GUILTY TX - Christina Morris, 23, Plano, 30 August 2014 - #19 *Arrest*

[frisson]

The word diversion has been bandied about. Not that anyone was referring to me specifically, but I do not want be thought of as doing that or derailing the thread or any such thing. I sincerely want to help. And I care.

If anyone is interested, I had some great reads on my old laptop (that got destroyed - water damage) and if I can get my hands on the links again quickly I'll post them. They're interesting if you're into that sort of thing -- FBI studies on statement analysis... deception.... even some research on 911 calls and who places the calls for a missing person etc. I'll try to find them when I get time.

 

[Helen_Ready]

Cherry picking? What do you mean?

EA was the last person seen with Christina. She has not been seen or heard from since he walked in the parking garage with her. He lied about even speaking to her on the walk from the apartment and pretty much everything else concerning his whereabouts and activities from time he walked with her to the time he got to work 3 hours late. IMO that isn't cherry picking that is bringing to light that something here is amiss. Christina is the victim, her family and friends are the victims here. Let's keep everything in perspective shall we.

I could care less about anyone's drug involvement to be completely honest. I want to know where Christina is. I want to know if she is alive or if she has been harmed, and I want the person responsible for that prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. If people want to sell and take drugs so be it that is their choice to ruin their lives, I could care less. But I want to know what happened to Christina and if we have to cherry pick, picket, scream, be loud, we will be. IMO there is no cherry picking going on, the facts are the facts. He could stop the entire thing by telling the truth. And if he didn't do it so be it. But he makes himself look guilty by his actions IMO. And if he didn't do it, then he needs to fess up and tell who did. But I think he did it. I think he knows exactly where she is and what happened to her. And we WILL find her. We will not give up not today, tomorrow, or ever. However long it takes we will keep searching until she is home where she belongs.

Thank you!

 

[Helen_Ready]

He also volunteered to take a lie detector test which I believe others refused to take when asked.

I am open to other theories. I have taken a lot of these ideas and what if's to Jonni that I got on WS. I actually get help here. I am super open. However, the Hunter bashing is ridiculous IMO. We just need to move on from it. Didn't happen.

I am interested in who was in the party of 10 he discussed in the interview and where did they all go after they left? Where they all still there at 4am or were there 10 at the beginning of the night only?

That was the first I have heard of there being 10 people.

 

[frisson]

If you are not convinced I would like to hear possibilities of how he got those injuries. The injuries had to occur after the video footage of him walking to garage and before he went to work ....unless you have another explanation.
Can you explain how Le has pointed the finger at EA and said he has interferred? Why did Le in the warrant say lied?

LE said that EA interfered because he lied to LE. Why? IDK. He had a reason, but I don't know what it was.

I also know there are many ways to be injured. I agree on the injury timeline as mentioned in that he seemed to be walking fine in the footage.

The warrant said that he lied because he lied.

I dont' know if he forgot where he parked. Im not sure if that part was a lie. People do forget where they park even when not drinking. There are many aspects to the interview. The one I am focused on is that I don't believe he's the one who took Christina, so who did?

I am not defending lying to LE. My point is that in my opinion, I believe EA when he said that he didn't hurt Christina or cause her to be missing or however it was phrased. I can't quote it verbatim, so I shouldn't try.

 

[wendiyking]

I'm sure you all would search every square inch of this planet if that's what it takes. She has an Army for sure. I just hope Christina is able to look back and be thankful for this army when she is found! I search everything just to see what I can find. I found it very interesting that the place they were searching last week wasn't far off from what they are saying on the Psychic websites.... and I don't even believe in that stuff. But just seeing all the similarities, made me want to take everything they say there and go look myself! I don't know what happened, but I believe (my opinion, yada yada) that he at the very least knows what happened between them walking and getting in cars... and maybe something happened that he never planned (and she bit the heck out of him)... just do everyone a favor, and say what is known EA!

He also volunteered to take a lie detector test which I believe others refused to take when asked.

I am open to other theories. I have taken a lot of these ideas and what if's to Jonni that I got on WS. I actually get help here. I am super open. However, the Hunter bashing is ridiculous IMO. We just need to move on from it. Didn't happen.

I am interested in who was in the party of 10 he discussed in the interview and where did they all go after they left? Where they all still there at 4am or were there 10 at the beginning of the night only?

 

[Sugie]

I'm not sure if this has been asked and answered, but were dogs used in the garage to follow her scent? What about EA's did they track his also and did they follow the same path? I don't know if that would even been a valid thing to have done. Just wondering. TIA for any answers.

