UK - Lucy Letby Trial - Media, Maps & Timeline *NO DISCUSSION*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Episode 57, Toxic Culture​




In this episode Caroline and Liz speak to Dr John Gibbs, one of the consultants who repeatedly tried to blow the whistle on Lucy Letby. He speaks of his regret that hospital managers didn’t listen or go to police sooner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IDK
 
CHILD serial killer Lucy Letby has formally lodged a bid to challenge her conviction at the Court of Appeal, officials have confirmed.

Court staff said on Friday, September 15, that they had received an application for permission to appeal.

 
The Mail podcast from 10th July 2023, which I've now transcribed. It contains material about defence expert witnesses not included in any other media articles, in the judge's summing up before the jury retired to deliberate.


Episode 45, The jury retires​


In this episode Caroline and Liz explain that the jury has now been sent out to consider their verdicts. They were asked to begin their deliberations after listening to the judge sum up the case for more than four days.


Transcript

"The prosecution and defence have finished outlining their cases and the jury have now been asked to decide whether Lucy Letby is guilty or not guilty of the 22 charges that she faces. I’m Liz Hull, northern correspondent for the Mail. I will be in court to report on the case as it develops. And I’m Caroline Cheetham, a broadcast journalist. Every week we’ll examine what’s happened and bring you the details behind the headlines. This is The Trial of Lucy Letby.

LH: So all the evidence in the case has now been heard by the jury. The prosecution and the defence have outlined their cases and we’re now approaching the end of this trial. [explanation given re. anonymity of babies] In this episode we’ll hear the judge, Mr Justice Goss, send the jury out to begin their deliberations.

CC: We’ll bring you his summing up of all the evidence they’ve heard over the past 145 days.

LH: We’ll outline his reminder that although experts were instructed for both the prosecution and the defence, only the prosecution called their experts to give evidence.

CC: And we’ll explain that he urged the jury to make their decisions on the facts and to try to disregard the emotion and personal loss involved in the case.

LH: Welcome to episode 45, The jury retires.

CC: So we’ve reached a really important stage in the case Liz, because today, in fact just a few hours ago, the jury was finally sent out to deliberate on their verdicts, over nine months after they were sworn in.

LH: Yes last week the eight women and four men of the jury listened intently as the judge, Mr Justice Goss, summarised all the evidence they’ve heard from the prosecution and the defence, since this all began last October.

CC: We said a couple of weeks ago but it’s worth mentioning again, this trial has now been sitting through every season and today was the day that everyone’s been working towards for so long. The day the judge sent the jury out to consider the fundamental issue in the case, whether Lucy Letby, a neonatal nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital, is guilty or innocent of murdering and attempting to murder babies in her care.

LH: And now all everyone else, that’s the barristers and lawyers, police officers, us and all the other journalists, the mums and dads of the babies and Lucy Letby herself, can do is wait. Wait until they reach a decision on each of the 22 charges she faces.

CC: So let’s go back to what the judge, Mr Justice Goss, told the jury before he sent them out. Now he explained that he was going to remind them of what they’d heard from all of the witnesses who came to court to give evidence over the past nine months.

LH: While the prosecution speech from Nick Johnson KC a couple of weeks ago explained why they say Lucy Letby is guilty and Ben Myers KC’s speech examined the opposite, that’s why he says she’s innocent, the summary from the judge is designed to provide them with a more balanced narrative, based on the evidence they’ve heard of what happened on the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital.

CC: So Mr Justice Goss went back to the beginning by giving them a bit of background and context to the case. He explained that it had all been prompted by a significant rise in the numbers of babies suffering serious and unexpected collapses in the hospital’s neonatal unit in 2015 and 2016.

Judge: The prosecution case is that those collapses were not natural events, but were caused by the defendant Lucy Letby using various means to harm babies, intending they should die. Some died, others were resuscitated or in the case of alleged poisoning by insulin, the source was removed. A number of babies were subjected, the prosecution say, to repeated attempts to kill them. After a year it became clear that, of all the nursing staff and doctors, the defendant and her alone was at work in the unit at relevant times and was sometimes present when unexpected collapses occurred.

LH: The judge said his summing up would not be exhaustive and told the jury it was up to them to decide which were the most relevant and important pieces of evidence when they made their decisions.

