Wouldn't he go out and celebrate with her though?
She was literally in America when he went missing. Had been for a week or so.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't he go out and celebrate with her though?
I think they decided to keep it quiet from the outset as the stress on the girl may have given her a misscarriage. They probably thought its best to keep it all quiet, say he was single until the girl had the scans and everything was ok. Dont blame them for doing this at all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She was and was asked by the raf lads if she had seen or heard from him.She was literally in America when he went missing. Had been for a week or so.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Almost certainly released to generate "chatter" for GeoSpatial analysis.
That's the point I am making. You can't. But the driver could fill in the gaps but we are only given general information. We are given 4 am BSE and 4:30 am BM. So the slowest you could go is constantly moving, for 12 miles roughly for 30 minutes. too slow for a truck, too fast for walking. But we don't know if there was actually 20 minutes or if stops were made, or if there were cows in the road, etc. The driver could explain it all. And of course there might be actual data for when the phone reached cell sites and lost others. The police have no obligation to share, but just to say it moved from point A to point B in 30 minutes too fast for walking, leaves a universe of possibilities. Why do they leave it so ambiguous? The driver can clear it all up nicely. And then they could say we are convince it was or was not in the lorry. end of story.
If they can say without equivocation it was NOT in the lorry, then that changes everything.
You really expect people not to comment on this? It is a reason for all that C did on that Fri/Sat and is completely relevant to everything since IMHO. TW q & a is forgotten in an instance. This is much more relevant and there will be 90k more questions to come. You cannot keep the lid on forever.
What's been put up on what website?
How dis she know that he was missing and not just out on a jolly?She was and was asked by the raf lads if she had seen or heard from him.
She then came home.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.da...-missing-RAF-serviceman-reveals-pregnant.html
Sent from my HTC Desire 626 using Tapatalk
I've read all the previous threads and can see that alot of hard work and thought have gone into everything. Well done [emoji106]Here here. Fresh eyes and ideas are always welcome, but please do read the months of hard work undertaken to get to the statements made most recently.
If you read the news report and watch the forces video she states that the raf lads contacted her.How dis she know that he was missing and not just out on a jolly?
You think? That's something I would not have thought of. V. Good point.Almost certainly released to generate "chatter" for GeoSpatial analysis.
Absolutely awful outcome if so. Yes on holiday in America.She was away wasn't she? This could have been his first weekend off since finding out. Will be awful if he has just had an accident on the way home after celebrating that news.
A week or so back I took the stance that he had gone AWOL and I still am half thinking that.
I have just watched the forces video and it was stated that the RAF lads contacted April about Corrie missing. If Nicola knew about April would she not contact her? I suspect Nicola never knew about April.
I wouldn't blame them either but I'm not quite comfortable with the lying that would entail.
I'm not family bashing but as a general point if you have a huge public wave of support I think you owe it to them to be truthful and by that I don't mean tell the whole truth but only tell the truth
JMO