saying "they let anyone go, even kids".

I know several that have been to Mexico a few times, my own family included. Seeing an American man and young girl using that cover, wouldn't alert locals or anyone from the USA to contact police there.

Does that clear it up for you?

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
I've been following his Twitter as well...Lots of information. Until we find out from a mod if we can discuss it, we haven't been able to really dive into it yet.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Oh my! The twitter account!! 1 day ago! Holy cow! Is it still not approved?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
I knew that was what you were refuting, that is why I expounded. It wouldn't be abnormal for a 50 year old man and a 15 year old girl to be in one of those countries together saying they were there being missionaries. Hence me saying "they let anyone go, even kids".

I know several that have been to Mexico a few times, my own family included. Seeing an American man and young girl using that cover, wouldn't alert locals or anyone from the USA to contact police there.

Does that clear it up for you?

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Sure, so long as you don't say that they take anyone it does.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 
Oh my! The twitter account!! 1 day ago! Holy cow! Is it still not approved?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
No mod has read the other threads so I quoted one today. I'll pm them.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
 
Maybe the proof is within the deleted drafts and other private correspondence.
Other than a peck on the mouth and the abundant attention TC gave to ET, I haven't seen proof of actual sex acts taking place. I'm not saying they have not taken place, just not 100 percent sure.

No proof has been given by LE that "sex acts" have taken place. They have said he groomed and manipulated her for sexual reasons. It's semantics at this point. Why does it matter if "sex acts" took place before she was missing? Does it make him a better guy? Does it make her less in danger? More or less of a victim? She was in danger of being used by him before, during, and after she was missing. The point is, a child was groomed and manipulated for the purpose of sexual exploitation by and adult. We do not need to be privy to information that something physically took place. Why would anyone think they should have the right to those details of a victim?
 
About Kidnapping in general
Does kidnapping turn from a state offense to federal offense when state lines are crossed only?

Will crossing said lines also turn the charge from misdemeanor to felony, or are there different levels of kidnapping charges?

I hope I made some sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
193
Total visitors
318

Forum statistics

Threads
608,647
Messages
18,242,953
Members
234,404
Latest member
elainec
Back
Top