BaxterDE42
Active Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2012
- Messages
- 141
- Reaction score
- 156
This one caught my attention (1) because her facial structure is spot-on, and (2) because she had her appendix removed (as did the UID).
Joanne Catherine Foley
The Doe Network: Case File 2876DFON
Her vital stats are within reasonable bounds. The lag between Joanne's DLC and the UID's death is about 4 months. The big question would be whether the body was decomposed enough from a 1-2 weeks postmortem interval to not be able to see the devil tattooed on her back.
Also, DoeNet says that Joanne had both a Cesarean scar and an appendectomy scar, whereas NamUs and DoeNet indicate just one scar on the UID.
I have not followed this case or the thread so if it is resolved please pardon my bringing it forward. In searching something (possibly) related, I read the post and want to comment on the single scar in a cesarean delivery and subsequent appendectomy if that was he case in MP identifiers.
According to NCBI.gov and other medical resources ..."There are three main reasons to perform an incidental appendectomy (at the time of cesarean section): To reduce future mortality and morbidity from appendicitis in women of childbearing age; to eliminate undiagnosed incidental pathology in the appendix; and to eliminate the appendix from diagnostic consideration when the patient presents with abdominal or pelvic complaints"...
Also worth noting it is common practice to remove the appendix in other abdominal surgeries i.e, cholecystectomy.
If this information is no longer relevant to this case, it could prove useful or applicable to others.