Yes, it's a very interesting revelation isn't it. Yes when you Skype someone you can talk to them as you see them too. You are right, hopefuly they know who was sky[ped through an IP address or other means and they can verify if it was indeed Sarai that person was talking to. I think wether or not it was Sarai or not, that this mystery is being very quickly unravelled and authorities will find out the truth very soon indeed .
Abc news website has breaking headline about police responding to suicide bombing at US embassy in Turkey. No idea if this could be related somehow, but thought it was worth noting. I'm on my cell so hard to link.
There is a recklessness to this story and I can't decide if it's due to naivete or over confidence, or maybe both. I can accept that there is nothing strange about traveling alone, or choosing an uncommon first destination, but the interaction with men she met on the Internet tothe extent of staying with one of them in Amsterdam, that is an unsafe and unwise move.
Her Mother said she did not want her to go. If her Mother knew of these types of plans, I can understand why. The friend backed out. Was she concerned about what Sarai had in mind for the two of them?
I wonder if the husband and family did not "sign on" to the rather inexpensive trip to Turkey...but once Sarai got to Istanbul, she began spending money on these other trips. The husband might be the source of the $10,000 figure. I also find it hard to believe that they would not be worried about her staying on an Internet friend's couch. I wonder if there was some discord.
It may not be unusual for a woman to travel alone to an exotic place, but Sarai made some reckless choices once away. I am very afraid for her.
Totally agree. Her friend has said that is a street smart New Yorker. This is not street smart at all. If I didn't know how old she was I would be guessing that she is a teenager. I was quite alarmed when I read that she slept on the couch of a man that she met in Amsterdam. That is beyond reckless. I think everyone should be forced to see the movie "Hostel" before travelling abroad. It will knock some senses into them.
Be fore-warned, the Turkish press has been wrong about events in this case before (or at least been hotly contradicted by other sources).
The Turkish press says "Taylan" is in custody but denies meeting Sarai on the 21st. If he's in custody, it's because they do not believe him.
Then the Turkish press claims someone turned on her American phone and used Skype on the 30th, and turned the phone on again on the 31st. WHAT?! Up to now everyone said her phone was found in her room!!! If the phone was used on the 30th, who was skyped??!! And where was the phone when it was turned on each day??
If the phone story is true, there are three options here: (1) Sarai is alive and responsible for her own disappearance, (2) Sarai is not alive and her abductor (possibly "Taylan") used the phone to deflect blame, or (3) Sarai is alive and trying to get help -- but why would she not have Skyped someone close to her and gotten word out that way on the 30th?
This story turns more bizarre by the day. I really feel for people close to her, as it seems to only get harder to get a handle on what happened.
It would indeed make sense that she did take the Turkish phone for pics on the bridge since she was texting and calling with it. She wouldn't want to use her US phone with roaming charges for that. Which would mean that she made it back to her apartment to deposit her Turkish phone at some point.
bbm
What gets me about the story of him being in custody is that when we first brought it up a few pages back, I believe the articles were from yesterday. No US news source has picked that up yet. I'm not saying it's not true, but I just don't get it. Her story was all over the major US news outlets - on the front pages of cnn.com, abcnews.com, etc. So I would assume they would pick up something like this... :waitasec:
I have not read ever post so excuse me for asking but has our government (state dept) been asked by the family for help? I will wait for more info to come out but something just does not seem right here. I just don't know what to think, I don't understand married people with children traveling alone to places in this day and age that I for one would look at as being just a tad bit dangerous. But that's just me. jmo
I totally agree with both of you. The fact that she travelled alone, does not seem odd to me.. But.. To meet people from the internet, that can be very dangerous.
Just reading back and seeing the news about her phone.
Last night, I went through this whole case with DH. He really doesn't get into missing people, etc., but I wanted to tell him this story and get his opinion. He has traveled extensively throughout the world as an int'l consultant (almost 30 countries).
His immediate take: "If I had ever flown somewhere then gone 1000 miles to another place to spend the night one a woman's sofa who I had met online, what would YOU think?" He went on to say none of it really adds up to him.
While I'm still leaning towards something happening to Sarai, he now has me entertaining other options - especially in light of her Skype being used. (Who did she Skype?!?) Did she maybe panic about returning home after having such a carefree and independent time overseas? I sure don't want to think that, but at least it may mean that she is safe.
I'm still not there yet, though. I still think she fell prey to someone due to her naivete.