I think he was excused from jury duty because he mentioned to the arresting officer that he was a juror in the jodi arias trial. Even a DUI remember is considered innocent until proven guilty.
I think he was excused from jury duty because he mentioned to the arresting officer that he was a juror in the jodi arias trial. Even a DUI remember is considered innocent until proven guilty.
Maybe there's nothing to tell. Kid from nowhereville, going nowhere, etc.
I'm sure her mother or other family member will reveal all in an upcoming book published after JA's conviction.:floorlaugh:
The Law of Destruction.
When Jodi was arrested, with the 9mm and two knives packed in books....was the car rental in her name, what color if known and did she drive 90 miles again to rent?
I have a feeling it was done at that point because of all the blood there and because she would have been frantic at that point that he might actually be able to get away or that he was about to drag the fight onto the carpet, which was not part of her plan and she wanted the blood to only be contained in the bathroom. Also the picture of her dragging him back where it clearly shows blood flowing in a waterfall fashion (sorry I don't mean to be crude). What really gets me though is that is Wilmott really trying to say that that blood flowing could really be because of the gunshot wound and not the neck?? That is just absurd, if I knew a throat had been slit and there was a gunshot would, I would clearly be able to reason that the blood in that picture is from the throat.
Sometime between January and May 28 of 2008 JA traded in The Law of Attraction for The Law of Distraction.
This enabled her to surprise and murder Travis, attempting alibis and cover-ups in the 'blowback'.
Then, on July 15, 2011, exactly three years to the day following her arrest, JA then swapped out The Law of Distraction, replacing it with The Law of Destruction.
Her defense would be to destroy Travis Alexander yet again, trashing his character and reputation, while inflicting the maximum possible mental and emotional cruelty upon his surviving family and friends, most of whom by this time had utterly rejected her.
Here is the legal document ":deal: in which she memorialized these threats which she has continued to make good on throughout this trial: http://grahamwinch.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/jodiariasngfile.pdf
:stormingmad::maddening::notgood::furious:
I take it a step further- there is nothing that would have stopped her from killing him. God forbid, even if he had consented to marry her, she would have continued the same psycho stalking, jealous behavior. He could innocently talk to another woman and she would have destroyed him in a psychopathic rage.
The only way he could have saved himself was to kill her first. She was a factory defect on a collision course with murder.
No doubt....i'm sure there will be a few books floating around. :facepalm: Hopefully at least one will have the truth in it.
I am just wondering why everyone thinks she shot him last?
Why bring a gun if you are going to use a knife and us the gun at the last minute?
Why steal the grandfather's gun if you are not going to us it till the last minute?
None of this makes sense.
She stole the gun knowing exactly what she was going to do. Shoot him in the shower and get out.
It did not work out like she planned. Thankfully, because if the gunshot worked the way she wanted, we would not be here now.
She would be scott free.
I listen to these trials everyday. Unfortunately it is my job.
I think he was excused from jury duty because he mentioned to the arresting officer that he was a juror in the jodi arias trial. Even a DUI remember is considered innocent until proven guilty.
I have a feeling it was done at that point because of all the blood there and because she would have been frantic at that point that he might actually be able to get away or that he was about to drag the fight onto the carpet, which was not part of her plan and she wanted the blood to only be contained in the bathroom. Also the picture of her dragging him back where it clearly shows blood flowing in a waterfall fashion (sorry I don't mean to be crude). What really gets me though is that is Wilmott really trying to say that that blood flowing could really be because of the gunshot wound and not the neck?? That is just absurd, if I knew a throat had been slit and there was a gunshot would, I would clearly be able to reason that the blood in that picture is from the throat.
Young children are quite different than a 185 lb. man. IIRC, Darlie did not stab them 29 times either.
No doubt....i'm sure there will be a few books floating around. :facepalm: Hopefully at least one will have the truth in it.
I still think the knife was a hunting knife. I have really good kitchen knives, and I keep them sharp. And I have to struggle to cut up a chicken. In my common experience, kitchen knives would make inflicting the kind of injuries JA inflicted on TA extremely difficult. I have to deduce she brought along a hunting knife. More premeditation.
Thank you. So, clearly after Samuels and his self help book arrived and shortly before ALV (August 2011 was it and there had been 6 DV people prior to visit ?).
What Law do you think might be next ?
I'm really not sure. Part of me questions whether she was even going to try to get him to take her to Cancun. She had a LOT of evidence of premeditation, as you said. Why go to all of those lengths if you aren't sure what you're going to do? But, maybe it was 'better safe than sorry'?
For the most part, I think she knew Travis was done with her and she decided he had to die. Cancun or not. Because none of her tricks would work anymore. He was on to her. He saw the real Jodi. She couldn't hide anymore.
It's these little things that we'll probably never know that drive me wacky. :scared:
I don't even want to think about it because I thought the same thing with FCA and we all know how that turned out. The only thing that got me through that trial was the hope that I'd get to see her face when the jury found her guilty and her world ended. Now she's sunbathing and vlogging on an island somewhere (not really, don't know or care where she is.)
If JA isn't found guilty of 1st degree I think this is it for me following these cases. I am way too emotionally invested!