I'm still kind of baffled by this case, my brain won't settle on it until I hear the evidence. It's strange when some cases you just "get a feeling" whether someones innocent or not and I'm having a hard time believing that her cousin and her husband are guilty.. just waiting for those tidbits to come through (sorry if I've missed something) is there a media thread for this case?
Evening Lots happened today , didn't expect the arrests !!No I believe the carparks have been open throughout lockdown, but I’m only going on what I remember on Wednesday last week when I drove past! I’m sure you can enter on foot in quite a few places via Leigh Park Gardens but it’s been a while since I’ve been up there, a friend hung himself up there a few years back and the place just creeps me out! @magicslipper do you know how many entrances there are on foot and road?!
I have not heard anything or seen anything about a boyfriend at all not even a name .Is there any more info on Louise's boyfriend who was suppose to be coming to stay with her at her mum's?
Earlier on in the thread someone mentioned an online boyfriend, could it be possible this boyfriend is the red van driver?
Maybe CJ wouldn't let him visit at the flat?
Maybe he is alot older than Louise if he is an online "boyfriend"?
I have not heard anything or seen anything about a boyfriend at all not even a name .
I would have thought if there was one he would be doing appeals, in fact come to think of it, nobody did an appeal at all
I never even thought about it until the boyfriend was mentioned , did he really exist?That's actually a very good point! Wonder why that was?
No surprise whatsoever.
Once again a couple of idiots think they can pull off the ‘report them missing, worried friend’ act and must genuinely believe they can out think and out manoeuvre intelligent trained officers.
Groundhog Day.
Rest easy Louise, and some justice at the absolute least for RJC we hope
I do find it very odd noone can say what she was wearing on the 8th. Did she text anyone (friends/family) on the 8th? There would be proof on their phones. Although I guess someone else could be texting pretending to be her. No personal public press appeals televised to find a missing relative (apart from on FB). Strong denial on FB that the body found 2 weeks later saying there's NO EVIDENCE that it could be poor Louise. Which is factually true but the emphasis on no evidence, implying no proof/prosecution at a future date. If Louise's body was burnt then the person/s motive in doing so WOULD be to make ID impossible and destroy evidence. All these things (and more) points to some sort of coverup by some of the family. I guess that's why the police's two arrests for kidnap then murder are prefixed by 'on suspicion of' ? Thoughts please