GUILTY TRIAL OF CHAD DAYBELL CHARGED WITH MURDER OF JJ VALLOW, TYLEE RYAN AND TAMMY DAYBELL #7

[Cindizzi]

Huh. I wonder what that means.

- The jurors have a question?
- A juror is unable to continue, and an alternate needs chosen?
- Something else?

All I can think of from watching other trials is that perhaps the Jury has a question for the Judge.. or they are requesting to see a video that’s in evidence again.. They would definitely go on the record for something like that. But why not say The Jury has a question.!?
JMO

 

[LaborDayRN]

I'm sitting on pins and needles!!!!

 

[BUF]

The CourtTV deliberations clock has stopped

3 hrs 53 minutes

 

[Cindizzi]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1796214373771526580

 

[JessieJess]

Huh. I wonder what that means.

- The jurors have a question?
- A juror is unable to continue, and an alternate needs chosen?
- Something else?

Really, really hoping that whatever this is, it doesn’t somehow “benefit” Chad. Too early to be a hung jury, right?

 

[Diddian]

All I can think of from watching other trials is that perhaps the Jury has a question for the Judge.. or they are requesting to see a video that’s in evidence again.. They would definitely go on the record for something like that. But why not say The Jury has a question.!?
JMO

Hope we don’t start seeing jurors disqualified for cause like in the case against Michelle Troconis (although I believe those disqualifications occurred before deliberations began).

 

[Cindizzi]

What the What?? ( closed hearing )

JMO

 

[BUF]

10:17 a.m. We were just told this will be a closed hearing. We were asked to leave the courtroom and there will not be a livestream.

 

[Cindizzi]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1796216145185526211

 

[wnk]

View attachment 506870

https://twitter.com/x/status/1796214373771526580

Huh. "Closing" the hearing and kicking out the media makes me think it may be a potential issue with a juror -- that the judge needs to decide whether or not to let them continue deliberations or assign an alternate. If there was a possibility a juror needed to be removed at this stage, I assume they'd want to protect the juror's identity and shield them from potential public backlash.

ETA: "Potential issue" in this case possibly being:

• A juror realized some connection with someone in the case that they weren't aware of before
• A juror expressed some strong prejudicial bias
• A juror refuses to follow proper deliberation procedures or follow court instructions

 

[Diddian]

Huh. "Closing" the hearing and kicking out the media makes me think it may be a potential issue with a juror -- that the judge needs to decide whether or not to let them continue deliberations or assign an alternate. If there was a possibility a juror needed to be removed at this stage, I assume they'd want to protect the juror's identity and shield them from potential public backlash.

I’m thinking the same; however, could it also be that the jury is asking to look again at some evidence that was not displayed for the public in the trial? Would the judge close the hearing for that?

 

[nodamselindistress]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1796216145185526211

Just under 6 hours deliberation time? Not what I am seeing on the CTV clock, more like just under 4 hours.

 

[JessieJess]

If Chad somehow gets acquitted (I don’t think he will, but I’m nervous about the current hearing), he’ll be able to visit Lori in prison. This can’t happen!!

 

[Cindizzi]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1796213410700632377

I listened toJL’s YouTube live and he said Nate is texting him from the hallway. Nothing new yet

 

[Niner]

link to Nate's notes

WATCH LIVE | LIVE UPDATES: Judge holds procedural hearing in Chad Daybell case as jury deliberates - East Idaho News

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE TRIAL LIVE Please excuse the typos. These are live updates from the courtroom. 10:17 a.m. We were just told this will be a closed hearing. We were asked to leave the courtroom and there will not be a livestream. 10:11 a.m. John Prior just walked in. 10:07 a.m. Prosecutors...

www.eastidahonews.com

 

[wnk]

I’m thinking the same; however, could it also be that the jury is asking to look again at some evidence that was not displayed for the public in the trial? Would the judge close the hearing for that?

The only things that they were privy to that the general public was not were the graphic postmortem images. It's possible the jury requested to see them again, but I'd think they'd have paper copies of those already and wouldn't need to have the judge and legal teams there for that.

 

[Cindizzi]

Just under 6 hours deliberation time? Not what I am seeing on the CTV clock, more like just under 4 hours.

Did they deliberate for 2 hours last night?

 

[Alkali13]

Hope we don’t start seeing jurors disqualified for cause like in the case against Michelle Troconis (although I believe those disqualifications occurred before deliberations began).

They all were dismissed before deliberations, all fairly early.

 

[Diddian]

Did they deliberate for 2 hours last night?

I think the verdict clocks reflect 2 hours for last night and 2 more since deliberations continued today (up until they stopped for this closed hearing).

 

[Niner]

I think the verdict clocks reflect 2 hours for last night and 2 more since deliberations continued today (up until they stopped for this closed hearing).

Yes - approx 2 hours yesterday they said - and the next almost 2 is for today.