Good point. I would presume some in Milton Keynes have vanished previously without trace (but only a presumption), and as you correctly point out that doesn’t mean they have familiarity in such a wide open case.
She could have equally been taken in to a house, because it looks easy enough on the suggested path she took. I had wondered this also.
Once her phone was off....there’s nothing
That abduction occurred near the A5 and Furzton lake is near the A5 on Leah's walking route to work.
Still your point tells us nothing about what happens to her.
That’s an interesting point I assume LE can tell the difference with the help from mobile service providers. If it went out of signal I would have thought some software (or similar termed) components would still be functioning in the background. Which if that’s the case would help to tell the difference.
I read that article also yes, and when the 2nd incident occurred LE said they were not linking the two. I shared the article with the quote earlier in this thread.
I grew up there also, and fair enough if you think it was easier, I never said it was not however, I simply stated how people in the past have vanished without a trace and used that excample due to multiple women. Suspects came much later , not at the time the women vanished. I could use excamples in recent years just as easily. Because the point is not vanished in an era with or without modern technology, but that people do vanish without trace. Ofcourse when new Information is discovered, whether it be the person or items found, incriminating evidence, or a suspect brought to LE attention.... the case can potentially be solved and if not a POI identified.
