trial day 38: the defense continues its case in chief #110

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
justice be served said:
Fellow WSers, if you want to discuss if JA is getting enough food you should do it til the cows come home which seems to be the case.

Just think of this for a moment - she majored in manipulation - and seems this talent of hers has even extended to this forum.

I have been within 10 feet of her in the courtroom and she is not even close to anorexic. IMHO, she's just playing everyone - and I mean everyone.
Click to expand...

Well we have to have something to complain about before court starts...if it starts...today. :seeya:

I see now we're on a peanut butter tangent. I don't like peanut butter! But as JM would say "Did I ask you if you liked peanut butter?"

I think we're all going a bit stir crazy!

Mel
 
Liebchenmutti said:
When I lived in NYC & PA we said "you guys"--and there were variants on this like "youse guys" or "what are youse doin'?"

Now it's only "y'all"
Click to expand...

Same here-I was born in NYS, and where I grew up we had "cricks" full of water-hadn' t heard creek pronounced that way til we moved to Texas.
I had a few quick vocabulary lessons from a native when we moved here-tanks and ice houses and fixin' and yonder to name a few...Y'all know what I mean.:seeya:
 
Just giving her food without authorization would immediately have people talking about conspiracy theories of what she is putting in the food or who is 'slipping' her stuff, that is why it all has to be approved by the judge and jail. If she is not eating I agree they should force her with tubes to not allow her to further manipulate by losing weight.

She probably loves going on the computer and reading all the forums about herself
 
KarmicLaw said:
I don't know if anyone has seen this yet, but it looks like Juan's cross is going to be AMAZING....

http://www./show/n_1rjf5h9
Click to expand...
:what:
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:



O
hoover-dam-directions.jpg
 
Turnadot said:
Hahaha....we are losing our everlovin' minds.
Click to expand...

Speaking of losing MY mind, I remember hearing that court was ????? today?
I think it's a short day? I am lost peeps. What time is court scheduled today that is "iffin" Jodi "FEELS" up to it and all :rolleyes:
 
Potato chips in peanut butter? A pickle and ketchup tortilla?
Folks, I'm only going to say this one time. Some things are just downright unAmerican and I don't want to see any gloating about them on this board.:floorlaugh:
 
LambChop said:
She gets what appears to be a small round loaf of fresh baked multi-grained bread. Similar to the kind you get when you get served bread in a restaurant that serves 4. Or similar to a bread bowl you put soup in. Too much bread for breakfast, that is for sure. She also can order from the commissary, things such as candy bars, crackers, chips, dips, powerbars, etc. It is not as if she can't get enough to eat or a variety of additional food. Their allotment per week is $40.00 so she could buy enough snacks to last her a week with that amount and still have enough left over to buy some personal items. jmo
Click to expand...

Yes, I think she has plenty of opportunities. She just isn't taking them. It is what it is, she just has to live with her choices. IMHO

Kelly
 
Melanie said:
Amazing! Snipped from article:

Remember that during the pre-trial hearing on August 8, 2011, LaVoilette exposed yet another Arias lie by stating that Jodi told her Travis masturbating to pictures of young boys on his laptop - directly contradicted Jodi's previous story of seeing them on his bed. This sent Martinez into a frenzy where he immediately requested to see ALL of LaVoilette's documents & notes, which would likely expose yet more lies to therapists/psychologists who evaluated her.

So JA went from saying TA was on his laptop, and then it turned into pictures on the bed where 1 magically flew in front of her.

No wonder JM is being so quiet at the moment ;)

MOO

Mel
Click to expand...


I'm guessing the jurors will treat that "testimony" accordingly. :flush:
 
RadarLuv said:
again, I even went as far as to pull it up. It is something I NEVER would have noticed I said until it was pointed out that I said it. Then I thought they were crazy and denied I had said that. Now I notice it ever time. No one else does, though. And I am not heavy on the southern accent either.

