DeDee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 7,344
- Reaction score
- 42,125
A killer's trial begins on Monday for a case I've followed since December 6, 2014; therefore, I must tread lightly. I will not risk being deemed worthy of a T/O by tiptoeing our TOS guidelines.
These comments are only an informed opinion. For 15 months, my POI was not correct. Hence, my present opinion could be incorrect.
Simple, bluesneakers. The investigation is complicated and connects deeper.
* Yes, Razz. My POI was a particular man. If, I have the proper SP in my line of vision, then, I am relieved it wasn't him or his wife.
* I went back to news stories, around the time, the dastardly deed was performed. Also, news videos regarding MB in that first week or so, were reviewed.
* Yes, again, if I am chasing the correct SPs tail, MB knew who her killer beforehand.
Thank you, WannaBDetective. You possess understanding.
Usually, in crimes of passion, in the heat of an impulsive moment, staging takes place after the murder.
This murder was premeditated. The exterior camera at the Porte Cochere was messed with prior to Monday morning. SP entered the Church with more than enough time to create the faux B&E scene by shattering glass, appearing on cctv to be attempting to breach an interior door, etc.
Also, I reviewed our earlier posts in this case. I reviewed what Jethro4WS wrote about SP appearing on camera, in the last scene of the video, posted yesterday. The object carried in SPs left hand triggered the recording of SP staging the scene. It was a critical mistake. MPD knew from that final scene of breaking glass, while SP is standing in the interior rather than outside of the building, that the CS was staged to appear as a B&E.
SP could not wait until after the murder to conduct the staging because of Campers arriving. SP was in position for the coup de grâce when MB entered the SW doors. SP wasn't down the hall fidgeting or around the corner still breaking glass. Further, recall the arrival time of the first CGs who remained in their vehicles for a few minutes before approaching the Porte Cochere. It is only my opinion that one of them may have seen a vehicle departing.
Ask yourself cui bono.
These comments are only an informed opinion. For 15 months, my POI was not correct. Hence, my present opinion could be incorrect.
If you think they have known SP's identity the entire time what do you think is taking them so long to make an arrest? What are they waiting for?
Simple, bluesneakers. The investigation is complicated and connects deeper.
Wow Dedee-I'm surprised to "hear" you say this. If I'm not mistaken, wasn't your prime suspect a man? What else has changed your mind? And was SP known to MB? Intriguing to say the least!
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
* Yes, Razz. My POI was a particular man. If, I have the proper SP in my line of vision, then, I am relieved it wasn't him or his wife.
* I went back to news stories, around the time, the dastardly deed was performed. Also, news videos regarding MB in that first week or so, were reviewed.
* Yes, again, if I am chasing the correct SPs tail, MB knew who her killer beforehand.
If you look at MPD timetables, there was ample time to create the mess and then get into position. IMO, she had to have been taken by surprise (to neither run or ward off her attacker.)
Thank you, WannaBDetective. You possess understanding.
Usually, in crimes of passion, in the heat of an impulsive moment, staging takes place after the murder.
This murder was premeditated. The exterior camera at the Porte Cochere was messed with prior to Monday morning. SP entered the Church with more than enough time to create the faux B&E scene by shattering glass, appearing on cctv to be attempting to breach an interior door, etc.
Also, I reviewed our earlier posts in this case. I reviewed what Jethro4WS wrote about SP appearing on camera, in the last scene of the video, posted yesterday. The object carried in SPs left hand triggered the recording of SP staging the scene. It was a critical mistake. MPD knew from that final scene of breaking glass, while SP is standing in the interior rather than outside of the building, that the CS was staged to appear as a B&E.
SP could not wait until after the murder to conduct the staging because of Campers arriving. SP was in position for the coup de grâce when MB entered the SW doors. SP wasn't down the hall fidgeting or around the corner still breaking glass. Further, recall the arrival time of the first CGs who remained in their vehicles for a few minutes before approaching the Porte Cochere. It is only my opinion that one of them may have seen a vehicle departing.
Ask yourself cui bono.
Cui bono, literally "to whose profit?" Could it also be translated to mean: "for whose benefit?" I declare that both interpretations apply here. I feel SP made a profit.