I've been thinking about what someone mentioned earlier, about Corrie possibly using his phone without sending any messages (i think it was in the context of waiting for a ride from someone but I can't remember the original post to quote it).
Now I am a 29 year old female so maybe I am different to Corrie, but if I am sitting in the car with someone and chatting, especially someone I know, I'd probably be scrolling through my phone out of habit. I might also do it if I was in a car with a stranger if I felt awkward, just to keep my hands busy. I wouldn't be texting anyone but I would probably be 'liking' things. That activity is easy enough to check. You don't even need to access to someones account on Instagram to see what they've liked and the date. You just need to be following them.
Now if I got into a car against my will, either because I was forced or I passed out and someone saw an opportunity to abduct me, it goes without saying I wouldn't be using my phone.
I probably wouldn't be using my phone either if I was walking home in the dark. I might use it as a torch but I wouldn't be scrolling through Instagram and liking photos If I was trying to get home as quickly as possible.
Now the part that has depressed me. If Corrie did walk home and had an accident it would have to be something like passing out and succumbing to hypothermia or something that was over very quickly. Because if he had his phone within reach and broke a leg or something he would have been able to contact someone. He would also have had access to gps if lost, unless he was completely disorientated.
Anyway I wonder if police have looked into his activity beyond pings and sent messages. Activity, or the lack of it, on his social media counts could give us some clues to what actions he took that night.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
