Fascinated1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 451
- Reaction score
- 1,659
Too far fetched to wonder if she was in witness protection?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could go either way, it is a profession for which you do not always file taxes or even prove identity, especially true when she would have been doing it.
Her writing a letter to Blake would imply she did NOT intend to kill them. Otherwise he would never see it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Been suggested many times. They have better ways to establish a new identity that do not involve dead children and a name change in court. More likely she did it herself. Find a copy of one of the old Loompanics books, it is all in there.Too far fetched to wonder if she was in witness protection?
I agree, georgiagirl. Besides, her very young daughter was supposed to be in that house with Blake and his parents. I just can't see even her killing anyone with her daughter present.
She may have stayed up all night writing the letters because I believe she was found @ 6:30am?
I would imagine her paranoia of being out in the country all alone would have driven her to the brink as she had been seen walking the perimeter of the property at times.
But why leave the box in the closet marked 'crafts' and tell Blake to never touch it? Did she forget it was even there before she went on her suicide mission? Did she mean to leave it and totally confuse people? All of it is crazy and is driving me crazy!!
:waitasec:
JMO
I don't have anything other than Velling/ss88 to go on, but it just makes sense to me. In the early 90's there just weren't opportunities for a woman to earn enough money to live on without some sort of education or skill. Not even today really. I can't come up with another explanation for her to quickly obtain enough money to accomplish all this getting around & live on while in school.
She had a restraining order against her, she threatened her in-laws. It is not unreasonable to believe that a female, a mother could be so angry about being separated from her husband and at times her daughter (with a restraining order included, remember her husband moved in with the in-laws). Add to this the fact that her hidden identity was now at risk of being revealed due to the divorce, and her in-laws uneasiness with her not telling them anything about herself.
We have no idea about the "real" FLEK, what we do know is that she did have a violent streak along with mental instability witnessed by people other than the Ruff family.
I forgot about the restraining order. Goodness what a mess this woman created, for whatever reason. I go back and forth between compassion for LEK & compassion for the Ruff family. I hope that the daughter that they are raising is not taking some of the leftover anger for the position that LEK put their family in. It really doesn't matter what the Ruff family said or did after LEK's suicide, she deceived them horribly. They were unwittingly suckered into this. If they choose to pour water over any speculation about LEK or keep it quiet, that is their right. No one else has to live with that deception. No one else has to recover from that or raise a motherless child. A child who is someday going to learn that her mother pulled off a pretty incredible and hurtful scam, for whatever reason.
There were opportunities for young women to earn enough money to save and travel or save and purchase a car in the early 1990's. I knew other females who worked and took off to backpack across Australia or Europe. Staying at hostels was a popular thing to do back then.
Just started following this and am getting caught up on reading. Really interesting! She had to have money coming in from somewhere to allow her to travel, change her name , and enroll in college. I saw the posts about her potentially being DS and about DS getting immunity for testifying--is there any way LE could have helped with her change in identity? I have not read back far enough to know if there was a reason for her moving away from BST identity so quickly--so maybe they did that so it would be harder to trace her? Also ironic that she took her own life on Dec 24 and BST was killed on Dec 29. .
Another thing I noticed is that Blake was reported to be evasive, but this was chalked to be "just how he is". But Lori's evasiveness (although, yes we know she had changed her name, etc) was a HUGE issue to the Ruffs vs "just how she is." Why? Was there some other reason that made them so sure she was faking her identity besides not wanting to discuss her past? If I knew someone who didn't want to discuss their past, I would just assume "bad past" not "identity thief/KGB mole". I wonder if she slipped up one day a tiny bit and this made them suspicious? If so, what was the slipup?
But why leave the box in the closet marked 'crafts' and tell Blake to never touch it? Did she forget it was even there before she went on her suicide mission? Did she mean to leave it and totally confuse people? All of it is crazy and is driving me crazy!!