Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 157,505
Damn. I wrote a thesis. You said it all. With five words.
Gitana, your posts are a gift. I relish every single one of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn. I wrote a thesis. You said it all. With five words.
Saying you're not victim blaming, does not excuse the actual victim blaming. You ARE victim blaming.
No flaming, just being honest.
I dont agree, but I understand what you are saying. Let me put it this way. When my 16 yr old daughter worked for a friend at his restaurant, he wanted her to go to Sam's Club to shop with him. We said no because he had no business going alone with her. We set a boundary. Had she as a minor, snuck and went with him, and something happened, she would have been a victim. 100%. IMO, he would be responsible for the crime. She however, would be responsible for disobeying us and putting herself in a position she had been taught to avoid. That would be her part. I would not follow that up by saying she didnt know better than to go, etc. because of her age. It is just my opinion and how we parent. Its.whybInlock my car doors at night. If a thief steals my car- they are 100 percent responsible but I helped the thief by allowing access. Im still a victim but I played a part in the crime.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
No one is denying that ET was receptive to TC's attentiveness. How and why she was isn't a mystery. JMO
Doubt you would be thinking about responsibility if she got in a car with an unknown pervert, God forbid. It happens everywhere, though, tragically. Women willingly get in the car with, say a bf, and that's it. Happened twice recently locally, and we are even small town. You can focus on their willingness, but kinda pointless to me. Kinda missing the real issue. My opinion only.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Well, could be he was a long-suffering, optimistic soul...but also could be because mom currently isn't allowed contact with the daughter he just got back and wants to keep. One take on this move by him now might be that he is fighting to keep custody of his kids and not have them end up with social services; this break from his wife draws the line in the sand for them concerning the safety of the kids. Frankly, it is also true that he will likely fare better in a divorce situation now due to the association being made between the mother's alleged abuse and her daughter's situation with TC. The wife is in a far more defensive position, now, with her own abuse charges pending. The bargaining chips will be in his favor, so to speak. That's just an objective observation-- and like the person posting upthread, I'm not going to be assuming one parent is the villain, the other the angel, here. Their parental rights will ultimately be sorted out by examining all the evidence in a court of law.I saw that too. Funny that he just filed for divorce and filed a restraining order, if the mother had not seen the kids on a year why bother now. Jmo
Does anyone know how much her dad will sue the school district for?
A million or what?
Does anyone know how much her dad will sue the school district for?
A million or what?
I dont agree, but I understand what you are saying. Let me put it this way. When my 16 yr old daughter worked for a friend at his restaurant, he wanted her to go to Sam's Club to shop with him. We said no because he had no business going alone with her. We set a boundary. Had she as a minor, snuck and went with him, and something happened, she would have been a victim. 100%. IMO, he would be responsible for the crime. She however, would be responsible for disobeying us and putting herself in a position she had been taught to avoid. That would be her part. I would not follow that up by saying she didnt know better than to go, etc. because of her age. It is just my opinion and how we parent. Its.whybInlock my car doors at night. If a thief steals my car- they are 100 percent responsible but I helped the thief by allowing access. Im still a victim but I played a part in the crime.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Has it been said already a lawsuit is pending? A thought that immediately comes to mind is that, while he could theoretically sue them for just about any amount, collecting on a large amount is another matter. (We've 'won' financial reimbursement in a personal lawsuit in court with no actual money ever coming our way - wasted time and effort if the person or entity claims to have no money, including the money they stole from you.) I suppose suing a school system might be slightly more productive, but not sure this little county's pockets are very deep.Does anyone know how much her dad will sue the school district for?A million or what?
To make this a (somewhat) similar analogy, you have to start your premise with homeschooling her, but there was never a book in front of her. And you beat her and locked her in a basement. Also, you made her undress in front of your friends.
Then she has to be called a *advertiser censored* by teachers and students after being caught being groomed by the guy.
I'm on board with you except the bolded. Some homeschoolers have books and have a curriclulim they follow.
I'm on board with you except the bolded. Some homeschoolers have books and have a curriclulim they follow.
I believe that was in reference to ET's sister Kat saying a book was never opened in front of them. Not a statement about homeschoolers in general.
Nothing has been mentioned about it by any family members.
I think they will sue, and should. I have a feeling how much will likely be determined by the attorney more than anyone. Totally JMO, but I don't think they will sue for as much as people might assume.
And this is all I was trying to say. Going back to some of the things being said/reported, some are saying that is not the case. It's like some are trying to say she wasnt receptive, didnt pursue him etc as if her being receptive and pursuing him means she is to be blamed. she shouldnt be blamed for any of that if that is what happened. she shouldnt be blamed because she is a minor, and especially a prior victim of abuse. That wouldnt change the fact that she was receptive. And if she continues to be receptive to people that victimize her, they will do it. As she heals it will be important for her to explore that. Not to make her feel like she is to blame but for her to see how her vulnerability made her a target.
I was a victim also. I was receptive to my abuser too. I blamed myself for many years even though others said it wasnt my fault. It wasnt until I could admit that prior neglect and abuse left me broken and vulnerable that I could let that go. I was easily taken advantage of and craved the attention and "love"...I wanted to escape the abuse at home. OTOH, I feared my abuser and didnt want to be alone with him..a terrible constant tug of war. At times I would seek him out. It wasnt until I was able to see how I was lured toward that sick attention that I began to heal and choose not to be a victim. Saying I wasnt at fault didnt help much. Maybe that is just me. Having a therapist who helped me see my abusive past and how it shaped me into the perfect victim and why I was drawn in by my abuser helped me to not repeat the cycle in adulthood. There was no question I was powerless at the time because I didnt have the maturity or skills to resist even if I could have.
This is a different kind of crime...it isnt random. The criminal grooms his victim over time. There is a type(s) of person who is vulnerable. Those vulnerabilities contribute. They have to be dealt with at some point and not be downplayed and called an "age" or immaturity that the victim will probably have grown out of by the age of 18. It isnt blame..it just is. How do we heal if we cant look at the wound and what caused it?
With that...flame on all. I wasnt victim blaming but you can certainly interpret it that way if you want.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
This is a different kind of crime...it isnt random. The criminal grooms his victim over time. There is a type(s) of person who is vulnerable. Those vulnerabilities contribute. They have to be dealt with at some point and not be downplayed and called an "age" or immaturity that the victim will probably have grown out of by the age of 18. It isnt blame..it just is. How do we heal if we cant look at the wound and what caused it?
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk