Really?
Oscar is a runner, not a crime scene tactician or logician.
if I understand your query there, you are saying that Oscar hires a lawyer on the basis that this particular lawyer is a crime scene tactitian or logician??
There is no reason whatsoever to assume that Roux is any or either of these things.. he is a practioner of the law.
Oscar is a lot more than merely a runner.. he is the perpetrator of a shooting that killed a woman in his own home , in his own bathroom/toilet , this same woman being one who was sharing his bed not more than a minute beforehand..Oscar himself is the expert, and the only expert on how this happened.. I happen to think he isnt telling the truth about it, but it is a certain fact, that Oscar knows exactly how Reeva came to be dead on the tiles. Various forensic procedures will exapand on how it happened.. and it will be then plain how it happened.. Why it happened will rest, to a great deal on forensic science, and the weight given to the witnesses who heard the event.. hearing and seeing the event seem , from Roux's angle, under Oscars instruction , are two completely and irreconcilable matters.
So Oscar just isnt a runner.
Oscar is his own main witness.. Roux isnt. Roux acts under Oscars instructions as to what went on that night.. Roux wasnt there.. whatever angle Roux tells the court is entirely and absolutely under the instructions he has received from his client.
Oscar hasnt hired Roux for his ( as yet undemonstrated skills ) crime scene tactics.
I am concerned that Oscar isnt getting the best representation , actually.
So far, the only alternative explanation Roux has given ( under Oscars instruction) is the witnesses, each witness EVERY witness, one after the other, is mistaken.
One witness, maybe. .but 7?? Seven witness in a row, all mistaken?? Roux has, so far, promised evidence of Oscars capacity to scream like a woman in extreme distress, not just any woman but the SAME woman the witness heard screaming.. That and some email Sam sent is all that Roux has promised to lay out on the table in Oscars defence.
Frankly. this I doubt he can produce. However, he asserted to a witness that he had tests done, and the results of this test would be put before the court. Should he , by golly. produce an Oscar womanish scream, the original witness who heard the two voices will be called back to the stand to give his/her estimation of the relativity of Oscars scream and what he/she heard.. will they match?? Because they have to match.. not just any old scream will do.
lets see.
