Spurslass63
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2016
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
So two Americans in the frame...but only 1 accounted for? The one based at Honington..wonder where he was that night?.
The way I understand it is this <modsnip>:
1. USAF takeaway guy is the 'rock/paper/scissors' guy who is probably Mildenhall based.
2. A different American RAF guy is Corrie's work colleague.
Mine too @Inside...I think I will stick with my impulsive AWOL theory now instead of looking for other theories :/ :footinmouth:because it totally blows my previous theory to bits :facepalm:
Mine too @Inside...I think I will stick with my impulsive AWOL theory now instead of looking for other theories :/ :footinmouth:
That's my other theory but for me it's a stretch at best, albeit better than the bin lorry.
I have my reasons for sticking to my theory including Mildenhall base but ill keep them to myself as can't back it up with a source x
So it was actually a complete stranger he played Rock Paper Scissors with and he left the take away with him or at the same time as him?<modsnip>
Having read back over the find Corrie Web site it has the black top guy from mama mias as a stranger.
So it was actually a complete stranger he played Rock Paper Scissors with and he left the take away with him or at the same time as him?
If it's a theory it's welcome her provided it's clearly marked as your opinion and not fact
There is a mention that he leaves with himSays on the official time line that he was a stranger yes, no mention of leaving together on there.
To go into why I think what I do I'd need to elude to somewhere that's off limits so it's a no go for now x
The more I sit and take a back seat observing this case, the more baffled I am. Just when I think I've finally cemented a concrete conclusion, three hours later my mind is changed again.We've had it all; Terrorism, alien abduction, suicide, drowning, CCTV evasion, escape by drains, AWOL, extended leave, Platform 9 & 3/4s. Now it seems just as we're getting somewhere, it's suggested that Corrie gave a lift into BSE to someone in his car! Where the hell did that curve ball come from at such a late moment?
Additional to that, someone's just pointed out that Corrie's American friend (not the rock, paper, scissors guy) was not with him that night which was unusual! So are we now going down a route of 'additional American friend' collected Corrie in his car from Mildenhall for a liaison? If so, I can modify my thought process again to accommodate!?!?? Frustrating ain't the word.
If I'm now to accept this latest proposal and factor in all the BM mast pings, Mildenhall link, no forensic struggle, one way street incident, suggested gay tendencies etc....it's looking to me like it's gone from unintentional AWOL to possible sex act gone wrong!
Rant over!
/
There is a mention that he leaves with him
' He leaves the takeaway with Corrie, before Corrie is seen on the CCTV walking towards Brentgovel Street on his own.
http://www.findcorrie.co.uk/2016/10/21/suffolk-police-21st-october-3rd-update/
That's the problem Pink puma when you arent told things from the start...
I have been leaning towards the Awol option for a few weeks,when things didn't start adding up...
Would rather that be the case than any other options that have been discussed..
The point about the CCTV is that "it's impossible" for him to leave, without being seem on "the combination" of cameras.
I suspect this has been tested (and is proven) by the police...and by others including RAF resources.
And so we have "the three cars" (no time or other data released).
Key to all this is the constant statements (pretty much form day one) of whether he left "willingly or unwillingly".
A wait suggests a meeting.
But a meeting does not suggest "willingly or unwillingly" leaving.
That depends upon the meeting. And even then there are caveats.
Reading back through early articles on Corrie's disappearance, I'm still troubled by this comment: "Prior to the Major Investigation Team taking control of this investigation the family felt incredibly safe that everything was being done it was being treated “as a homicide, without evidence or body” as police were already “99.9% certain Corrie had not left on foot, and had been unable to return of his own accord”. This is a Major Investigation Team in name not function.”
http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/we_all_s..._investigation_into_corrie_mckeague_1_4761713
What would make them think it was a homicide, without evidence or body? This was back on 3 November - have the police been working a lead for the last 4-5 weeks, which may explain why the pod was not a priority.