JuicyLucy
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2021
- Messages
- 1,491
- Reaction score
- 10,384
There are a lot of defendants in this case and it's not clear exactly who knew whom or how, so I've just done a summary of what's known, taken from the court reporting, in the hope it will make discussion easier.
There are phone records before the event of:
- The grey Audi TT was Mahek Bukhari's loan car (her normal car was off the road). It contained M Bukhari (daughter), A Bukhari (mother), Patel and Karwan. Karwan was driving at the time of the crash.
- The blue Seat Leon was Natasha Akhtar's and contained Akhtar, Gulamustafa, R Jamal and A Jamal. The two Jamals are cousins. R Jamal was driving at the time of the crash. The Seat sustained front damage, allegedly from having rammed the victims' car from behind.
There are phone records before the event of:
- M Bukhari calling Karwan
- Akhtar calling R Jamal
- R Jamal calling Karwan
- M Bukhari calling R Jamal
- The Jamals, Karwan and Patel all went together to a phone shop to dispose of their phones after the event.
- M Bukhari denied knowing Akhtar but was seen on CCTV with her on the night of the crash.
- Patel admitted in questioning to being asked to join in by R Jamal.
- Gulammustafa admitted in questioning to socialising with Akhtar and R Jamal, and that the three of them then went to Karwan's home. He denied knowing the Bukharis, who he said came separately to Karwan's home.