Deceased/Not Found UK - Leah Louise Ware (still missing) and Alexandra Morgan, May/Nov 2021 *Guilty*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I just can’t work out what his motive was? I can’t even think of a reason why he would have wanted to murder alexandra? She was just an escort he had been meeting casually. it’s not like the situation with Leah where his long term girlfriend had found out about her, and where Leah was on his case wanting him to leave lisa and his kids for her, she was living on his farm etc. it was very full on and intense with her.
From all I can tell, it was very casual with Alex and was nothing more than a hook up. It makes no sense.
(not justifying Leah’s murder at all by the way, I’m just trying to resonate why he might have decided to kill her, but can’t think why he would murder alex at all..
 
11:08

'Is that dumbing it down enough for you?'​

Mr Atkinson KC says that, in November, a number of bottles of Leah Ware’s medication were discovered in the barrel. Brown says he would always burn any extra medication so that Leah did not take too much.
Asked why he collected medication if the previous week’s had not been collected, Brown says he would not check to see if it had been collected and asks Mr Atkinson to “dumb it down a bit” so he can understand where he is coming from.
“You were collecting the medication to make it seem that Leah was alive even when you knew she was dead, is that dumbing it down enough for you?," Mr Atkinson says.


10 points for the prosecution KC! BURN.
 
11:08

'Is that dumbing it down enough for you?'​

Mr Atkinson KC says that, in November, a number of bottles of Leah Ware’s medication were discovered in the barrel. Brown says he would always burn any extra medication so that Leah did not take too much.
Asked why he collected medication if the previous week’s had not been collected, Brown says he would not check to see if it had been collected and asks Mr Atkinson to “dumb it down a bit” so he can understand where he is coming from.
“You were collecting the medication to make it seem that Leah was alive even when you knew she was dead, is that dumbing it down enough for you?," Mr Atkinson says.


Barristers, especially criminal barristers complain about how their income has fallen in recent years, but what price could you put on delivering the line: “You were collecting the medication to make it seem that Leah was alive even when you knew she was dead, is that dumbing it down enough for you?," Mr Atkinson says?
 
MB reads like a pathological liar (I've experienced this). The type where he's replaced a memory with a more convenient alternative reality, and then gets caught up in his lies, then digs down on them. I've been through this a number of times and it is harrowing - pathological liars will lie to your face even if you tell them you have evidence to the contrary. It's remarkable.

As to motive... IF he is guilty, perhaps something along the lines of AM finding out about LW's supposed death (just weeks before she herself died at his "farm"). I've suspected this all along; AM is woman number two after LW. LW died/disappeared in - at the least - mysterious circumstances. AM was at the scene of where LW lived/disappeared, it is possible she saw or learned something too dangerous.

Alternatively, perhaps MB really is unlucky and LW committed suicide on his property, after which he disposed of her remains himself. And then - being single and randy again - got a new escort in, and then either an accident or murder took place on the same property, after which MB disposes of the remains.

MB is - IMO - a toxic mix of stupid, arrogant, narcissistic, a bit psychopathic, dangerous and unlucky. This could be because of a personality disorder in the so-called "dark triad" (I've seen this professionally many many times), where there are momentary flashes of psychopathy, black and whiting of people, bit of narcissism, grandiosity, often sloppiness when carrying out crimes, and a sometimes deep-set impossibility to defer to authority, even when it might benefit you.

 
Barristers, especially criminal barristers complain about how their income has fallen in recent years, but what price could you put on delivering the line: “You were collecting the medication to make it seem that Leah was alive even when you knew she was dead, is that dumbing it down enough for you?," Mr Atkinson says?
That plus the "your last bit on the side went up in smoke." I mean ... priceless. Painful but priceless. This guy will be on the bench very soon, IMO.
 
Not sure if this has been posted but here it is. It is perhaps worth pointing out that the judge in this case has warned the public gallery that if there are any comments audible to the court he will clear the public gallery for the rest of the trial. When he said this nobody said a word. However I have been to trials when all hell has kicked off in the public gallery and the judge has not cleared the gallery? Was this an empty threat as the public have a right to see justice done in the courts and if there is a problem remove that person, do not make it a closed court.

