nodamselindistress
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 2,382
- Reaction score
- 25,846
Notice he does not ever mention what MGibb's motive would have been?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Notice you left "reasonable" out of that title!I'm going to title this closing argument: "Scrounging for doubt."
Yeah, because I think he'll take any shred (a missing piece or open question, not a necessary element to the crimes) and amplify it into that.Notice you left "reasonable" out of that title!
Prior might be driving this jury into exactly that!I would love if we got a guilty verdict tonight!
The prosecutors haven’t stopped conferring with each other. I bet they’ve come up with so many ways to discredit him.JP better wrap this up pretty soon because I can’t watch much more of it
SBM. Everyone except Lori?He is throwing everyone under the bus --Look there, not here
They don’t really need to discredit what he’s saying - the longer he goes on the more absurd he getsThe prosecutors haven’t stopped conferring with each other. I bet they’ve come up with so many ways to discredit him.
Shut up Prior.