TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers,45, murdered in church/person in SWAT gear,18 Apr 2016 #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
If , a big if, LE clearly knows CT and AT are innocent but they are using them as a decoy as they continue investigating.....is that the norm? LE throws us a wayward hint (AT/CT) and everyone assumes the jealousy route. Then when LE makes their surprise arrest, make statements that they never mentioned AT/CT and everyone just made the incorrect assumption.
I guess if LE is hearing/seeing many of the CT/AT assumptions it isn't LE's responsibility to stop the assumptions with some public statement like "CT/AT cleared w no involvement" or something along those lines. I guess LE has to do what they have to do to get their (wo)man. If this is the case, it could put a shadow on them (AT/CT) for years and ruin their relationships and harm their long term income. I think LE has the general public just where they want/need us believing just what they want/need us to believe.
Maybe the LE non-deflection is one of our clue's.
 
Have we explored the possibility of a stalker? One maybe that Missy knew on a superficial level but that became obsessed or upset when their overtures were rejected. Possibly someone that is not on the radar of MSM and it sitting back laughing at the complete desecration of innocent people's reputation as well as MB and BBs & family. We've spent entire threads working every angle and what if all the info that has been released to the public is merely dead ends that the police had to explore. I'm leaning towards this theory (for the moment)....a man, maybe a current or former student of fire science at the nearby Navarro College, maybe owns a motorcycle and ATV, maybe works as a mechanic and very familiar with lots of different tools, maybe injured their right leg a few years ago....just a thought. MOO
 
After looking over MB & BB's FB profiles, could not see anywhere that BB ever had any type of involvement in his wife's fitness lifestyle.

Seems to me, since the perp wasn't bothered by a potential alarm going off, he/she knew this info. To me, that points to a trainer that has had to do the setting up of 5.00am classes at that Church. Would BB have known that?

Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk

Interesting observation which occurred to me also. I am not sure how germane it is or isn't to this case but find it an interesting curiosity from the perspective I frequently see male gym hounds and bodybuilder types with wives that have no interest in participating in the high intensity fitness lifestyle but I seldom see the opposite - a vigorously intense female trainer/participant who has a husband with seemingly a lack of any interest in the fitness lifestyle and appears to be somewhat sedentary. Perhaps it's his persistent health issues. Again just an observation and not sure if there is any relevance in his apparent fitness aversion.
 
If , a big if, LE clearly knows CT and AT are innocent but they are using them as a decoy as they continue investigating.....is that the norm? LE throws us a wayward hint (AT/CT) and everyone assumes the jealousy route. Then when LE makes their surprise arrest, make statements that they never mentioned AT/CT and everyone just made the incorrect assumption.
I guess if LE is hearing/seeing many of the CT/AT assumptions it isn't LE's responsibility to stop the assumptions with some public statement like "CT/AT cleared w no involvement" or something along those lines. I guess LE has to do what they have to do to get their (wo)man. If this is the case, it could put a shadow on them (AT/CT) for years and ruin their relationships and harm their long term income. I think LE has the general public just where they want/need us believing just what they want/need us to believe.
Maybe the LE non-deflection is one of our clue's

BBM
I am beginning to think this is exactly the case.
 
Has anyone else come across MB's other business FB page from 2014 (I think?) where she was selling denim jeans, shorts and skirts? Possibly their financial woes have been ongoing and not just recently.

Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk
 
One other thing CW ( the only name completely spelled out on the warrant) was originally not redacted and subsequently was. For the record, I think CW has nothing to do with Missy's murder but why was his name spelled out and no one else's? Why was his name ultimately redacted? Might there be someone else with a similar name out there in her friends list that fits the profile discussed here?
(I hope I side stepped that enough and it's within the TOS. Going to hit alert for mod to review)
 
If , a big if, LE clearly knows CT and AT are innocent but they are using them as a decoy as they continue investigating.....is that the norm? LE throws us a wayward hint (AT/CT) and everyone assumes the jealousy route. Then when LE makes their surprise arrest, make statements that they never mentioned AT/CT and everyone just made the incorrect assumption.
I guess if LE is hearing/seeing many of the CT/AT assumptions it isn't LE's responsibility to stop the assumptions with some public statement like "CT/AT cleared w no involvement" or something along those lines. I guess LE has to do what they have to do to get their (wo)man. If this is the case, it could put a shadow on them (AT/CT) for years and ruin their relationships and harm their long term income. I think LE has the general public just where they want/need us believing just what they want/need us to believe.
Maybe the LE non-deflection is one of our clue's.
I haven't seen any specualation about AT & CT outside of this forum. Have you?
 
