photographer4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 4,417
- Reaction score
- 25,442
dbm.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, he is guilty because he was there and matched the video description and has confessed 60+ times and counting.But nobody cares. Because he was arrested. So he's guilty.
IMO MOO
It says in the description 18 to 40. How'd you settle on BB saying 20 year old? What videoed statement are you referring to?It’s in this response that refers to the videotaped statement. It was also used for age range used on the poster for YBG. Also in several Franks memos.
View attachment 524550
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
The one in the link.It says in the description 18 to 40. How'd you settle on BB saying 20 year old? What videoed statement are you referring to?
Oh so this is all information from FM...very salty source. I'll wait to hear BB testify.It was linked and screenshotted above but will repost for anyone else who is wanting to read for themselves.
Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
View attachment 524565
Snipped by me for focus...I supplied the link to the filing several times. I’m assuming that people are asking for links because they want to read the filing for themselves.
The information that I was trying to get across is that there are video recordings of the statements from these witnesses that the court would be able to watch and confirm what the witness actually said in their statements. We have also discussed several times that lawyers are not allowed to lie to the court. Considering the defense supplied the court with a copy of these videotaped recordings to confirm, it would be ridiculous for the defense to lie about statements made on the video recordings.
I disagreeEven if that is the case, it doesn't give the feeling that she is as unbiased as she'd have people believe imo.
You knew that it was coming from the defense. So why even ask for the link if you don’t believe anything they say anyways?Oh so this is all information from FM...very salty source. I'll wait to hear BB testify.
What was the lie in chambers ?Snipped by me for focus...
"We have also discussed several times that lawyers are not allowed to lie to the court."
At the least one defense attorney has outright lied to the court, in the judge's chambers to boot.
It's my personal opinion that the DT have also lied repeatedly in the FMs. There are probably many lies of omission also that have contributed to the circus this D has laid before us. AJMO
Not to put words in another member’s mouth but I suspect it came from here: Adobe AcrobatIt says in the description 18 to 40. How'd you settle on BB saying 20 year old? What videoed statement are you referring to?
He sure was open about it. He gave the time as the same time the young girls saw him and he admitted seeing them.Just wondering, why would he LIE about having been there? For whatever reason, he didn't care if DD or LE knew he'd been at the bridge that day initially. He was open about that. Being in the general area doesn't make him an offender or even suspicious imo.
Per the same doc, she said the same thing 2 years later to Le. And she told the sketch artist the YBG sketch was 10/10 accurate.Oh so this is all information from FM...very salty source. I'll wait to hear BB testify.
Well, we aren’t all going to agree on everything all the time so no worries.I disagree
FMs and all their support filings have been shown to be unreliable, unsubstantial. The court has denied them all without hearing. MOThe one in the link.
I did not ask for a link.You knew that it was coming from the defense. So why even ask for the link if you don’t believe anything they say anyways?
It feels like we could all save a lot of time and annoyance if you guys would stop continually asking for links for the same defense documents just to disregard the information because it’s from the same defense documents. You don’t believe the information anyways so why even ask. Just ignore it and scroll on.
The BR was stepping down as RA's attorney.What was the lie in chambers ?
Are you able to provide any proof to support your claim that the Franks are filled with lies?FMs and all their support filings have been shown to be unreliable, unsubstantial. The court has denied them all without hearing. MO
So you don’t think he told DD what he was wearing that day?He sure was open about it. He gave the time as the same time the young girls saw him and he admitted seeing them.
Years later is when he told them what he was wearing, exactly the same as what BG was photographed as wearing. He put himself on the bridge and was seen there right as the girls were approaching. It's almost like he wanted to unburden himself, MO
It was only after seeing the discovery of all these things that he (well his lawyers, for we've not heard a peep from RA directly) changed the time...very conveniently.
AJMO
Can you elaborate ? The lie was that Rozzi would step down ? Could you point me to the page and line where this lie occurs?The BR was stepping down as RA's attorney.