FiestyFairy
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 1
Well that's it. No TM! No sobbing woman?
I can't wait to hear the judges direction to the jury
I can't wait to hear the judges direction to the jury
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well this is all very sudden! I wonder if it's because VT has done so poorly on the stand over the past few days.
Does anyone know - if he does get found guilty of murder but appeal - could the police/family/journos release information that had been held back so as not to 'prejudice' his case? or would they have to hold back until after his appeal?
There is the distinct possibility that VT knew Joanna would be alone and that he deliberately did not attend the party with his girlfriend because he had other plans.
... knickers were in the hallway. Either Joanna normally left her knickers on the pedestal in the hallway, or Mr VT skarfed her knickers and left them in the hallway. The latter suggests murder, the former suggests VT wandered into a strange situation.
I think he must have known that she was on her own probably from the LL. I believe she was stalked the minute she came out of Waitrose and there must be CCTV coverage to show this. When she arrived home she had time to take off her shoes and coat with him still lurking outside and peeping in the window. At that point I think he took his opportunity either, he had a key or he knocked on the door, then he pounced on her . Can't understand why the possibility of him stalking and the fact that it maybe him on CCTV coverage in the store was not brought up in court. More to this then will ever be allowed to know I suspect. The whole thing stinks to me .
I think this is more about getting off on asphyia , like the prosection intimated.
So would I like to know the answers to those questions.
How utterly bizarre! William Clegg said something along the lines of "that's as far as we can go today" after Dr Cary had taken the stand & they knocked off even earlier than usual! Surely, if it had only been intended that that statement was read, they could have fitted it in before close of play Friday?
Not sure why anybody thought TM would be a witness.
The prosecution don't need her to prove he lied and manipulated her as he admits he did that
The defence were unlikey to get her to testify to VT's movements/good character etc
I think they were drying on the radiator and got knocked off either by a struggle or by the comings and goings of VT with her body. He probably picked them up and bunged them on the pedestal/console* as part of his clean-up when he turned the oven off, etc.
*Is anyone else having trouble imagining this thing? A small table? A plant stand???
I didn't expect her to be a witness but I was hoping she would be called even as a hostile witness. Seems I am to be disappointed![]()
How utterly bizarre! William Clegg said something along the lines of "that's as far as we can go today" after Dr Cary had taken the stand & they knocked off even earlier than usual! Surely, if it had only been intended that that statement was read, they could have fitted it in before close of play Friday?