 

[SaintGirl]

He also volunteered to take a lie detector test which I believe others refused to take when asked.

I am open to other theories. I have taken a lot of these ideas and what if's to Jonni that I got on WS. I actually get help here. I am super open. However, the Hunter bashing is ridiculous IMO. We just need to move on from it. Didn't happen.

I am interested in who was in the party of 10 he discussed in the interview and where did they all go after they left? Where they all still there at 4am or were there 10 at the beginning of the night only?

Were there others who wouldn't take a lie detector other than EA?

 

[Faithx2]

I'm not sure if this has been asked and answered, but were dogs used in the garage to follow her scent? What about EA's did they track his also and did they follow the same path? I don't know if that would even been a valid thing to have done. Just wondering. TIA for any answers.

No dogs were used in the parking garage since so much time had lapsed from when she went missing until she was reported missing. With that being a public place and so many people and cars in and out of there over the period of 3 or 4 days I can understand why they would not bring dogs in at that point. It was reported yesterday that 3 canines were used in the organized search yesterday. I am not sure if Texas Equisearch used canines when they were here. I think yesterday is the first time dogs have been used so hopefully that means they are getting close!

 

[Sugie]

Thank you Faithx2. I figured that was the case, but thought I would ask.

 

[Helen_Ready]

LE said that EA interfered because he lied to LE. Why? IDK. He had a reason, but I don't know what it was.

I also know there are many ways to be injured. I agree on the injury timeline as mentioned in that he seemed to be walking fine in the footage.

The warrant said that he lied because he lied.

I dont' know if he forgot where he parked. Im not sure if that part was a lie. People do forget where they park even when not drinking. There are many aspects to the interview. The one I am focused on is that I don't believe he's the one who took Christina, so who did?

I am not defending lying to LE. My point is that in my opinion, I believe EA when he said that he didn't hurt Christina or cause her to be missing or however it was phrased. I can't quote it verbatim, so I shouldn't try.

I respectfully respect your opinion ....it just doesn't make any sense to lie just for the sake of lying...

 

[Mamamerced]

I watched the uncut interview and I found him to be telling the truth about that aspect. That he didn't hurt Christina... or harm.. I cant recall the exact wording. If I did not have those interviews(and there are a couple more out there or I saw snippets of the same one) I would be confused as to who did what and I'd be inclined to say it looks really bad for EA.... without the interview. The interview changed that for me. Also, the other circumstances can indeed be deemed peculiar. (There's a list of them that I don't have right now, but you touched on some of them) those things don't convince me in that, yes, they're fishy and weird, but not absolute for me. I'm not convinced for sure how he got those injuries and I'm not even sure what the injuries were. I asked on another page if LE examined his body for scratches, - head, face, neck ,chest, etc and maybe I missed the answer if there was one. There's more that does not equal kidnapping or manslaughter or murder for me. For example, vacuuming is not weird to me. I can see how some would see it that way though. I'll stop there.

Are you basing your belief that EA did not cause harm to Christina on the uncut interview? You said you found him to be telling the truth and that the interview changed your inclination to think it looked really bad for EA.
Respectfully, I saw the interview in a very different light. I thought he came off very poorly. He seemed to swallow repeatedly after answering many of the questions. I also detected what I thought was a clamping of his jaw at the end of (what I considered to be a well coached) answer.....almost as a cue to himself to not say more than was rehearsed. I also thought he looked petrified, with a few exceptions.......when he smiled easily with someone in the background, whom I believe was either the interviewer or the spokesman from AA. Granted, these were only my observations and not proof of guilt. But I keep remembering that pathological liars are very, very convincing. EA might well be one, but I don't know.
MOO

 

[frisson]

I respectfully respect your opinion ....it just doesn't make any sense to lie just for the sake of lying...

Helen_Ready, I didn't say that he was lying just for the sake of lying. I said that IDK the reason. Apparently he had one. Even so I do not think he harmed Christina. Lying and kidnapping /murder are not automatically all in one and the same for me.

 

[Helen_Ready]

Are you basing your belief that EA did not cause harm to Christina on the uncut interview? You said you found him to be telling the truth and that the interview changed your inclination to think it looked really bad for EA.
Respectfully, I saw the interview in a very different light. I thought he came off very poorly. He seemed to swallow repeatedly after answering many of the questions. I also detected what I thought was a clamping of his jaw at the end of (what I considered to be a well coached) answer.....almost as a cue to himself to not say more than was rehearsed. I also thought he looked petrified, with a few exceptions.......when he smiled easily with someone in the background, whom I believe was either the interviewer or the spokesman from AA. Granted, these were only my observations and not proof of guilt. But I keep remembering that pathological liars are very, very convincing. EA might well be one, but I don't know.
MOO

Mammerced, I like how you say how you feel and then you back up your statements as to why you feel that way....you gave us tangible things you saw EA doing in the video to form your opinion.

