I know, bless their hearts - all I can say is, the local rag clearly doesn't pay them a wardrobe allowance, lol!
Gotta say, going by the video reports, all these reporters only look about 12 years old anyway. View attachment 109426
My issue with this case is that there is a lot that doesn't add up. How can it be proved that it was IS and not another person at the property. These statements are starting make me thing if IS didn't do it then one the sons must have. With that conjecture, perhaps IS is just trying to protect them.
Who knows, all I feel is that there's not enough concrete proof to put it all on him!
I know, bless their hearts - all I can say is, the local rag clearly doesn't pay them a wardrobe allowance, lol!
Both sons have ironclad alibis. Jamie spent Sunday night at the Royston home and went to work on Monday. Oliver spent Sunday night at his girlfriend's place and was also at work on Monday.
The police would obviously have verified that they both attended work on Monday.
It is uncontested that the only people in the house on the day Helen was killed, Monday April 11, were Helen and IS - so only IS could have done it. I feel sure if there was any question of involvement by either of the two sons, the police would have charged them. However I feel more certain than ever that both sons have been economical with the truth in their evidence, to protect their father.
I'm another lurker coming out of the woodwork today ��
I've been reading avidly since last summer and would like to add my thanks to you all for your informative and insightful posts. Also for the flashes of gallows humour!
A (rather macabre) point regarding Helen's phone and bank account: if she had a recent iPhone or iPad with iTouch, and the Barclays app installed, IS could have gained access to her account merely by touching her finger/thumb to the 'home' button. Log in details, passwords, PINs not required...
PC Richard Webster attended Royston in response to the missing person report. He testified,
There was a BMW parked on the driveway, a jeep parked to the left of the front door facing towards the BMW and a Fiat 500 was in the garage behind the house.
It is uncontested that the only people in the house on the day Helen was killed, Monday April 11, were Helen and IS - so only IS could have done it. I feel sure if there was any question of involvement by either of the two sons, the police would have charged them. However I feel more certain than ever that both sons have been economical with the truth in their evidence, to protect their father.
I'm another lurker coming out of the woodwork today 🐛
I've been reading avidly since last summer and would like to add my thanks to you all for your informative and insightful posts. Also for the flashes of gallows humour!
A (rather macabre) point regarding Helen's phone and bank account: if she had a recent iPhone or iPad with iTouch, and the Barclays app installed, IS could have gained access to her account merely by touching her finger/thumb to the 'home' button. Log in details, passwords, PINs not required...
Don't know about anyone else, but crikey I've found today really stressful so far :scared: Ridiculous I know, but so many times I want to shout out "No that isn't correct" at the updates from the court.
!