Ive read them. Many people on this forum are living this though...and the stuff posted online (social media) is also stuff they're experiencing in conversations with living people. It isn't clear when the two cross over.[/QUOTE
The police never said it was pr on the Haworth st. CCTV so we have to assume that wasn't him.
If it wasn't him then the police either suspect pr picked up Libby.
Or
They have seen him pick her up on different CCTV.
They seem sure that something happened in the park. And because they arrested PR they must think he was somehow involved.
So they must have tracked PRs phone and seen he was at the park until 3.30 or whenever it was.
But they can't have seen him at or by the park with Libby on CCTV because their only last sighting of Libby was by the bench opposite Beresford.
So . . If it turns out that PR has nothing to do with it does that mean that the police have absolutely no idea what happened?
Because they don't seem to have found anything at the park. And now it seems a bit desperate asking for potential witnesses weeks after the night. It's like they're desperate for any clues that something might have happened at the park.
It is interesting that they have now narrowed the time frame from earlier in the investigation...it used to be 12:09 - 3:00 (when they were asking if anyone had seen/heard anything). Clearly, something has caused them to do this. Possibly pings from PR's phone? Although, I am not sure if a ping allows them to be as specific as the park. All of Libby's locations (and the park) are very close together...would they be able to pinpoint the location as the park as opposed to a few blocks away?