Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO It was not his obligation to cater to "old wounds" in someone else, unless maybe you're codependent. Sure, you can do your best, but this is not on CS. The responsibility for "old wounds" belongs to KA entirely. And if he was a person who couldn't meet her needs in that respect, she should have moved on: he was not going to be the right partner.I think this is an important point that will register with the jury. CS did, in fact, trigger old wounds in KA by maintaining contact with Mo. No excuse for KA here intended. But it’s clear that KA was set off by his relationship (even if in his mind it had evolved into a professional friendship.)
KA couldn’t handle it, and the emotional ”trigger” set into motion a real-life trigger being pulled.
Mo didn’t stand a chance against KA’s rage.
I teach at a college with a huge fashion design and merchandising program, and I can state with confidence that the term is used specifically to refer to clothing and accessory brands (Zara is the most notorious offender, but Primark, Forever 21, H&M are other well known offenders) that produce WAY more “collections“ than other fashion companies (like 10-12 new collections a year, as opposed to 4-6 collections a year for non-fast fashion brands, and often even fewer for higher-end and couture brands) that consist of cheaply-made garments (usually produced in…questionable…labor conditions in developing nations) that are sold at low prices to the mass market. The idea is that these companies, by producing collections every couple of weeks, can capitalize on the most current trends in pop culture by slapping some trendy catchphrase or reproducing a meme on a shirt or handbag, and they don’t care that the items are poorly made because they know their consumers intend to throw out the garments/accessories as soon as the trends have passed so it’s not like the consumer will be disappointed when their garments or accessories fall apart after a few uses.My understanding of "fast fashion" is that it is "single-use" or maybe "single season" clothing. Sometimes, it refers to fad-ish garments that are not worn more than a few times. "Fast fashion" is nothing to do with expense or quality, as some are reading into the term. This kind of clothing is frowned on by environmentalists as being wasteful.
"Fast fashion" says something about the type of clothing and the values of the wearer.
Evidently, CS felt KA had a "high turnover" wardrobe, and didn't like her for that reason.
Luckily, your guest didn't try to take out those daddy-long-legs.IMO It was not his obligation to cater to "old wounds" in someone else, unless maybe you're codependent. Sure, you can do your best, but this is not on CS. The responsibility for "old wounds" belongs to KA entirely. And if he was a person who couldn't meet her needs in that respect, she should have moved on: he was not going to be the right partner.
People can get triggered by a million things. It's not on anyone to guess at or avoid someone else's "triggers". I had a cousin visiting, and I gave up my bedroom to her, thinking that was the best possible treatment, and I was being super nice. All she could do was complain about spiders (I lived in the woods). She seemed to anticipate that I would guess any self-respecting person would have an aversion to daddy-long-legs on the ceiling beams. That's just narcissism. And, heck, some people's triggers change on a daily basis.
Absolutely on KA to manage her emotions. She did not. KA, and only KA, is responsible for MO’s death.IMO It was not his obligation to cater to "old wounds" in someone else, unless maybe you're codependent. Sure, you can do your best, but this is not on CS. The responsibility for "old wounds" belongs to KA entirely. And if he was a person who couldn't meet her needs in that respect, she should have moved on: he was not going to be the right partner.
People can get triggered by a million things. It's not on anyone to guess at or avoid someone else's "triggers". I had a cousin visiting, and I gave up my bedroom to her, thinking that was the best possible treatment, and I was being super nice. All she could do was complain about spiders (I lived in the woods). She seemed to anticipate that I would guess any self-respecting person would have an aversion to daddy-long-legs on the ceiling beams. That's just narcissism. And, heck, some people's triggers change on a daily basis.
I agree with you she really wanted to be a part of that world.Not odd: he's a cyclist. That's a whole universe unto itself. FWIW KA desperately wanted to be in that universe, too, so she bought a bike and started cycling, I think when she started dating CS. IMO she was expecting way too much: you don't become an expert cyclist in a year or two.
CS may be confused on the term -- he complained KA shopped for clothes at Target!I teach at a college with a huge fashion design and merchandising program, and I can state with confidence that the term is used specifically to refer to clothing and accessory brands (Zara is the most notorious offender, but Primark, Forever 21, H&M are other well known offenders) that produce WAY more “collections“ than other fashion companies (like 10-12 new collections a year, as opposed to 4-6 collections a year for non-fast fashion brands, and often even fewer for higher-end and couture brands) that consist of cheaply-made garments (usually produced in…questionable…labor conditions in developing nations) that are sold at low prices to the mass market. The idea is that these companies, by producing collections every couple of weeks, can capitalize on the most current trends in pop culture by slapping some trendy catchphrase or reproducing a meme on a shirt or handbag, and they don’t care that the items are poorly made because they know their consumers intend to throw out the garments/accessories as soon as the trends have passed so it’s not like the consumer will be disappointed when their garments or accessories fall apart after a few uses.
A man who looks down on a woman because she likes to shop at “fast fashion” stores sounds both repulsively elitist and completely out of touch with (economic) reality…so, in that aspect, maybe CS and KA *did* have something in common.
Is she a planner though? I have a hard time accepting the idea that she was planning to kill Mo all along. I know it looks bad, because she had the damn gun on her, but it's just the way the murder was carried out - in broad daylight, with the potential of being recorded (which she was), the possibility of her being seen entering or leaving the residence, this super sloppy attempt to quickly hide the bike, and the obvious problem of Colin having been the last one to see her. It's just not even a plan! Doesn't it seem so spontaneous - on the back end of the murder? It's like she didn't even think about it.It is the “hangover day.” She unleashed her high nervous energy at Mo by killing her and that caused a little bit of “down”… came home quiet and tired. Whatever anger was left, with CS, she channeled into unusual pattern of intimacy that night. In the morning, she might have felt exhausted after the previous night events. She did not expect the police to zoom on them so fast, I assume. Perhaps thought they’d look for local thieves. Then CS was taken. What did she feel? I think, extreme anxiety. And here is this dude standing looking at her. So she starts talking to deal with it, it is hard to filter what to say, so she talks about MO’s achievements, different platitudes, and then she, logically, has to express concern for herself as a young woman living in TX. This is why she made a mistake. I think had the police shown up later, she’d be more prepared, but they came very early. She didn’t expect it. She is a planner. Spontaneous questions are her weak point.
So I've seen a few references now to some sort of unusual intimate or sexual encounter between KA and CS that happened the night of the murder. Where does this detail come from? Has it been discussed at trial? And what's the story here?I still maintain she may have expected to encounter -- and kill -- both. Be gone by midnight, car sold, travel arranged, gone.
She was probably angry that CS wasn't there....and had to waste energy -- and time -- on him. Passive aggressive, she was in full aggressive mode -- and brought it to bed with her.
She probably did manage to pivot enough, to relish CS not being able to outwardly react, grieve.
IMO she set out to screw CS on every level she could.
The nice, friendly Kaitlin? Façade. A brooder beneath the surface.
JMO
RSBMSo I've seen a few references now to some sort of unusual intimate or sexual encounter between KA and CS that happened the night of the murder. Where does this detail come from? Has it been discussed at trial? And what's the story here?
Gosh and his clothing is beyond comprehension.
I highlighted the aspect that these clothes are thrown away without being worn much, and the emphasis on owning many outfits. They are piling up in disadvantaged countries. There’s cachet in not buying those, thus the popularity of Patagonia and used clothing at REI.I teach at a college with a huge fashion design and merchandising program, and I can state with confidence that the term is used specifically to refer to clothing and accessory brands (Zara is the most notorious offender, but Primark, Forever 21, H&M are other well known offenders) that produce WAY more “collections“ than other fashion companies (like 10-12 new collections a year, as opposed to 4-6 collections a year for non-fast fashion brands, and often even fewer for higher-end and couture brands) that consist of cheaply-made garments (usually produced in…questionable…labor conditions in developing nations) that are sold at low prices to the mass market. The idea is that these companies, by producing collections every couple of weeks, can capitalize on the most current trends in pop culture by slapping some trendy catchphrase or reproducing a meme on a shirt or handbag, and they don’t care that the items are poorly made because they know their consumers intend to throw out the garments/accessories as soon as the trends have passed so it’s not like the consumer will be disappointed when their garments or accessories fall apart after a few uses.
A man who looks down on a woman because she likes to shop at “fast fashion” stores sounds both repulsively elitist and completely out of touch with (economic) reality…so, in that aspect, maybe CS and KA *did* have something in common.
