Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't agree with any of this. She didn't work at the church and wouldn't have been alone "all day." Have you read the facts of the case?
MB held her classes at CC. Hence, it was her place (aka location) of employment. I did not say she was employed by CC. MB was a homeschooling mom so as soon as she returned to her house after her 5:00 class she would have had at least one of her children with her for the rest of the day. Please let me know where you think I am mistaken.
Oh I'm sorry. I totally misunderstood. I thought you meant she would have been alone all day at the church. I understand now what you mean.
I agree with yu. To your point, doesn't LE say when investigating a murder that they start from the inside (people closest and most known by the victim) and work outwards. They want to eliminate those known by the victim first.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
I was thinking that LE said the injuries were consistent of the tools left at the scene. JMO MHO
I said that the "MB case doesn't involve violence in the home", and that is an accurate statement. Every bit of information released and sleuthed about this case gives zero indication of any violence. If anything were to come out later then I would have to change the wording of that statement. But just like (for example) the use of drugs in the home, it's accurate to say that the MB case does not involve these things. If we could only discuss the things that have been 100% definitively ruled out, we would have nothing to discuss.We do not know if there was or was not violence in the home. You've stated this pretty clearly, and unless you have access to information not yet available this seems like another example of how suppositions morph into facts. Domestic violence isn't ruled out just because BB is not a suspect. Then again, we don't have a suspect list, nor should we. To be clear, I'm not suggesting BB is involved. I am saying your post is more opinion than fact.
I actually don't find this case super bizarre or unusual. Am I the only one? Aside from the swat gear, nothing sticks out at me.
Since I believe that this was a targeted killing, the church isn't odd. It was MB's place of employment, and it's the only place where she would have been alone all day.
The May 3rd search warrant specifically states that she "had multiple puncture wounds found on her head and chest [that] are consistent with the tools that the suspect was carrying throughout the building." Maybe another search warrant indicates "tools left at the scene," but this one specifies that these were carried by the murdered. So it doesn't necessarily mean a hammer. There are many "tools" that can cause puncture wounds, and in MHO, a the claw part of a hammer would not necessarily cause deep puncture wounds, like some other tools might.
"Evidence" seen through the filter of bias. I have seen too many times, public opinion go toward conspiracies and complicated connections - anything but the simpleness of being killed by a stranger.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The May 3rd search warrant specifically states that she "had multiple puncture wounds found on her head and chest [that] are consistent with the tools that the suspect was carrying throughout the building." Maybe another search warrant indicates "tools left at the scene," but this one specifies that these were carried by the murdered. So it doesn't necessarily mean a hammer. There are many "tools" that can cause puncture wounds, and in MHO, a the claw part of a hammer would not necessarily cause deep puncture wounds, like some other tools might.
I'm with you for the first half of that post. As of a few weeks ago, I began being more open to the second unsub theory. Either in the building (off camera) or not. SP doesn't look capable of the door destruction and a guaranteed take down of MB, and if I'm SP, I'd be pretty afraid I'd get that hammer (or tool) turned back on me (if I was by myself).Yes, GA_Peach! For instance, if there were two unsubs (unknown subjects) then they may have expected two people to set up the camp, ie., Missy and one other, who may have backed out for some unknown reason to us, at the last minute. That way, it would be two killers against two victims who were unaware of danger lurking inside the church when they opened for campers that fateful morning. That's my theory and opinion, at this time, which may change without advance notice.
I won't go over the stats everyone else posted again that being killed by a stranger is a lot less likely than being murdered by someone you know, to me the additional facts that make a stranger murder unlikely are 1) the creepy LinkedIn message, 2) a friend saying that Missy wasn't acting normal lately, and 3) the unbelievably coincidental timing of her murder. There can only be so many coincidences that lead up to "wrong place at the wrong time" murder.
Thank you, cfreyja23. In your opinion, is a gun one of those "tools?"
Also, since you are a verified attorney in Texas, do you believe the lack of recent info from LE to be consistent with other local cases? Could the FBI's role be leading local LE in that direction?
So many questions! Thanks.
rsbm3) the unbelievably coincidental timing of her murder. There can only be so many coincidences that lead up to "wrong place at the wrong time" murder.
rsbm
Personally, I don't see the timing as being 'unbelievably coincidental'.
Really? I read all your posts- but surprised that the early am time frame- getting in/out, killing MB before (presumably) first camper arrives is quite unbelievably coincidental. Hmm...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
rsbm
Personally, I don't see the timing as being 'unbelievably coincidental'.