It's the April 25 podcast.
I found the link you were referencing at
http://www.crimeonline.com/podcast/
From now listening to the podcast from April 25, 2017 -
Nancy with Jason Watley - at 20:20 in the feed...
What can you tell me Jason about what we are learning from the US attys office that he had actually planned to get a watercraft, a boat of some sort and leave and get to Mexico with her ...........
Whatley "Well, he did get a watercraft as I...
that's my understanding. He did get one and there was some sort of test run.
I don't know if he rented it or bought it,
I thought he purchased some sort of watercraft. And he went into Mexican waters,
that's my understanding, with her. You know again,
this is all part of this fantasy idea of his. "
(ETA: More disclaimers than a new drug on late night television with each tidbit as "I don't know","It's my understanding", "I thought", "this is all part of this fantasy")
---------------------
OK... So in my reading of this, the lawyer is ONLY referring to his understanding of what he had learned from the US atty's office in what he was speaking to.
In addition, at 21:33 in this podcast, he states that he doesn't even know what the watercraft was.
This again reinforces that he does NOT know or have knowledge from any source that they (or even he) went into Mexican waters... he prefaces and follows with "my understanding" vs. stating as a fact that they did and I do not think he has information from TC nor ET nor the feds other that the same documents as we have to come to a conclusion.
Sidenote: I noted that the lawyer said she left due to ridicule..... and now how ironic... after this past week there is new information put out there as to her private bedroom and her unicorn bedding and her blanket that she perhaps took secretly to school and syringes etc. are put out there for ridicule. SMH
:moo: :cow: