edgedweller
Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2011
- Messages
- 346
- Reaction score
- 6
Surely that would take up the width of half the hallway though?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't know someone had taken the stand. Then stood down? Who is Dr Cary? An expert witness for the defence or the prosecution? The name seems familiar but I just can't remember who he or she is.
On the Friday it was "that's as far as we can go this afternoon"; today it's "'my lord that concludes the case for the defence" after a couple of hours of 'legal argument'. As I said before, I suspect the defence tried to initiate Plan B and the judge said 'No'.
I must admit I'm quite surprised though. I expected the defence to at least drag up some old professor from Eindhoven prepared to tell us what a nice chap the defendant was etc.
Didn't know someone had taken the stand. Then stood down? Who is Dr Cary? An expert witness for the defence or the prosecution? The name seems familiar but I just can't remember who he or she is.
Didn't know someone had taken the stand. Then stood down?
Who is Dr Cary?
Expert witness for the defence - pathologist who performed a post-mortem on JY's body. Although he didn't say much in defence!!!
Didn't know someone had taken the stand. Then stood down? Who is Dr Cary? An expert witness for the defence or the prosecution? The name seems familiar but I just can't remember who he or she is.
Dr Nat Cary is the pathologist for the Defence. He testified last Friday
All that happened this morning was they read a statement from Geoffrey Hardiman, who lives on the top floor of No 44. It said he heard nothing.
I seem to remember that the media reported at the time that he was asleep in bed and also hard of hearing but I guess the jury might not know that
Ah yes, I remember him. He did give detailed evidence last week. I didn't know he was being called again today. I thought maybe we'd hear from another pathologist who did a third pm - Dr White, I think.
Yes, thanks. I remember him now. I thought he'd finished last week.
Yes, thanks. I remember him now. I thought he'd finished last week.
On the Friday it was "that's as far as we can go this afternoon"; today it's "'my lord that concludes the case for the defence" after a couple of hours of 'legal argument'. As I said before, I suspect the defence tried to initiate Plan B and the judge said 'No'.
I must admit I'm quite surprised though. I expected the defence to at least drag up some old professor from Eindhoven prepared to tell us what a nice chap the defendant was etc.
Ah yes, I remember him. He did give detailed evidence last week. I didn't know he was being called again today.
All that happened this morning was they read a statement from Geoffrey Hardiman, who lives on the top floor of No 44. It said he heard nothing.
I seem to remember that the media reported at the time that he was asleep in bed and also hard of hearing but I guess the jury might not know that
He did, my point was that after he finished, the defence(Clegg) said that was as far as they could go that afternoon but if they'd planned to read Hardyman's statement as their last submission before the summing up, then why not do so on the Friday? It only took 5 minutes after all!
is it possible that Tabak could change his plea to guilty to murder in return for a shorter sentence?