 

[Helen_Ready]

Helen_Ready, I didn't say that he was lying just for the sake of lying. I said that IDK the reason. Apparently he had one. Even so I do not think he harmed Christina. Lying and kidnapping /murder are not automatically all in one and the same for me.

Then why did he lie?

 

[frisson]

Are you basing your belief that EA did not cause harm to Christina on the uncut interview? You said you found him to be telling the truth and that the interview changed your inclination to think it looked really bad for EA.
Respectfully, I saw the interview in a very different light. I thought he came off very poorly. He seemed to swallow repeatedly after answering many of the questions. I also detected what I thought was a clamping of his jaw at the end of (what I considered to be a well coached) answer.....almost as a cue to himself to not say more than was rehearsed. I also thought he looked petrified, with a few exceptions.......when he smiled easily with someone in the background, whom I believe was either the interviewer or the spokesman from AA. Granted, these were only my observations and not proof of guilt. But I keep remembering that pathological liars are very, very convincing. EA might well be one, but I don't know.
MOO

I can see why you say that. I see it differently and that's supposed to be OK.

I agree though. I too don't think/know he is a pathological liar.

I would not blame him if he were terrified. Some people are afraid, not at ease, to be on camera, especially under such sad circumstances of a missing woman. Also, a guilty person would likely not have agreed to an interview (imo) particularly without legal counsel.

I don't think he hurt Christina and I stand by that. I do want to know who did though.
Maybe I should shutty.

 

[SaintGirl]

Helen_Ready, I didn't say that he was lying just for the sake of lying. I said that IDK the reason. Apparently he had one. Even so I do not think he harmed Christina. Lying and kidnapping /murder are not automatically all in one and the same for me.

So you agree he lied but don't equate that with kidnapping/murder. Fair enough. What about the injuries? In the warrant LE noticed bruises and abrasions on his forarm and hand. How do you think that could have happened? And what do you think happened to Christina? Not being edgy, would really like to hear what you think (you too Eileen if you are still reading).

 

[margarita25]

What is your theory on the bite mark ?

My thought on this (not to rudely interrupt, lol, I don't think you were asking me ) is that this could be the smoking gun, if proven strongly in court via documentation/strong forensic proof. We see the infamous bite marks put people away all the time on "Forensic Files", etc right? Now, hopefully his lawyer doesn't pull a Cochran glove maneuver or anything ("If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!" ).

*this is all hypothetically speaking, if EA is the perp, which imo, it's sounding that way, jmo.

 

[Helen_Ready]

So you agree he lied but don't equate that with kidnapping/murder. Fair enough. What about the injuries? In the warrant LE noticed bruises and abrasions on his forarm and hand. How do you think that could have happened? And what do you think happened to Christina? Not being edgy, would really like to hear what you think (you too Eileen if you are still reading).

Yes....I'm open to the questions you pose to Frisson?

 

[hibiscus31]

Well, one very realistic possibility about why he lied is because...he had something to do with her disappearance! And I still contend that if EA got car damage in any other way that did NOT have to do with her disappearance, he would have happily told us that. Instead, he apparently made up a story about punching his car out of anger. Why in the world would he have to make a story like that up? Hmmmm... We all have some strong opinions on here...and I respect yours frisson, I just reaaaally disagree right now, lol. Can we please, please get some answers and find her soon? We are all passionately pulling for this and I know her family needs answers.

For those that do think ea had something to do with it, I wish we could sleuth more about where she could be at this point. He doesn't strike me as one who would trek far off the beaten path to hide someone...

 

[Helen_Ready]

My thought on this (not to rudely interrupt, lol, I don't think you were asking me ) is that this could be the smoking gun, if proven strongly in court via documentation/strong forensic proof. (We see the infamous bite marks put people away all the time on "Forensic Files", etc) right? Now, hopefully his lawyer doesn't pull a Cochran glove maneuver or anything ("If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!" ).

*this is all hypothetically speaking, if EA is the perp, which imo, it's sounding that way, jmo.

Glad to hear from you...now that's an explanation...we shall see what Le has. The PPD is known to be very meticulous so I doubt they wouldn't move forward without having all there ducks in a row. I do like your comment and appreciate it...great analogy.