IMO the bike thing wasn’t about hiding the bike. It was about taking Mo’s treasure, claiming it as hers by riding it, and then discarding it as though trash. Domination and obliteration. Same themes as KA had the entire time.Is she a planner though? I have a hard time accepting the idea that she was planning to kill Mo all along. I know it looks bad, because she had the damn gun on her, but it's just the way the murder was carried out - in broad daylight, with the potential of being recorded (which she was), the possibility of her being seen entering or leaving the residence, this super sloppy attempt to quickly hide the bike, and the obvious problem of Colin having been the last one to see her. It's just not even a plan! Doesn't it seem so spontaneous - on the back end of the murder? It's like she didn't even think about it.
So I've seen a few references now to some sort of unusual intimate or sexual encounter between KA and CS that happened the night of the murder. Where does this detail come from? Has it been discussed at trial? And what's the story here?
In the context of striving for a sustainable world, from what I can gather a trend of 'fast fashion' seems to simply produce more unnecessary, cheaply made new items and uses up resources. It probably, Imoo, also helps sustain the status quo - the most underpaid workers producing high turnover, regularly disposable clothes for comfotably well off folk in western countries. MooI highlighted the aspect that these clothes are thrown away without being worn much, and the emphasis on owning many outfits. They are piling up in disadvantaged countries. There’s cachet in not buying those, thus the popularity of Patagonia and used clothing at REI.
FWIW I have Patagonia from the early ‘80’s, so it didn’t used to qualify as fast fashion, but now it’s a “thing” wrapped in all kinds of sustainability BS.
But, yeah, the fast fashion in the yoga sphere is contrary to everything yoga is supposed to be about.
There are so many ways to interpret CS’s comments IMO without qualifying them as elitist. I have similar sensibilities, but they certainly don’t come from an elitist place: I have seen the stuff piling up in poor countries.
FWIW I also doubt CS owns many outfits or “collections”.
I don't know whether to believe this guy or not. He did say earlier that he never fired his gun, but was this an act to "prove" even though he's not on trial, that he doesn't know how to load it, let alone fire it?
I agree with both points. Overall, as a society, we should focus on sustainable production and be looking at the future with less waste. I would never criticize someone for buying fast fashion, but I understand the comment. Plus, like anything, you buy something of high quality and it can last forever.But, yeah, the fast fashion in the yoga sphere is contrary to everything yoga is supposed to be about.
There are so many ways to interpret CS’s comments IMO without qualifying them as elitist. I have similar sensibilities, but they certainly don’t come from an elitist place: I have seen the stuff piling up in poor countries.
I see your point. What CS is wearing, or even doing outside of the courtroom, doesn’t matter in the grand scheme.Maybe that's what he feels comfortable wearing. Why does it matter?
Maybe the only thing we know about yoga in KA’s life is the yoga mat at the airport. Plus, two beach vacations in yoga-friendly communities, in CR and Bali.I agree with both points. Overall, as a society, we should focus on sustainable production and be looking at the future with less waste. I would never criticize someone for buying fast fashion, but I understand the comment. Plus, like anything, you buy something of high quality and it can last forever.
Regarding the yoga, there’s nothing remotely namaste about KA, which also adds an interesting aspect to her character in this trial. Is she truly a yoga instructor? Did she have a studio? I like yoga and have tried to “really” get into it, but im super anxious and non-chill, so I’ve never been able to commit like I need to.
CS is rude, condescending, and generally not likable, imo, but he didn’t pull the trigger. He did his job on the stand by establishing KA’s motive: her jealousy of his relationship with Mo, which KA saw as a love triangle. I am unsure if he will be called back to the stand? If not, we may have seen the last of him (unless he participates in victim impact statements at KA’s sentencing.)Contains video showing Strickland shoving a photographer outside the courthouse:
Last texts between cyclist & lover shown at Kaitlin Armstrong trial
Kaitlin Armstrong's former boyfriend continued his testimony against her on Monday as she faces murder charges in the death of Mo Wilson.www.dailymail.co.uk
News Nation says the jury will hear about his behavior. Not sure if they are correct, but that's what is said early in this video.No. Happened outside court. Jury is not supposed to see any of this.