Has anyone else come across MB's other business FB page from 2014 (I think?) where she was selling denim jeans, shorts and skirts? Possibly their financial woes have been ongoing and not just recently.

Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk

Maybe she was selling them because they didn't fit anymore?
 
Or someone affiliated with the Police, who would know if there was an alarm or not. JMO.
The city of Midlothian requires permits for alarms. The permit must be displayed in a location visible to first responders from outside the building.

No inside knowledge required.
 
I have and they are absolutely being trashed! It is terrible.
Where? I read the FB comments on any articles about the case. Everyone seems to think it's BB or RB. I haven't seen any comments about AT and CT.
 
If you want to make the husband and his family look guilty, you plan for when they're out of town.

Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not victim blaming.

MB seems to be the more out and about member of that marriage. Everyone keeps focusing on BB but to me it seems more likely Missy was sorta leading her own life. I now see how his first interviews look strange because he knew all this would come out.

In one interview he said (and I'm paraphrasing) "if she saw someone in a police uniform she would think..."

Think what? Early morning rendezvous?

Jmo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
This has been brought up a few times before and tickles my brain...

Could MB or BB been having an affair with someone in LE and the reason for all the agencies involved is that the uniform and equipment used was legit? Did any spouses of LE attend Missy's classes? Anyone live near the church?

As to the gait...injury from breaking in? Former leg injury? Some sort of head injury that effects motor skills?

Just new ideas to ponder.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe that is something that is surely being looked at. jmo
 
If you want to make the husband and his family look guilty, you plan for when they're out of town.

Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not victim blaming.

MB seems to be the more out and about member of that marriage. Everyone keeps focusing on BB but to me it seems more likely Missy was sorta leading her own life. I now see how his first interviews look strange because he knew all this would come out.

In one interview he said (and I'm paraphrasing) "if she saw someone in a police uniform she would think..."

Think what? Early morning rendezvous?

Jmo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This has always been on my "list" I keep for myself too. I have always wondered if she was planning to meet someone there early and that's why it wasn't a red flag on a car in the parking lot or someone already being inside.....
 
This has always been on my "list" I keep for myself too. I have always wondered if she was planning to meet someone there early and that's why it wasn't a red flag on a car in the parking lot or someone already being inside.....

Maybe the scorned wife drove her hubby's car while he was on duty? Jmo
 
Interesting observation which occurred to me also. I am not sure how germane it is or isn't to this case but find it an interesting curiosity from the perspective I frequently see male gym hounds and bodybuilder types with wives that have no interest in participating in the high intensity fitness lifestyle but I seldom see the opposite - a vigorously intense female trainer/participant who has a husband with seemingly a lack of any interest in the fitness lifestyle and appears to be somewhat sedentary. Perhaps it's his persistent health issues. Again just an observation and not sure if there is any relevance in his apparent fitness aversion.

I don't think his non-involvement in fitness has a direct link to the case, but perhaps an indication that they were growing apart in personal interests. That is not a criticism as it's normal in the course of a long marriage. Sometimes the growing apart leads to loneliness and estrangement, and other times it can lead to a deeper friendship and mutual respect.

I have a hunch BB was lonely and felt left out of her changing lifestyle....but I am not convinced those feelings made him want her gone off the earth. I'm just not seeing that. JMO

Opinion, subject to change.
 
Hmmm interesting. I'm assuming the speculation is because of the resemblance between CT and the perp in the black and white pic?

Doesn't seem like there's much to go off other than their trash being searched.
There are several pics they're going by. Last I looked another female in the SW was getting some attention.

Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk
 
Called whom?

I think that was answering my question.......that BB called his mother after a camper called him. Just wonder if the camper told him "accident" or if that's just what he told his mother. Camper would not have said car wreck, but possibly said "accident", although if the camper actually saw Missy, they would have known that it was no accident, JMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
211
Guests online
247
Total visitors
458

Forum statistics

Threads
608,860
Messages
18,246,524
Members
234,471
Latest member
Starpoint09
Back
Top