Hear, hear, and only to add that conversely, Ross Harris's alleged crimes do not absolve LE from the responsibility of honoring their oaths to protect the rights of the accused.
---
And jumping off your post, what I find truly ironic is that those who believe LE is on trial don't seem to understand that STODDARD, the lead investigator, is the person who has virtually single handedly been responsible for LE witnesses being demolished on the stand and having their own credibility undermined and ethics challenged. He's thrown his own team under the bus.
We actually DO UNDERSTAND, that being said you have mentioned the shortcomings of LE in EVERY single post. We get it.
Again, not a lawyer but do believe the judicial system is set up to take care of these issues one way or another. JMO
No, actually, most of my posts have nothing to do with LE. Perhaps you're just interpreting them that way?
And, no, it seems you've missed my point entirely. I usually resist trotting out the trite and usually defensive "I am a supporter of LE " line, because I feel no need to apologize for asking that LE be held accountable, and I feel no need to try to appease folks who don't share that sentiment.
In this case I'll make an exception to make my point crystal clear. I have friends who are cops, and who police in a city considered one of the top 10 most dangerous cities in the US of A.
I know from having cops as friends that cops are the first to feel critical of and contempt for bad cops, dirty cops, unethical cops. Those cops put good cops in danger in a hundred different ways, which can and does endanger civilians as well.
Those good cops, including my friends, are no more "anti-LE" than I am. Enough.