Not only did Masipa talk about the bathroom window, amazingly, it even formed part of the basis for believing OP.
As I mentioned in my previous post, there didn’t seem to be much that she didn’t believe about his story.
"Evidence shows that at time he fired shots at toilet door, Mr Pistorius believed the deceased was in the bedroom, the judge says. This belief was communicated to a number of people shortly after the incident, she added.
The judge said there is "nothing in the evidence to suggest that Mr Pistorius' belief was not genuinely entertained". She cites reasons including the bathroom window being open, and the toilet door being shut.
"In the present case in his own version, the accused suspected that an intruder had entered through the bathroom window. He… [said] he genuinely, though erroneously, believed that his life and that of the deceased was in danger," the judge said.
"In the present case the accused is the only person who can say what his state of mind was when he fired the shots that killed the deceased," the judge said."
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/1409...ct-judge-thokozile-masipa-reading-her-verdict
Oscar opened that window after he shot and killed Reeva in my opinion--, he did so to back up his Intruder version - to give impression and cover himself for his pathetic story that he had reason to fire at that door because an Intruder had come in through the window. How can that Judge believe that just because when the police arrived that the window was open, that it couldn't have been Oscar that might just have opened it ???
We also know that he had time to tamper with the Crime Scene before the Standers and Stipp arrived at his house and he went upstairs while they were there. This was before the police had even arrived - so Oscar had plenty of opportunities to go upstairs and move things, like 'opening the bathroom window'. I can't believe the Judge didn't seem to think Oscar had a reason to lie about such things.