CC: And he began by reminding them of some of the detail relating to the neonatal unit and what was going on there at the time they’re concerned with. He said back then the unit was a level 2 centre capable of taking babies born after 27 weeks.

Judge: up to 2015 the number of deaths on the unit was within the expected number of a unit of its type in the region, which was less than the national average. In 2015 and 2016 the numbers of deaths increased significantly with a marked difference both in the number of deaths and the unusual and unexpected nature of the deaths. The defence contend that this was a consequence of the increased number of neonatal babies being admitted at that time and the higher acuity of those babies. As the number of cases increased the consultants began to “think the unthinkable” as it was described – that these were not naturally occurring sudden collapses but the consequence of deliberate harmful acts.

LH: The judge reminded the jury that Lucy Letby was asked about her relationship with other members of staff who worked on the unit. She confirmed that apart from one of the female consultants who we can’t name for legal reasons but we’ve been calling doctor B, who she didn’t have the best working relationship with, she’d had no problem with any of the doctors and had a normal working relationship with them all.

Judge: ...she loved doctor A as a friend, but was not ‘in love’ with him. Later she characterised Dr Stephen Brearey as a *advertiser censored*. After investigations began she said he was one of four consultants, the others being Dr Ravi Jayaram, Dr Gibbs and Dr B, who conspired together to apportion blame on her, she believed to cover the failings of the hospital.

LH: There were seven consultants who worked on the neonatal unit and the children’s ward next door, the judge said. Nurses on the unit were qualified in three different bands. Band 6 were the highest qualified followed by band 5 nurses who were split between those who were qualified to care for intensive care babies and those who were not, and band 4 nurses commonly known as nursery nurses who mainly looked after the special care babies.

CC: he reminded the jury that several nurses had given evidence that the unit was sometimes short-staffed and on occasion they weren’t able to provide one-to-one care to intensive care babies which was in breach of recognised guidelines.

LH: But, the judge said, doctors had refuted any suggestion that staffing levels had compromised the care of any child. And a review carried out by the RCPCH had subsequently found staffing levels were better at the Countess than in all other district hospitals in the Cheshire Mersey area.

Judge: these units did not have the same mortality problems as the Countess of Chester.

LH: he told the jury it was up to them to decide the relevance of the staffing issues.

Judge: there is evidence of occasions when, contrary to standards, a nurse on shift was the designated nurse for more than one intensive care baby. There was also occasions when the nursing staff complained about the shift and when care was not as good as it should have been. Of potential relevance is whether any specific or identified failings by any of the clinicians and nursing practitioners was or may have been relevant to any deterioration of babies or any event you are considering. In particular whether a failure of care or mistake was causative to a sudden deterioration of any baby in the case or adversely affected their chances of recovery.

CC: the judge then summarised the prosecution and defence’s position on the two babies, baby F and baby L, who were poisoned with insulin.

Judge: in the case of two babies there is evidence of unprescribed insulin having been administered when it was wholly inappropriate. They are baby F and baby L each of whom was a twin. In their cases the prosecution invite you to conclude that there can be no doubt that someone intentionally added insulin to nutritional feed and dextrose, that being given to baby F and baby L respectively. And the chances of there being more than one person acting in that way can be entirely discounted. Medical negligence or accident cannot have played any part in these cases, they submit. The defence invite you to question the evidence of the taking of blood samples, and the potential consequences of insulin poisoning and the lack of harm caused. The prosecution say this evidence is of major significance being incontrovertible evidence that someone was deliberately and knowingly doing something completely contrary to normal practice. They say it was very dangerous and must have been done with the intent of endangering the lives of the children. They say this assists and informs you in the cases of the other children who suffered sudden and unexplained collapses from which there was no apparent medical explanation.

LH: the judge said it was the defence case that Lucy Letby was a dedicated, caring and conscientious nurse who never did anything to harm any child.

Judge: …babies do collapse for no apparent reason and there are potential medical reasons for at least some of the collapses. If there was someone intent on harming children it was not her.

CC: he explained that Lucy Letby had no previous convictions and had never been in trouble with the police before her arrest in July 2018.

LH: he explained she’d always wanted to work with children and selected her A levels so she could study for a degree in nursing. She undertook two work placements at the Countess in 2010 and 2011 while at Chester University, and started work as a band 5 nurse at the Countess in January 2012. Initially she started working with special care babies in nurseries 3 and 4 the judge said but she always strived to go on every course, and in March or April 2015 she completed a six-month course which involved a placement at the Liverpool Women’s hospital that allowed her to care for the sickest babies on the unit.

