I can't make my brain make sense of the the recordings being out of sequence. If the times on the cameras are the same then put them in order of the time.
When I read that her truck was seen driving into the parking lot then they have everybody that drove into that parking lot.
JMHO,
Everything depends on the location of each individual camera. Whether it was interior CoC camera...what area of the CoC ea individual camera was video capturing the motion. We are told that the assualt was not captured because "motion was not detected and camera did not record" (paraphrasing, cant remb exact wording of Captain Spann) OR whether it was possibly SWFA surveillance camera that gives MPD the 416 a.m.
In the Official Press Release... you notice they do not list the "last time" Suspect seen, only the First... all information is vague for a reason.. *where does the 420 come from? Did MB go in at 418, back out and back in again at 420? again, this is given to us in the Official Press Release, as with the 416, yet no explanation as to specifically the time stamp came from. **this is from MPD, not from MSM. 418am of MB first seen walking in, was given first from April 18 Press Conf, and in each of the SW. So that time is set in stone as her entrance. Each time give should have documented time source (dispatched/arrival on scene so forth)
My point/confusion/questioning is, MSM are just assuming that these were from the interior CoC camera. But MPD is not giving specific camera locations (that I have seen specifically stated) ONLY a timeline for the 416am . May seem petty, but if you think about it. They could have little bits of other information that when they get all their evidence it will all tie together. They could have specific things on video that the Suspect does not know they have. Things only the Suspect would know....We do not know what all the Interior Cameras show. only spliced 2.27 min ...MPD has it all. JMHO and I will drop it
IF surveillance video of MB "truck driving into parking lot"
where is the source location of this video survellance camera
Possibilities:
1) was it the interior CoC video camera? is driving into the parking lot meaning driving thru the parking lot or under the covered awning where truck found? I have hard time thinking this is where this particular time stamp video came from, because of the sensitivity of motion detection. *remember camera did not pick up MB movement walking down hallway, as to why the assault was not allegedly captured. We do not know where that camera is located though. If it was same camera filming or changing to another area camera area, that didn't pick up motion* If it picked up every car light that hit the area, Then they should have again all the other vehicles coming into the parking lot. *which they very well could have* Hopefully so. It would be different if the outside camera's were working. That would be purpose of exterior camera, not the interior cameras. JMHO
OR
2) was it from surveillance video possibly from SWFA? They had the area businesses videos on Monday April 18. It would be very easy, if nothing else knowing that MB walked into CoC at 418am.. looking at SWFA video, they could look at prior time and if nothing else see her truck drive by SWFA, and turn (taillights/headlights turning into the CoC driveway) That could give them the "time stamp" of MB truck on surveillance driving into parking lot. IF was from SWFA do they see other vehicles (lights?) turning into CoC driveway at any point? Should have.
3) where was this camera? Interior CoC or SWFA?
April 19, 2016
Johnson said a vehicle can be seen on the video may belong to the killer, but there's not enough information to give the public. "Theres one surveillance camera where you can see the car in the far corner of the frame, parked in the distance. You can't make out a plate, and we're not even comfortable releasing anything about a possible make or model, Johnson said.
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Po...idlothian-Murder-Investigation-376269831.html