I do believe there might be a good faith basis for believing the note is in PR's handwriting based on handwriting.
Works for me.
"Hence" and "narcisstic" "journalistic" are too commonplace and vague. I use the word Hence.
I get you, but just to be fair, it's not "hence" it's the use of "and, hence," because it's a redundancy.
If the forger has been in the house before, and was there hours before as he wrote the note, using PR's writings as a guide, it might be possible.
Possible? Yeah, I suppose. But how LIKELY?
I think that the RDI have strong prima facie evidence that the handwriting is a match to PR based on the specific examples provided. Yes HOTYH is correct for the standard of a professional handwriting analysis. But I think there is a good faith rational basis to think the two handwritings are from same author.
:clap:
By way of comparison, I would agree with HOTYH that the handwriting of Rn and JR look nothing alike.
That makes three of us.
redeemed said:Oh no!!! Seems we are back to square one with you again....what happened...you were doing so well....(sigh)
He STILL is, redeemed. No need to panic.