was NOT in disguise when first broke in? Or was in the SWAT disguise.
I have been wondering about something 'similar', which is :
(1.) "Where" did this person put that garb on at (and, when).
(2.) Did this person drive down the road, while wearing it? (may not have had the helmet on, at the time.)
(3.) If this person, came from 'their home', to there
> and put the garb on, at home <
...does anyone else live at the home?
In that scenerio,
wouldn't it/or, why wouldn't it,
seem a bit "odd",
that the person
(even if the other person, who lived at the home,
knew, that this person had an interest in such things),
put that garb on
> at that time of the morning <,
leave the home, wearing it.
This case occurred,
and has been all over the news, and continues to be.
````````
Another thing I have been wondering about:
- If this person really does have an interest in that type of clothing (tactical-type gear. The vest said "Police" on it),
- If this person really does "walk that way"
(- If this person was living with a "spouse",
was the "spouse" at home, when this case occurred?
...where did they think their "other half" was at (or, was "supposed" to be at)
The person (perp) was "not at home"
when this case occurred.
(They were, here.)
[And did this person (perp) have any friends?
"friend"(s) cannot tell who this person is? (??)]
If perp really does "walk that way",
I don't understand how family (and friends) do not "recognize" that.
(and if the person was living with a "spouse")
(1.) They "walk" that way
+
(2.) They were "not at home"
(at the time that this case occurred)
[and if they know their spouse has that type of garb (tactical-gear),
then it's]
+
3.
(as well)
[Might possibly be able to "add"-on some other factors, as well.]
```````
Police stated: They believe someone knows something.
(But do they "know" that they know something,
or
have they not "snapped" to it.) (At least, as of yet.)
(Or,
can't believe it.
Are in "denial".)