trial day 45: the defense continues its case in chief #136

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
i want yes or no questions.

i can't listen to alyce's BS anymore.

:furious::furious::furious:
 
I can't stand how ALV uses her hands, IMO that is a descriptive sales technique. I see right through that.
 
She doesn't have any friends, and basically had no relationship with her family

Thank you! Your comment is just making it more obvious that she COULD have spoken with tons of people who love Travis and could have told her exACTly who Travis Alexander was and who Jodi Arias is.
 
hA253751B
 
Amazing what 'memory' she suddenly 'exhibits'....;)
All these details
 
OMG. She just won't stop. I can't believe how absolutely, completely blind AVL is to the temperature of these questions. She's driving a truck over this jury and their sensibilities, backing up and driving over them again.
 
Donna Fisher ‏@forestfox56 27s

Who else noticed when #JodiArias stood up for the jury that she didnt have her glasses on, and quickly reached for and put them on!!

---
 
Q: "Is it common for women in abusive relationships to snap and commit violent acts against long standing perpetrators?"
 
OH GOD STRIKE ME DOWN RIGHT NOW. Everybody lies...the Bishop, the Devil, the Killer!
 
:furious:
Hoping for thoughtful snark from jurors. Please some juror, please ask if Jodi was not allowed alone with Darryl's child. Why defense is bringing up Darryl's child? Has Jodi ever harmed a child? animal? started fires? bed wetter?

Now that is a scary idea. I don't believe she was however. I know she kicked their dog once and shut a cat she was cat sitting for in a room for a week or so. Nothing about arson though. But she was still young in 08.

Who knows what heights she may have accomplished if left to her own devises . :furious:
 
I really doubt that the jury wanted more Travis-trashing in answer to their questions. ALV is using this as yet another opportunity to defend Jodi and defame Travis. Shame on her! :furious:
 
She shouldn't have mentioned the married woman who's husband was addicted to *advertiser censored* because I think it's too easy to work out who that was which isn't fair.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
194
Total visitors
274

Forum statistics

Threads
608,469
Messages
18,239,870
Members
234,384
Latest member
Sleuth305
Back
Top