They aren't in any hurry to charge him because they want him to reveal where her body is. He's in jail, he's not going anywhere.
JMO
Ok. JMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They aren't in any hurry to charge him because they want him to reveal where her body is. He's in jail, he's not going anywhere.
JMO
the me decides what is accidental and what is homicide.
I can see how either could be possible. Still, I think it is worth at least looking into whether any other girls in his life (or who lived near him) have gone missing.When I say accident, I mean he could have gotten too rough and accidentally killed her, meaning he did not set out to kill her. In tthat scenario, he could have still PUT HER IN HIS TRUNK. PUTTING HER IN HIS TRUNK does not automatically mean he was a seasoned serial killer. He just likes his car far more than human life so he PUT HER IN HIS TRUNK. IMO
FWIW I thought I'd post this about the DNA;
"The affidavit read:
Due to the amount of Christina Morris DNA found to be present in the interior trunk area of Arochis vehicle, affiant believes this DNA was from Christina Morris bodily fluids such as blood or saliva.
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/12/19/...tina-morris-kidnapper-as-sexually-frustrated/
Rather seems to be the PPD's style with this case, doesn't it? To release only the info that they feel is absolutely necessary at any given point, I mean.now wouldnt they know if it was Blood or Saliva?
they have the forensics report they know if it was blood or saliva. If blood was present Luminol would show it!
Why be so evasive?
I believe it's highly likely she was leftt on private property. The Leanne Bearden case is a perfect example of how long someone can be missing when they were right there all along, just because she was on private property. I don't tthink it takes a seasoned serial murderer to keep a body from being found right away. MOO
I believe it's likely too. Esp when ones family business is home sales.
now wouldnt they know if it was Blood or Saliva?
they have the forensics report they know if it was blood or saliva. If blood was present Luminol would show it!
Why be so evasive?
I can see how either could be possible. Still, I think it is worth at least looking into whether any other girls in his life (or who lived near him) have gone missing.
I can see how either could be possible. Still, I think it is worth at least looking into whether any other girls in his life (or who lived near him) have gone missing.
Definitely. I think his past needs to be put under a microscope and see what can be dug up. Not only for the purposes of figuring out what else he's done wrong, to keep him locked up longer if necessary (maybe CM isn't the only one that needs justice from his actions), but also to reveal clues about where CM might be.
One thing we know - EA knows (!!) what he did with CM, because he had her IN HIS TRUNK. If we want to know where she is, that's who knows the answer, and we have to focus on everything to do with EA and maybe we'll get some clues that will show us where she is.
My guess would be that it wasn't very much DNA. When they say "due to the amount of DNA found...." it can mean there was very little or a whole lot. I'm thinking it was a small sample size. MOO
Potential loophole with CM dna in EA's trunk.....maybe CM tried getting something out of EA's trunk? CM's dna could of been left behind that way. Its a far stretch with all the evidence against EA but trying to keep a somewhat open mind until we find out more info from PPD. What other ways could CM's dna be left in EA's trunk?
IMO the real estate angle has been concerning...e.g. Are there properties that would present an opportunity to hide things? Even recall it mentioned up string this could be why there was a significant amount of cleaners in the trash etc.
The interesting thing is TREC has no Arochi licensed real estate agent/broker in the state of Texas....none.
I'm honestly curious as to where else you think we need to look into his past? IMO that's been done. Everything under his name(s) has been posted. As someone said upthread, I guess we could find out if any of his pets went missing or mysterious fires in his general vicinity. I'm stumped. I would assume LE has done a neighborhood canvass and looked extensively into his past. I would hope so anyway. MOO
My guess would be that it wasn't very much DNA. When they say "due to the amount of DNA found...." it can mean there was very little or a whole lot. I'm thinking it was a small sample size. MOO
And for this very reason I feel something more is going on.Rather seems to be the PPD's style with this case, doesn't it? To release only the info that they feel is absolutely necessary at any given point, I mean.
Hmm... I seem to think that they meant "quite a bit", the way it's worded.. JMO!
I am curious why you believe it was not very much DNA? The arrest warrant on page 8 "indicated there was a significant amount of DNA present which was produced from a single source female profile".
But if it was quite a bit, I would think they would know if it was blood vs. saliva. MOO