inmyhumbleopinion
#NeverGivingUp
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 5,336
- Reaction score
- 32,720
I'm a former commercial pilot (who ended up going into Criminal Justice field) and have this software that can pull up historical weather. I pulled up the weather for the spot her car was found, timelined it roughly the time it would take to drive there from when she was last seen. There was a massive storm system over the area at the time, and it didn't just "pop up" she would have seen it building as she neared the area. No person who just wanted to hike would have gone out in that. The car's location may have nothing to do with it being a popular hiking spot. No one is going to leave their car to go hiking into the middle of thunderstorms and torrential rain.
Very good point. And welcome to Websleuths!
There are a couple of things I'm wondering about:
"Officials said they think the car may have been there for a couple of weeks now. They believe the car arrived there on either April 7 or April 8.
The TBI is currently inspecting the car and said they can not comment on any potential evidence collected."
"Search ends in Monroe County, LMU student still missing"
By Lauren Davis, David Ball | Posted: Wed 11:47 PM, Apr 19, 2017 | Updated: Thu 11:26 PM, Apr 20, 2017
http://www.local8now.com/content/ne...ve-been-found-in-Monroe-County-419847593.html
I would like to why LE thinks Veronica's car got there on Apr. 7 or Apt. 8, rather than the 6th, the day she was last seen near campus. One possible reason I can think of is that is simply when the hunters remember being there and seeing it, and no one has reported seeing it on the 6th. Or do they have a specific reason to believe that the car was definitely not there on the 6th?
I also wonder about the possibility that Veronica did not drive the car there herself. I hope that if that is the case, LE has been able to obtain evidence that will help them identify the driver.