Actually I'm conflicted here. On the one hand, I could see a healthy, fit woman, mother no less, wanting some freedom to explore and travel while she's still young. I don't see anything wrong with visiting a foreign country solo as long as you take precautions. I also don't see anything wrong with staying in a male friend's home as long as you trust them and they you, and there's an understanding about what behaviors you find acceptable in your relationship with each other.
When I was younger and fresh out of college and unwedded yet, I traveled to Europe, Asia, Australia on my own and visited relatives, friends and colleagues I knew there and even stayed in their homes -- to save expenses. Nothing strange about that.
I've not stayed with strangers I've met over the internet though except once and that was only because he knew two good friends of mine real well. So I felt I could trust him because he'd be accountable to not only me, but my two friends as well. And my two friends vouched for his affability and repute.
So IDK what Sarai was thinking. I tend to give her the benefit of the doubt though. I think she was just an innocent woman who wanted to see the world and take some nice photos and share them with the world while she was still young, and before she started school. She may have been a bit naive, but it's a hit-and-miss if you meet someone online. Even the most gentle, kind-hearted person online can turn into a monster when you meet them in real life. You just can't tell via the internet alone.
On the other hand, perhaps she was involved in something -- inadvertently and perhaps even intentionally. Perhaps there was something to be gained financially, etc. in her trip overseas. No one knows for certain. We'll just have to wait for the full investigation.
It's extraordinarily sad that a young life has been taken away, and that she leaves behind two very innocent little boys.
Okay....I haven't been able to read EVERYTHING...but here's what I'm thinking.....
A) I'm still concerned that a Puerto Rican husband would let his wife travel overseas with no issues. (this simply does not play into general reality....could I be wrong? Heck ya! But still....something is suspicious in my mind..and I KNOW Puerto Ricans) I've lived in a patriarchal family oriented structure and my mind continually says, "how did he accept this? HOW!? Even if he was a born and bred American, how many men would let their wives do this with 'no problem'?"
B) I have watched enough 'Locked-up Abroad' to know that things are rarely what they appear. She might have not been a drug-mule, but a GOLD-mule. Most Americans would not have much of an issue with transporting gold. It seems rather harmless, but if her financial situation is at is appears....it seems a not-very-evil way to make money.
C) Locked-up Abroad again: People who chose to be gold-mules OR drug-mules are rarely EVIL. They are simply in a situation where they have to choose the least evil....and transporting a bit of gold doesn't seem that bad. (Especially if you think you can get away with it because you are American). This MAY explain why her jewelry was not particularly important to the killer....what's a few grams compared with a larger amount of gold? Nothing.
D) Locked-up Abroad, AGAIN!: Most American's are naive. And most of us think that we can rise above any situation we face (health or international). Is it possible that Sarai got involved with people who she could not rationalize their criminality?
E) Because my marriage was miserable, I KNOW what it is like to think there is something better far away (we are ALL seeking love). Is it possible that Sarai DID go on her adventure in an attempt to find love? OF COURSE! All any of us want is to be adored and loved. I was the most faithful and moral of wives ever...but when placed in a situation where I thought I'd truly be loved (by a Middle Easterner) I chose hope over reality. I had only had sex with two people in my life, but I can assure you, at a certain point in my life I would have chosen love and passion over duty and values. Since we don't know what Sarai's marriage was like, I don't fell it fair to judge her on what she may or may not have done sexually. Americans are particularly caught up in 'morality'...but when push comes to shove, human-instincts win out.
Even if the New York Times article was not totally preposterous, I think we all need to view Sarai as a human who clearly had financial issues, and may have had emotional issues. (Clearly financial? Yes. If I were traveling overseas and wanted to change my flight, I have the credit to do it on my own without consulting my husband and having him transfer funds. If you are financially viable this would be an odd thing to do. I have NO money...but I AM financially viable. If I were NOT financially viable a) I would not go on such a trip and b) I would not change my flight plans considering they cost hundreds of $'s. I know not everyone is good with their money...but this was a pretty life-changing trip. She MUST have decided to leave early over something truly meaningful (or, perhaps she realized running drugs or gold wasn't for her???)
jmo.