If the victim of the assault is in witness protection he’s presumably not being protected from John. So who is he being protected from?
Yes, exactly! Putting someone in the witness protection programme costs thousands - and not to mention it uproots lives.
We does he (the person who was assaulted) need to be put into WP in the first place?!
This is usually reserved for top-end cases of really heavy duty stuff.
Something strange is going on here.
But what?