Judge: the defendant said that over a 12-month period she cared for hundreds of babies and she never did anything that was meant to hurt any of them. She only ever did her best to care for them. Hurting a baby was completely against everything being a nurse is. She was there to help and to care, not to harm.

LH: the judge reminded the jury that they’d heard from seven expert witnesses for the prosecution including the two paediatricians Dr Dewi Evans and Dr Sandie Bohin.

CC: he also said that although medical experts had been instructed by the defence only experts for the prosecution had given evidence.

Judge: although you know that experts were instructed on behalf of the defence and there were meetings between experts the only witnesses from whom you have heard were called by the prosecution. As with any witness it is for you to decide whether you accept some or all of the evidence of an expert witness. It is your view as to the significance and reliability of this evidence that is important.

LH: the judge also urged the jury to make their decisions on the facts and to try to disregard emotion and the personal trauma and loss involved in the case.

CC: he then focused his attention on each of the babies and the charges relating to them in the case, recapping what each witness has said when they were called to give evidence about them.

LH: we’ve heard much of this evidence over the course of our previous 44 episodes so we aren’t going to repeat it here again. But explaining what happened to each child took Mr Justice Goss the best part of four days.

LH: finally at two minutes past one, the two jury bailiffs who look after the jury while they are deliberating were officially sworn in and the judge sent the eight women and four men out into their retirement room to begin their deliberations.

Judge: how you conduct your deliberations is entirely a matter for you. You should of course respect each other’s opinions and value different viewpoints. Everyone should have a chance to speak. You should listen to one another and no one should feel pressure. You are under no pressure of time. Do not make your own enquiries about the case or talk or communicate with anyone in any way except when you are all together as a group of twelve. When you reach your verdicts your foreman should inform the jury bailiff and you will be called back in to court. The clerk of the court will ask the foreman to stand and they will be asked on each count whether you have reached a verdict and then whether you find the defendant guilty or not guilty. That completes my directions and I ask you now to retire and commence your deliberations."
 
[...]

The 33-year-old – who was last month sentenced to a whole life order for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others – is expected to start her bid to clear her name at a court hearing later this month.

But any full consideration of her appeal is unlikely to take place for several months. [...]

One father, whose baby Letby tried to murder, told the Mail: 'I'm disgusted and angry that Letby is appealing.

'As if we haven't been through enough. We are trying to rebuild our lives and now this, it's a joke of a system. I don't understand on what grounds she can appeal - there were no mitigating factors in the trial.'

[...]

Anyone convicted of a crime has 28 days to ask for permission to appeal – the 28-day period from the last verdicts in Letby's trial would have elapsed today.

A judge will now look at Letby's application and decide whether to give permission for it to go to appeal.

Should permission be given, the appeal would be heard by three senior judges.

If her application for permission to appeal is rejected, Letby can still renew her application before a panel of two or three judges.

[...]

The Judicial Office said it had received an application from her legal team.

'I can confirm that an application for leave to appeal against conviction has been received in the case of Lucy Letby,' a spokesman said.

Letby's solicitor, Richard Thomas, declined to comment today.

[...]

The Criminal Appeal Office said it could not give any information about the grounds for appeal. No court hearing has yet been formally listed, the Judicial Office said.

[...]


 
1695368246362.png1695368258111.png

[...] The woman fears her daughter - who was born prematurely in September 2014 - may have been left brain damaged by Letby, and is calling for police to investigate. [...]

The mum revealed that a day after Letby left the note, her baby girl ended up at the centre of a medical drama. Initially, her daughter had been making positive progress on the neonatal unit, and was moved to a nursery ward where she continued gaining strength. Having reached 5lbs, her parents were preparing for her to be discharged when they arrived one morning - shortly after Letby had been on shift - to find alarms ringing and their daughter's health rapidly deteriorating. [...]

The mum said: "I screamed for them to open up the incubator to get an oxygen mask on her. She had to have a lumbar puncture, then was put back in intensive care. No infection was found." Around the time she was born, the woman's daughter had a brain scan and the results were clear, she said. However, eight months later in May 2015, she visited a consultant after realising her daughter was struggling to sit upright. An MRI scan confirmed that she had brain damage with cerebral palsy. [...]

