wcasewatch
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2022
- Messages
- 227
- Reaction score
- 1,594
If you read through the missing persons threads here, you'll see a lot of cases as you say, but also case after case where family insists they reported their loved one missing and LE doesn't have a record. Or it's just a line in a police log, or it was in a state where reports of runaway minors were purged when the minor turned 21, or the police filled it out but never did anything with it but file it in a cabinet and forget about it.
Even if there was a report filed, and the LE agency took it seriously and tried to find her, it doesn't mean the old record was ever uploaded to any centralized database. I've seen an estimate that only about 10-15% of the missing people in Massachusetts are even in the state database, never mind the national ones, and we're not the only state with that problem. Archived records have been destroyed by accident in fires, floods, tornadoes, and hurricanes, and deliberately when sheer volume forces archives to be removed.
You're likely right that she was at least a part time sex worker, but that in no way implies she wasn't reported missing.
The task force has been scraping well below the surface of any centralized database. They're not running searches on the Doe Network. A line in a police log with two names and a set of ages would be enough for them to hone in on Peaches. Many families did report their loved ones missing, but were met with hesitancy from LE. Karen Vergata and Valerie Mack are good examples of this. Regardless, my initial point still stands. If Peaches was officially reported missing, she would have been easier to find. Either she wasn't reported missing, or the relevant LE agency refused take her disappearance seriously. IMO, if Peaches was a regular "civilian" with a child, such a report would have been taken more seriously.