jilly
Registered User
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2004
- Messages
- 7,989
- Reaction score
- 53
Pfft. I have just made a mental note to never argue with you! LOL!!!
Thank you for that, something I was not aware of.
:floorlaugh: You and me both! lol
Pfft. I have just made a mental note to never argue with you! LOL!!!
Thank you for that, something I was not aware of.
For the sake of clarity, "Do no harm" is not the first rule.
Or the second.
Or third.
A Modern Version of the Hippocratic Oath
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=20909
http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/greekmedicine/f/HippocraticOath.htm
Pfft. I have just made a mental note to never argue with you! LOL!!!
Thank you for that, something I was not aware of.
The thing is, if this panel, and God help Oscar if it does, finds that he has an extremely debilitating mental defect, and/or illness, he will be kept as a State patient in the locked ward for as long as it is deemed necessary until he is either sane enough to conduct his instructions to his attorney, or so unwell he cannot be released in the foreseeable future outside the confines of the treating hospital. And that could mean 10 years, 15, even 20 years of mandatory treatment, whatever form it takes, .. regular evaluations, mandatory therapy, mandatory observation.. oh dear.
it makes prison look like a teddy bears picnic in comparison.
Women that have insecurities of their own would be my guess. Any other woman would be able to see right through him.
Great first post, however the "red light" was actually blue. :welcome: and hope to read more of your posts in the future!
Pfft. I have just made a mental note to never argue with you! LOL!!!
Thank you for that, something I was not aware of.
This is a criminal psychiatric evaluation that is to take place in an environment dedicated to such. It is remotely similar to OPs two visits with Dr. V, but these mental health professionals have a different mandate than the soft conversations that occurred in Dr. V's office. She refused to even look at the court transcript that Roux gave her. Geez!
I did not realize that some folks saw Mr. Nel's questions as being so harmful to OPs psyche, I really didn't. But what it boils down to is other people, mental health professionals, most of them having full time careers assessing criminals, are going to politely ask OP some questions. Lots and lots of questions, all related to OP and the fact that he killed. And they will do this for 30 days from 5:00AM-9:00PM everyday. There will be lots of forms and standard tests for him to complete, but most of his time will be spent interacting with these folks. But on the bright side, maybe he will charm them in to feeling sorry for him and they won't ask him any hard probing questions, and certainly not any follow up questions.
My amateur diagnosis of that particular syndrome rests heavily on Hybristophilia and the Dunning -Kruger effect.. and also, my dog agrees with those conclusions, which makes it almost unanimous in my household...
Hybristophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
and...
DunningâKruger effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hey Trooper. :seeya:
Speaking of your dog, what was the outcome of the possum encounter? ?
Or maybe Nel could rack him. But the docs definitely can't -- at least nowadays
What is up with women falling all over themselves for this guy? He may be handsome, and opposite to that he is disfigured. Some women despise a man that has killed, while at the same time they love that he seems boyish and needs attention to soothe him? :weird:
possum 1 , dog 0.. happens every time.
Hmm I wasn't thinking necessarily of electric shock therapy though I can't say I'd be opposed to it, it has come a long way, more the jog his memory kind like what Nel did in the courtroom. Certainly they will have pics other than inkblots at their disposal?
Hmm I wasn't thinking necessarily of electric shock therapy though I can't say I'd be opposed to it, it has come a long way, more the jog his memory kind like what Nel did in the courtroom. Certainly they will have pics other than inkblots at their disposal?
You think they'll show him crime scene photos? I honestly don't know whether they can/would/should do that.
His own witness ,Prof Vorster has already stated that the disorder she believes he has is treatable and should have been diagnosed and treated for a very very long time. That is not the issue.
It is not the responsibility OR the task of the panel to treat, or manage whatever disorder they may find. Or not. . he would be referred onwards. The panel itself is not formed to the view to treat Oscar's disorder, should he have one. This is the mistake that is being made. Their job is an impartial evaluation. And evaluation ONLY. nothing more. They have no mandate to treat Oscar.. has Oscar expressed a wish to you that he wants to be treated?? Absolutely not. Their impartiality would be compromised should they suddenly become his counsellors. This irrational thinking is probably due to a misreading of the statute, or the concept of court appointed evaluation. Keep in mind, this is not at the request of Oscar. far from.
For clarity: Today it is called ECT - Electroconvulsive Therapy
Yes it is different. It does not cause the old fashioned "grand mal" seizures of the past. In most patients there may be a small twitching of a leg. They do still use the mouthguard during the procedure, by the way. Not so the patient doesn't "swallow their tongue". It is so they don't bite their tongue.
It is mainly used to treat resistant clinical depression. As far as memory, ECT is more likely to impair memory than to "jog it".
As for "racking", I don't think that was ever used as a psychiatric treatment. But immersing the patient into ice baths was. Oh yes.
You think they'll show him crime scene photos? I honestly don't know whether they can/would/should do that.
I know that psychiatrists never racked (or at least I don't think they did). I was comparing abhorent criminal justice practices to the cited abhorrent mental illness practices. Quid pro quo