Murder-accused Mark Brown drained thousands of pounds from the bank account of his alleged victim Leah Ware, his trial heard today (November 16). In the days following Leah’s alleged murder, Brown made multiple withdrawals from her account, amounting to £1,400 per week, with some of this money being put into his own account - Brown insists this money was left for Leah in her horsebox or returned if he had borrowed it.

Leah Ware, a single mum of three, met the defendant, of Squirrel Close, in 2018 and they later began a relationship before she disappeared in May 2021. Brown, 41, is on trial for the alleged murders of Leah as well as that of Alexandra Morgan, a single mum of two, in November 2021. Updates from today's proceedings can be read here.

Mr Atkinson KC continued with his cross-examination of the defendant and made reference to Leah’s finances before and after her disappearance. After making a withdrawal on May 16, 2021, Brown did not withdraw from his account for more than a month, instead making withdrawals of £200 per day from Leah's account on more than 10 occasions - her account was topped up regularly with DWP payments.



After two instances where Brown took £200 from Leah's account and placed it almost immediately into his own account, Mr Atkinson said: "The reality, Mr Brown, is that the withdrawals of cash from Leah's account had nothing to do with her and everything to do with you," - claims that Brown denied.

Alongside the financial transactions, Mr Atkinson also told the court of Brown's use of an escort website shortly after Leah's disappearance. In a message to one user on the site, Brown expressed an interest in a organising a regular meet up, with Mr Atkinson KC stating: “That wasn’t because your last regular thing went up in smoke in a barrel?" Brown again denied any suggestion that he had killed Leah.


Mr Atkinson, who made reference to Brown's purchases of petrol and diesel, followed this previous question when saying: “It took a number of days to burn the body of Alexandra Morgan. Did it also take Leah’s body a number of days to burn?” Brown responded with: “I wouldn’t know, I didn’t burn Leah’s body,” before adding that he had a number of petrol and diesel vehicles that the fuel could be used for.

After Brown had previously mentioned a situation in April 2021 in which Leah had "swiped" a bag of drugs on their way home from Ashford, Mr Atkinson suggested that Brown was simply “making things up as you go along.” Despite Brown stating he was worried about “blowback,” Mr Atkinson pointed out that the defendant never brought this up in conversation with Leah after initially seeing it. Brown denied he had made anything up and said he simply had a lot going on at the time.

The jury were also told about bottles of Leah's medication that were found by police in an oil drum that Brown had used as an incinerator. Brown had already told the jury that he had continued to collect Leah's medication and left it in the horsebox on Little Bridge Farm - burning it if he returned to find the previous week's medication had not been collected.
 
MB reads like a pathological liar (I've experienced this). The type where he's replaced a memory with a more convenient alternative reality, and then gets caught up in his lies, then digs down on them. I've been through this a number of times and it is harrowing - pathological liars will lie to your face even if you tell them you have evidence to the contrary. It's remarkable.

As to motive... IF he is guilty, perhaps something along the lines of AM finding out about LW's supposed death (just weeks before she herself died at his "farm"). I've suspected this all along; AM is woman number two after LW. LW died/disappeared in - at the least - mysterious circumstances. AM was at the scene of where LW lived/disappeared, it is possible she saw or learned something too dangerous.

Alternatively, perhaps MB really is unlucky and LW committed suicide on his property, after which he disposed of her remains himself. And then - being single and randy again - got a new escort in, and then either an accident or murder took place on the same property, after which MB disposes of the remains.

MB is - IMO - a toxic mix of stupid, arrogant, narcissistic, a bit psychopathic, dangerous and unlucky. This could be because of a personality disorder in the so-called "dark triad" (I've seen this professionally many many times), where there are momentary flashes of psychopathy, black and whiting of people, bit of narcissism, grandiosity, often sloppiness when carrying out crimes, and a sometimes deep-set impossibility to defer to authority, even when it might benefit you.

Why would he feel the need to concoct such a ridiculous scheme where Alex would receive £100,000 though unless he was planning something in advance? He mentioned this £100,000 in his texts to Alex in October, weeks before he allegedly murdered her. It appears to me that he likely wanted her to be away for a number of days so that nobody would question her absence during those days. That way he could kill her and have time to dispose of her body over a number of days before anyone reported her missing. I think there's a strong possibility he was planning to kill her weeks beforehand.
 
