one thing that is a consideration is her phone..now cell phones log onto a cell tower/s in the area so first if the phone had gone out the area,say newcastle then that would be logged.so presumably it stayed within the york area.there were less cell towers then and i believe a cell logs on to more than one so u can tell an area its in as in triangulation but even if it logged onto one tower then u have an effective working radius .ok that may be a biggish area but it give u an area and if the cell is moving around york or staying in the location of the cell tower/s..ok the phone may have been separate from claudia but if u first assume it was with her it gives u possible locations a body could be.ok she could be anywhere but if u work on the fact she was murdered then u look for logical places in that area a body could be where it has not been found say by dog walkers ect.again of course she could have been killed,kept in say the boot of a car and then the phone switched off the next day and driven god knows where..i went for a look at the area. the report of a woman and a man having an argument near a park,if she was killed there it doesnt really work.its used a lot and u would have to assume the killer pre planned it and came equipped with a shovel ready to bury her as its the only way i could see she hasnt been found there..if someone was gona do that then perhaps they set it up before hand,shovel hidden ect as like i say its a bit public and surrounded by houses.that time in the morning u still have the early morning dog walkers ect..so maybe still killed her there but took the body away,bit public at that time but not impossible..its back to the phone and cell towers.because they were arguing then if say she was killed in a rage,thinking of her phone wouldnt be the first thing more an after thought so if the phone stayed in the area then ur looking for a quiet place to bury a body.again it could be she was kept in a car and the killer waited till they had hatched a plan and then realised about the phone and switched it off.doubt we could ever see the cell tower info its still evidence..they say the phone powered down but does that mean it just couldnt log onto a cell tower or can they tell its switched off as in the phone says im logging off???
now another bit of usles info.the video of the man walking round the back of the houses.i went and looked..when he walks back past the house window,up to the right is a distictive black slab in the house bricks.below it is a airvent.now im 6"1 and a half and the top of my head is level with the bottom of the vent..the guy is somewat below that as i judge it..ive included a pic so judge urselfs how tall he is..
another thing,he is out of view 60 seconds ish,it takes 10 seconds to the allyway(walked it) and say another 10 to claudias house(didnt walk it its private) then 10 seconds back down the ally way and 10 seconds into view thats 20 seconds..that leaves 20 seconds to do something...now its assumed claudia was in the house as she talked to her parents a little while later so if its claudias rucksack she must have given it to him..seems an odd thing to do if u stay in the house..of course we dont know for sure she was in her house,she could have been say round the corner in another house(back to cell towers if her phone swapped towers or not as to how far away she was) and realised she hadnt got her ruck sack,the guy goes for it knowing where it is as she told him and has her house keys.its plausible but means she wasnt at home.
last thing and its just the psycic report..
I could see a road with lots of trees and a ditch.Then I felt I was walking down towards a solitary white house.that she has come to harm in an isolated wood after being snatched by “a male friend”.
again the cell towers,is this place in the area covered by the tower she was logged on to?..i had a nosey at the woods by the park and ride and in real life as compared to google earth they are reasonably big and a ditch runs along one side.the white house? well theres a cell tower there and the little building with the equipment in next to the tower is light grey..if u look on google earth look at historical image 2007 cos its very different today,back then there wasnt the roads ect at the rear of the woods and u could park next to the woods..(its odd but she might not have to be buried.there is another mystery murder called the nude in the nettles.a womans body was found by the side of an area used as a layby.she wasnt buried but her remains were found in undergrowth 2 years later..the only report of something fishy was a horse rider saying he smelt a bad smell but ignored it as next to farm land.no ne else noticed the remains despite being feet from where people had picnics and some evidence showed that at some point some one must have stepped over them to dump some bottles!!the remains were skeletal and wild animals had eaten and removed some..) .she is said to be 89% right?? ok bit far fetched but i drove round and if u were looking for a place to hide a body then apart from under concrete of the university this is really the only remote place with woods....the phone of course was either taken away or maybe just failed as in rain water or something..mind u it didnt rain on the night or following day she went missing in york.
.
..note to self dont be specific 
