TX - Hailey Dunn, 13, Colorado City, 27 Dec 2010 - #24

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's at the bottom of pdf pg 3 and beginning of pdf pg 4. The sum of it is that after Billi went to work her phone continued to ping at tower 724 which is the same tower that SA's phone pinged at. Tower 724 is the area of Billi's home. The gist is Billi left her phone home for the kids to use.

http://bigcountryhomepage.com/image...edia/dox/pdf/2011_01/HaileyDunnAffidavits.PDF

I'm not reading anything in there about Billi's phone pinging, only that SA's phone was pinging from tower 724.
 
bolded by me....SO....SOMEONE was using B's phone?....if not H...then who? why?....

That's not what it says. A phone does not have to be in use or even turned on to ping. It just needs to have a battery in it. Ping is different than a call history. We do not know the call history of Billi's phone that day.
 
no the phone was on (bd's) at the home where she left it..

it was pinging the home tower..

HOWEVER SA'S PHONE PINGED IT TOO... WHEN HE CLAIMS HE DROVE HOME AFTER HIS WORK INCIDENT (((which in fact was just a run to the drink machine to get a doctor pepper... the drink that discovered his idol in the MM movies... and which his screen name also has significance... with the "78"")

might I add give me a small coincidence and I will assign it as such... give me more coincidental info and I start to think something is there...


Shawn seems to be a guy who makes a statement of himself... no matter if it is an internet handle or the like... I would look for something else here in this matter... not sure what yet.. but he is very much a labeled person imhoo.. and does things to stay there... wouldn't be at all surprised if this is his 'excuse' ((of course there is no excuse)) but sick people can have sick excuses....

just a thought
 
As someone who lives in Snyder, IMPO would love to think that Ms. Hailey ran away, I would probably believe she did if not for SA story unraveling. All I can say for now is that the only person's story I am believing in tragedy is DD. We love you Hailey!!
 
That's not what it says. A phone does not have to be in use or even turned on to ping. It just needs to have a battery in it. Ping is different than a call history. We do not know the call history of Billi's phone that day.

thanks so much for clarifying that....I would LOVE to see the call history..
 
Quick question, if anybody knows off-hand. Has anyone besides Billie who's credible said the bloodhounds hit near the hotel?

Reason I ask is that I see a subtle theme in Billie's early NG interviews. Hailey had a bf I didn't know about. Hailey was talking with a boy. Hailey was seen with MB and a boy. Bloodhounds hit near the hotel.

Just wondering if LE had ever said the bloodhounds hit at the hotel, or if that just came from Billie.

TIA

Yes...well, if you call / consider "Kamfer" credible...

snipped>

On Friday, bloodhounds were taken to the six motels in Colorado City. At Western Suites, which is located at 2233 Vine Street and is adjacent to Interstate 20 and near the Dunn home, the dogs picked up on Dunn’s scent in the parking lot, City Manager Pete Kampfer said Tuesday night.

http://www.reporternews.com/news/2011/jan/04/hed-help-herey-hed-help-herey/?preventMobileRedirect=1
 
bolded by me....SO....SOMEONE was using B's phone?....if not H...then who? why?....

In the affidavit it states that the phone was utilized OR pinged the same Verizon tower at same time as SA's cell phone..

So, it may not ha ve been "utilized"{made outgoing/received incoming}.. it could have just pinged that tower.

{upthread I posted screenshots of the actual Affidavit}
 
I'm not reading anything in there about Billi's phone pinging, only that SA's phone was pinging from tower 724.
the affidavit clearly states her phone pinged off of a tower at that time... during the time that SA's phone was pinging off the same tower

and tower that would service the home where Hailey was allegedly sleeping at the time...

scary stuff.

and lots of lies being told here.
 
Well damn! It does not say anything about pings on Billi's phone. Goes straight to saying the house pings on tower 724. My mistake!!!

(calling the optomistrist to schedule an eye exam.)
 
That's not what it says. A phone does not have to be in use or even turned on to ping. It just needs to have a battery in it. Ping is different than a call history. We do not know the call history of Billi's phone that day.

You're right, of course. That information would be very helpful. But I read that LE would not confirm that the neighbor next door saw Hailey using the phone. So did SA call Hailey? Possibly rush her to get ready and see her mom there was an emergency?? Why delete calls on that day?
 
Well damn! It does not say anything about pings on Billi's phone. Goes straight to saying the house pings on tower 724. My mistake!!!

(calling the optomistrist to schedule an eye exam.)



FOR REAL? IF SO GOOD CATCH!


so were they mainly using that tower as a reference then?

if so where was BD's phone and where was IT PINGING?

eta: I thought in reading that both phones pinged off the same tower for the same time period?
 
You're right, of course. That information would be very helpful. But I read that LE would not confirm that the neighbor next door saw Hailey using the phone. So did SA call Hailey? Possibly rush her to get ready and see her mom there was an emergency?? Why delete calls on that day?

Well with my new revelation with the help of other sleuthers. Where was Billi's phone that day? I can't believe I read that doc a hundred times and interpreted it incorrectly.
 
Something that has bothered me: I wonder why BD called her son at noon, and told him to text HD to tell her to come home. Why? It's not like mom would be there all afternoon, so what would it have mattered if she was at her friends home, occupied until mom got off work? I've swung back and forth on who did what, and who knew what. But this really makes me wonder if it was an attempt at some kind of alibi, and bringing an innocent 16 year old into it to make it "look good" ????
 
I'm not reading anything in there about Billi's phone pinging, only that SA's phone was pinging from tower 724.

Refer to post #359 for actual screenshot of the affidavit. You can read the exact words of the affidavit..

**and thanks to SuziQ for thinking to clarify the distinction that a cell phone does not have to be in use, nor does it have to be even powered ON..just as long as the battery is in the cell phone it will continue to "ping" the nearest tower**
 
I am not so concerned about the pings right now... because I think we only have a snippet of them ... enough of them to get the SW signed...


but they ARE disconcerting...

they make me want to throw the truth out of the principal players.

-------------

this is a child.

she has the right to grow up and live out her life...

how dare anyone take that opportunity from her!
 
Well with my new revelation with the help of other sleuthers. Where was Billi's phone that day? I can't believe I read that doc a hundred times and interpreted it incorrectly.

Well, I was saying earlier that I believed Billie did not leave her phone. But now....:waitasec:
 
FOR REAL? IF SO GOOD CATCH!


so were they mainly using that tower as a reference then?

if so where was BD's phone and where was IT PINGING?

eta: I thought in reading that both phones pinged off the same tower for the same time period?

nursebeeme I am reading it just the same as you are.. I even screenshot it and pasted them on post #359...I'm so confused now.
 
i dont find that odd. My grandkids think im nuts cause I call thier 31 yr old Dad baby all the time. JMO

I hear what you're saying but Billie has referred to Hailey a few xs as "just a BABY"..I truly believe this is how she sees Hailey but maybe not all girls that age..KWIM?
 
Something that has bothered me: I wonder why BD called her son at noon, and told him to text HD to tell her to come home. Why? It's not like mom would be there all afternoon, so what would it have mattered if she was at her friends home, occupied until mom got off work? I've swung back and forth on who did what, and who knew what. But this really makes me wonder if it was an attempt at some kind of alibi, and bringing an innocent 16 year old into it to make it "look good" ????

My only reasoning for this is if she is anything like I am, I don't like for my kids to overstay their welcome when spending the night. I usually tell my kids I will pick them up at noon, unless another time has been worked out beforehand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
218
Total visitors
364

Forum statistics

Threads
608,549
Messages
18,241,148
Members
234,398
Latest member
Criminal96
Back
Top