I just can’t work out what his motive was? I can’t even think of a reason why he would have wanted to murder alexandra? She was just an escort he had been meeting casually. it’s not like the situation with Leah where his long term girlfriend had found out about her, and where Leah was on his case wanting him to leave lisa and his kids for her, she was living on his farm etc. it was very full on and intense with her.
From all I can tell, it was very casual with Alex and was nothing more than a hook up. It makes no sense.
(not justifying Leah’s murder at all by the way, I’m just trying to resonate why he might have decided to kill her, but can’t think why he would murder alex at all..
My thoughts also. I do think the story he concocted about the £100,000 was simply a way of creating an absence that wouldn't be seen as suspicious and perhaps part of the bigger plan to murder her. This way he was giving himself time to kill her and dispose of her body.
 
Barristers, especially criminal barristers complain about how their income has fallen in recent years, but what price could you put on delivering the line: “You were collecting the medication to make it seem that Leah was alive even when you knew she was dead, is that dumbing it down enough for you?," Mr Atkinson says?
Quality
 
Why would he feel the need to concoct such a ridiculous scheme where Alex would receive £100,000 though unless he was planning something in advance? He mentioned this £100,000 in his texts to Alex in October, weeks before he allegedly murdered her. It appears to me that he likely wanted her to be away for a number of days so that nobody would question her absence during those days. That way he could kill her and have time to dispose of her body over a number of days before anyone reported her missing. I think there's a strong possibility he was planning to kill her weeks beforehand.

But what was the motive? And this his second in 6 months. Was he even planning more with the new onlines he was looking at?
 
But what was the motive? And this his second in 6 months. Was he even planning more with the new onlines he was looking at?
Well he'd been searching 'rape' and 'beatings' etc.. so it may just come down to the fact that he enjoyed the feelings of power and control and couldn't resist acting on them. Whether he felt he had to kill Alex because he raped her and knew she would report it or whether it was all just part of his plan, I just don't know.
 
AM was allegedly killed on November 14 and MB arrested on November 23 - a relatively short period of time.

I don't know if there is anyone here who was following the case right from the first days when the police appeals hit the press and social media? I was obviously as I started the first missing thread for AM.

I just wonder if anybody remembers this. I can't swear blind 100% it was MB, but pretty certain, but maybe I stand to be corrected.

On one of the first police appeals on Facebook, a male commented and tagged another male with words to the effect of "Is this your Alex? Must be worrying". The tagged male responded with a few words like "Yeah. Don't know what to do."

I looked at the tagged male's page, and remember a dark haired, quite ordinary looking guy. A child or two also in pix. I wondered if it was ex-husband or bf, as definitely different surname to her. I can't recall name, but know it was short, not like say 'Raymond Higginbottom', but like 'Dan Smith' or 'Mike Jones'.

The post was deleted after maybe a few days or even less. Then a bit later I remember a woman posting saying about stop all the harassment as there was a child who could see the comments. Looking back I do think maybe the original tagged male on the comment was MB. Never took screenshots as seemed inconsequential at time, and could never find the page to the tagged male again so maybe deleted.
 
Remember in the original thread, there were mentions by AM on her FB that she was being stalked.

Yes, I remember that.

But I was referring to what he is saying, that allegedly there was another unidentified woman he was helping who he called 'Alex' but wasn't AM, despite showing others AM's photo as being this second 'Alex'.

Surely police asked where they could contact this mystery woman with the 'Alex' alias. I doubt 100% she exists or existed. Just another bizarre story cooked up to try and worm his way out.
 
11:09

Good morning and welcome back​

Good morning and welcome back. Apologies for our slightly late start with our live updates.

11:16

Cross-examination continues​

Mark Brown arrives in court wearing a dark blue suit jacket and tie, a white shirt, a pair of light blue jeans and a pair of black trainers. His hair is slicked back and he has some light facial hair.
Mr Atkinson KC stands to resume asking questions to the defendant. More questions will be asked in relation to the timeline of events.



