minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,152
- Reaction score
- 2,110
That's an interesting point.
"The Oscar Pistorius trial – and the language Apartheid it reveals
But when we consider what this really tells us about our country, the answer actually lies in language.
There was simply no question that this trial would be heard in any language other than English. Right from the very beginning, it was simply assumed by everyone that English it would be. And so it was proven. And yet, no one actually acting in this trial has English as their first language. Judge Masipa doesn’t; both Roux and Gerrie Nel seem to speak Afrikaans as a first language. And yet English it is.
It is a strange quirk of our country that very few people have English as their first language, but it is fast removing Afrikaans from our courtrooms. This means that very few people will be tried in the language that speaks to their heart. And while the proceedings are interpreted, we all know that that can come with associated problems. Involving paranoid schizophrenia, sign language, and booing."
http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opin...e-language-apartheid-it-reveals/#.VEfsOlcgues
Thanks for looking that up. While all the participants may be comfortable speaking English, it still is no substitute for one's native and primary language. I think this quirk leads to some confusing results.