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=20001120


November 20, 2000

might could (double modal)

David Rubin wrote:

In this neck of the woods, one not infrequently encounters the following construction:

A: Can you help me clean the gutters?
B: I might could help you out.
I've encountered two opinions on this "double subjunctive" (might could). The first says that it's just plain illiterate and incorrect. The second says that it's a survival in the American South of a usage that was once much more widely spread. Do you think y'all might could cast some more light on the subject? [David is writing from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.]

Well, for starters, might could isn't a double subjunctive; it's a double modal. Modals belong to a category of auxiliary verbs that includes would, ought, must, should, and have to. The subjunctive is a mode (a.k.a. "mood") of a verb, that uses the bare infinitive in many verbs in the present tenses (If he be great, let him do something to prove it), but has only one form, were, in past and conditional constructions (Would that Caesar were great!/If only Caesar were great!). The other modes are the familiar indicative (Caesar is great), and the imperative (Be great, Ceasar!/Let Caesar be great!). The vocative is also usually classed as a mode (O Caesar!). Modals took over the larger role that the subjunctive used to play, so that may be what's confusing you (or your source).

Anyhow.

The use of the double modal is definitely not "illiterate," but rather typical of regional dialect. It just happens to be largely, if not exclusively, confined to spoken language or reported speech, which says more about the intolerance of dialectal forms in "standard" written English than it does about the education level of the speaker. It's generally true that more educated Southerners tend to avoid this construction, but that's due to a prejudice of perception, not to any inherent inferiority of the use.

In fact, I doubt whether the most common double modals, "might need to" and "might've used to," would clang in most English speakers' ears. However, this dialectal use is indeed mostly concentrated in the South and South Midland, according to the Dictionary of American Regional English, which also gives the following complete list of actually occurring forms, which I think is surprisingly varied:
Click to expand...

I sometimes am guilty of saying "used to could" do something. I don't know where this comes from, but it comes so easily to my tongue.
 
Sweetiemom said:
Same here-I was born in NYS, and where I grew up we had "cricks" full of water-hadn' t heard creek pronounced that way til we moved to Texas.
I had a few quick vocabulary lessons from a native when we moved here-tanks and ice houses and fixin' and yonder to name a few...Y'all know what I mean.:seeya:
Click to expand...

Oh yes--"cricks!" I used to get teased as a child when we'd visit my grandparents in TX (we lived in NY) & I could never understand them! Once my cousin kept insisting she had a "whale" in her back yard & I was so angry & telling her she was lying. Yeah--turns out it was a 'well!' And there were tanks on the farm for the cows. Just don't let anyone take you sniper hunting.
 
Southern_Meadow said:
No, it's not just you. I think it's creepy, too. Dr. Drew has talked about it a few times on his show. He says Jodi is "mirroring" Willmott and has probably been doing this her whole life with various people. If I have to hear Jean C say that the two of them have "really bonded" one more time, I will rip my hair out. I don't give a flip who she's bonded with; this trial isn't about that, it's about justice for Travis.
Click to expand...

jc is too dramatic and touchy feel imo. her descriptions are syrup sweet. but i adore beth k. jmo
 
Schuby said:
Potato chips in peanut butter? A pickle and ketchup tortilla?
Folks, I'm only going to say this one time. Some things are just downright unAmerican and I don't want to see any gloating about them on this board.:floorlaugh:
Click to expand...

Schuby is right. PB sammich with CHEETOS for crunch. That's American!
 
EquallyDivided said:
However, I once tried crunchy. I felt like I was eating pop-rocks and we all know that there is only one reason to have THOSE one hand ...
Click to expand...

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

Day before last I ate a lollipop. Not a Tootsie Pop, but a pop nonetheless....not once did I ever get the urge to put it um..... somewhere else :floorlaugh:
 
Dmacky said:
Speaking of losing MY mind, I remember hearing that court was ????? today?
I think it's a short day? I am lost peeps. What time is court scheduled today that is "iffin" Jodi "FEELS" up to it and all :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
IIRC, today is a short day and starts at the usual time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 115 more.
Total: 324 (members: 116, guests: 208)

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
208
Total visitors
324
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,571
Messages
18,255,708
Members
234,693
Latest member
Jarie_401
Back
Top