ThinkHard
Former Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,272
- Reaction score
- 17
I just think there are more layers here, and maybe we haven't yet really figured out what they are....but I think for some reason, someone is trying to use Z as the scapegoat.
Again its weird we have heard so much about DNA under her nails and blood on her shirt....
But this recent article doesn't mention a thing about DNA under her nails. And it emphasizes the blood on her shirt was a very small amount. And it does say it is a 100% match to Z.
But IF a spot of blood is the ONLY DNA link to Z....and DNA under the finger nails is untrue, or not a match (and i think if it was a match this article would also mention the dna under her mails being a 100% match)...... It just seems it would be a lot easier to plant a small amount of blood at a crime scene, then DNA under nails.....
It just makes me even more skeptical of how much suspect evidence they REALLY have on Z. And if there motive for going after him isn't do to something else, like being a key witness.
Again its weird we have heard so much about DNA under her nails and blood on her shirt....
But this recent article doesn't mention a thing about DNA under her nails. And it emphasizes the blood on her shirt was a very small amount. And it does say it is a 100% match to Z.
But IF a spot of blood is the ONLY DNA link to Z....and DNA under the finger nails is untrue, or not a match (and i think if it was a match this article would also mention the dna under her mails being a 100% match)...... It just seems it would be a lot easier to plant a small amount of blood at a crime scene, then DNA under nails.....
It just makes me even more skeptical of how much suspect evidence they REALLY have on Z. And if there motive for going after him isn't do to something else, like being a key witness.