Greater Than
Retired Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 3,948
- Reaction score
- 75
first shot... maybe at this point arguable the intention was to shoot, but not kill. [panic/startle/scare/injure etc]
more difficult to argue away the intention to kill didn't then emerge... after shot one... or after shot two... or after shot three?
into that space, do you think four shots is not an intention to kill? how many more would it take for clear, provable intention, 6? 8? 10?
it also interests me that if there was no intention to kill, what was the thinking/intention around ceasing to shoot?
Even OP's own defense team knew four rounds indicate clear intent. That's why Roux tried to argue double taps.