 
Last edited:
11:17

November 14, 2021​

Alex Morgan arrived at Little Bridge Farm at 7.58am, 30 minutes earlier than expected, resulting in her arriving at the same time as Brown. The jury is again shown the video of Brown and Miss Morgan arriving at the farm, with Brown getting out his car to open the gate.
Brown says it takes around 30 seconds to a minute to drive up the track and confirms they had a chat whilst he opened the barn, they go inside and move over to the truck where he has a kettle. Brown says this took around another minute to a minute and a half.
“We had a cup of coffee and a cigarette, and stood by the recovery truck talking,” he then adds.
Brown confirms Alex does not go straight to the shipping container, where their transaction was set to take place.
Mr Atkinson confirms that Alex’s phone last spoke to the network immediately before she drove up the lane with Brown and did not tell the network that it had been switched off. He questions whether Alex had in fact gone straight to the shipping container with the door closed behind her. Brown denies this and insists they first had a cup of coffee and a chat.
Brown says some of the chat they had was about the webcam work she was interested in getting into, whilst other parts were just “general chit-chat”. The defendant says the man he had arranged to chat with Alex regarding webcam work would be free from 9.30am or 10am.

11:19

November 14 continued​

The defendant has previously said he went to the shipping container to turn on the heating whilst Alex retrieved cigarettes from Brown’s car.
“Why didn’t you get them yourself?” Mr Atkinson questions.
“I wish I had done, she said she’d go and get them for me,” Brown replies.
Asked why she knew where they were, Brown says she had been in his car before and that he may even have told her they were on the passenger seat.
Mr Atkinson suggests that, as they had only just had a cigarette, Alex would have been in no rush to get another cigarette so would have been walking at a “normal walking pace”, which Brown says could be the case. The defendant says she fell backwards after slipping on a socket, but as he did not see it all, he can’t be certain.
Mr Atkinson says that Brown is suggesting she tripped on an area of the workshop he had, only minutes before, told the jury was almost always clear. Brown says it was cluttered on this occasion after he had to move his Range Rover.

 
11:21

'I've never experienced panic like that before ever in my life'​

Brown says there was so much blood that he could not tell what her head had hit, but he believed it could have been an angle iron.
“It is clear, before you do anything else, that she is hurt and needs help. She needs a doctor doesn’t she, that is absolutely obvious,” Mr Atkinson states, and questions his decision not to call an ambulance.
“I've never experienced panic like that before ever in my life,” Brown replies.
“Why Mr Brown, did you not call an ambulance?” Mr Atkinson asks.
“Because my priority was to stop the bleeding and try and find a pulse,” Brown responds.
“I panicked alright, I’ve never panicked like that before, there was a lot of blood.”
“Was it at that point that you decided to cover it up?," Mr Atkinson asks.
“No, that was when I went to go and get my phone,” Brown replies, adding that he had originally intended to call an ambulance at that point - he says Alex was dead at this point and that he threw up.
“It is only when you were satisfied that she was dead that you decided to call an ambulance?” Mr Atkinson says.
“I wouldn’t use the word satisfied but yes.”
Asked why he decided to try and stop the blood from going under the door, Brown again says he was panicking so threw a hoodie on it.
Mr Atkinson asks: “In common sense terms, the only reason to stop the blood from going under the door was to stop it from being visible from outside, wasn’t it?"
Brown says the blood resembled that seen in a cowboy film and that it was vivid, before adding: “I was panicked, I wasn’t thinking straight.”

 
11:24 KEY EVENT

'The worst f.u.c.k.i.n.g mistake I’ve ever made in my life'​

Asked why he chose to cover it up, Brown replies: “Because I had a dead escort on my workshop floor. What did it look like? It looked like a murder scene, there was blood everywhere.
“It was a stupid thing to do, the worst f.u.c.k.i.n.g mistake I’ve ever made in my life.”
Adding: “My life was over wasn’t it, whatever happened I was screwed.”
Asked if he covered it up out of fear of losing his sons had he been caught, Brown denies this and says he was worried about going to prison for a long time, at which time he would not see his sons.
Brown insists that the police would not have believed him and that he would be in the same situation as he is in now.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
1,661
Total visitors
1,826

Forum statistics

Threads
600,081
Messages
18,103,544
Members
230,986
Latest member
eluluwho
Back
Top