This has always been exactly what I’ve thought happened. Cremated, identification error...Very doubtful that someone just stole her body and was riding around with it for some body snatcher purpose. A body will decompose even with embalming. Embalming only slows the process down, it doesn't stop it. IMO
The most likely outcome is she was cremated, which is what she wanted, but her remains weren't properly identified and her ashes are somewhere else -- either scattered or sitting in an urn in someone else's house. In other words, it's most likely the fault of the funeral home, who was found to be negligent and won't admit to their errors. IMO
All the above is IMO
Does NAMUS normally include missing dead bodies from funeral homes?I am not sure if this is the same Julie Mott, and I can't find a NamUs link in this thread. The little information I have seems to match, except for a small age difference (25 vs 26). The profile was removed in the past hours. If it was this Julie's profile I wonder if her body was found.
Missing Person / NamUs #MP32861
View NamUs missing person case MP32861 for Julie Mott missing from San Antonio, Texas. Date of last contact: Aug 15, 2015. NCMEC case number: --.namus.nij.ojp.gov
That’s why I am wondering too. This is such an unique situation, but I can’t find more information about MP32861 anywhere, unfortunately. I tried the wayback machine but I can only see the page as it is now, with the permission error.Does NAMUS normally include missing dead bodies from funeral homes?
No articles indicating that she has been located.
I think it's important she is in there, because if her body was stolen and hidden or buried somewhere rather than mistakenly cremated, then she needs to have her details there to be compared to if a set of remains is found that could be her. Perhaps her profile has been hidden for some reason, and was set to public accidentally but then corrected.That’s why I am wondering too. This is such an unique situation, but I can’t find more information about MP32861 anywhere, unfortunately. I tried the wayback machine but I can only see the page as it is now, with the permission error.
I did find an article when searching for news that said that Julie’s body disappeared on what would have been her 26th birthday, August 15, so even the age matches along with the name, date and location.
I agree, she should be in NamUs. I remember the case of a young man whose partial remains were found and in his NamUs profile under Circumstances it stated that the profile will remain up in case other remains were found.I think it's important she is in there, because if her body was stolen and hidden or buried somewhere rather than mistakenly cremated, then she needs to have her details there to be compared to if a set of remains is found that could be her. Perhaps her profile has been hidden for some reason, and was set to public accidentally but then corrected.
MOO