I understand that you think ONLY EA is responsible
What I have been saying is that ALL the evidence clearly points to EA and no one else as the focal point and perp in this crime, so I have to go where the evidence takes me. And as I have noted many times, if perhaps there is anyone else involved, continuing the focus on EA helps in that area as well, because he would know who it is.
but please don't make others feel they can not have differing opinions.
Others will opine however they want, and I have no control over that - please don't try to imply that I do. I talk about what the evidence tells me, and it speaks clearly here. It would be a disservice to others if I pretended to see a haziness that I do not see.
#1- How would you like him to leave the garage, just sit there for 20 minutes, IMHO he left the garage like any other person leaves the garage
You missed my point entirely. The fact he left quickly wasn't cited as a negative, but rather as a piece of evidence that helps prove there was no extended opportunity for EA and CM to have been together, near his car, where as they benignly hung out together while her DNA could have magically flown off of her and made its way into his TRUNK during some sort of extended interaction.
#2- They had Heather Elvis's DNA IN THEIR TRUNK too, see how that turned out, I know you are opposed to reading about other cases but it is helpful.
Different case, different circumstances, different context, quite irrelevant to the evidence and how it is meaningful in this one. The idea that we can understand how this case will be adjudicated, based on one snippet of evidence in that one, is not how the law actually works.
(Just to be clear, I know lots and lots about lots of cases, and have no aversion to "legal knowledge." My objection to studying THAT case is as a "guide" to how this one will evolve, because I know from experience it can't do that.)
#3- If I was hanging out with a bunch of drug users/dealers and my last text to someone was trying to buy crack cocaine I would lie too, In my circle of friends, it would be more embarrassing and appalling to be buying crack than to be in jail for murder. Crack is whack and crackheads are not the most respected of individuals, sorry but I would lie my *advertiser censored* off about it, even going to jail for murder if I thought I would get off so I didn't have to admit to my mother/father I was trying to buy crack.
You would accept a murder conviction and go to death row without speaking up on what really happened, so that no one would know you like crack? I don't think that's real life. In the least. For anyone.
In my opinion it is very very likely that EA is solely responsible
Perhaps. All I would say is that ALL the evidence we know about points directly at him, and all we can do is follow the evidence.
but to try to discount other people possibly involved is something I won't do.
You can do as you wish, but I will continue to observe based on the evidence. At this point, we have seen no evidence that either (a) ties someone else to CM at or after she was seen in the video with EA, or (b) ties someone else to him that night after that point. It's the evidence (or, total lack of same) that points to EA and discounts the involvement of others, and nothing else.
I APPRECIATE EVERY single thought, idea and theory posted whether you think EA did it or not.
Of course the talk is interesting. Others can share what they think, and they will. At the same time, please don't demand that I change my opinions to cater to what others want it to be.
I see a clear set of evidence that will put EA behind bars for 99 years for AK, and may eventually lead to a murder conviction as well if he doesn't work a deal and tell where he put CM. The DNA clearly shows he put her IN HIS TRUNK and, combined with the rest of the evidence, imo he's toast.
