I was thinking the exact same thing. Would have been a perfect set-up. But Juan missed the opportunity. He disappoints me a lot. Not a good day so far.
I'm also really tired of these hypotheticals to which Willmot continuously objects to. FFS, don't mischaracterize testimony. If you believe a witness said something, have a transcript of the testimony with you and THEN question the witness instead of risk slowing down the trial with constant approaches. Juan doesn't have the memory to cross examine the way he does. He needs notes, more importantly TRANSCRIPTS. Otherwise, objections, approaches, objections!
This was posted by ammonitidia.
I think at this point if you don't think Juan has had an exceptional day then you are just determined to be negative.
He HAS to talk in hypotheticals otherwise it is hearsay, unless of course he's given an open door when lav gives contradictory info. No he cannot use transcripts either, as far as I know. This jury isn't stupid.they know these aren't just hypotheticals. They were there when freeman and Lisa testified. They the testimony is NOT being mischaracterized. Which is kind of why the judge is telling them to use their judgment and recall previous testimony. Just because laviolette says it isn't true doesn't mean they didn't testify and say what Martinez said they did.