"In the picture, the plaster should be taped to her nose to keep it on, but it isn't. It's not a nice photo, and I don't know why anyone would take a picture of it.

The mum later got in contact with police to voice her concerns over Letby taking care of her daughter, and the lack of an explanation for her condition. She said: "Their first response was that it wasn't in the timeframe they were looking at. When they widened the dates slightly I emailed again, but they said 'it's not part of our investigation and we suggest you speak to her consultant'. [...]

 

Episode 63, The expert witness​



Partial transcript:


Dr Dewi Evans
: “so having completed my reports on the 32 cases by November 2017 I sent them all off to Cheshire Police, highlighting the ones I thought were concerning and telling them ‘cross-reference who was on duty for these babies’. And of course for the 15 there was one nurse on duty for all of these cases.

Liz Hull: and we’re talking about 15 we should probably just say because the other two are the insulin cases, which make up to the 17 babies involved in the trial.

DE: Yes. So what I then said to the police that they shouldn’t rely on my opinion alone. You need to get someone else. So they sent my reports to a consultant neonatologist in Newcastle upon Tyne, Dr Martin Ward Platt. His view was exactly the same as mine. But sadly he became seriously ill and died, and this is why he was not part of the prosecution team. So that led to the police finding Dr Sandie Bohin who had been a neonatologist in Leicester before moving to Guernsey. Her role was to scrutinise my reports, peer review my reports. So she came to the same conclusions as I did, some of these babies were victims of inflicted direct harm, direct trauma, some were victims of air into the circulation, and some had milk or milk and air injected into their stomachs. And of course several of these babies had sustained multiple assaults and several of them were the victims of having air into the stomach and air into the bloodstream.

LH: there’s been a lot of questions about why Ben Myers didn’t call a medical expert for Lucy Letby. We know from court that he, they did employ a medical expert to review your reports and to review the cases. So can you tell us why you think he didn’t call him, or why, you know, it’s intriguing.

DE: For the past 10 years I’ve probably prepared as many reports for the defence in criminal cases as I have for the police, for the prosecution. And the rules in relation to the defence are totally different. The defence is under no obligation to disclose anything. Now what they are obliged to do is to get an independent opinion if the prosecution says that the defendant has harmed an individual and that the evidence is based on medical expertise. So therefore they need to get their own expert, or experts. And this is what they did. But once I saw the reports from the two paediatricians, this is in June, I told the prosecution team and Cheshire Police they are not going to call their expert witnesses.

LH: So in your opinion did you feel like those reports were prepared to counter your reports rather than to explain what had happened to the babies?

DE: That is correct.

LH: and we know, don’t we, that their expert sat in the court next door, and that’s perfectly legal, you sat there and listened to the evidence as it came out from the medics at the Countess, and he did the same, and listened to your evidence as well…

DE: Yes.

LH: …so, they were fully in the picture, and they could have been called but Mr Myers for whatever reason decided that he wouldn’t call his expert."
 
Last edited:

9:46am

The court hearing is expected to begin at 10.30am.
We will provide updates from the courtroom at Manchester Crown Court.

10:14am

Dozens of members of the media have now entered court 4 at Manchester Crown Court, one of the larger courtrooms in the building, in advance of the hearing.

10:22am

Nicholas Johnson KC, the prosecutor in the Lucy Letby trial, and Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence, have arrived in the courtroom, along with their respective legal teams.

10:26am

Lucy Letby is appearing via videolink from HMP Newhall.

10:28am

The judge has entered the courtroom, and Letby has confirmed she can hear proceedings.

10:32am

The prosecution say they are seeking a retrial in the case of the attempted murder of Child K, and not the remaining counts.

10:33am

Such a retrial would last about two weeks, the prosecution and judge agree on, but the judge adds that juries can deliberate for some time. He says a retrial would therefore last up to three weeks.

10:35am

The judge says it would be "inappropriate" for that retrial to take place until the application of appeal was processed.

10:35am

Such a retrial would take place from October 7, 2024, the judge adds, saying that is "the first available date".

10:40am

Mr Myers rises to say Letby maintains her innocence on the unresolved matters.
He outlines the difficulties on what could be presented to the jury in a retrial.
He says '2-3 weeks' is a "reasonable estimate" for the length of that trial, and says next October presents some difficulties for the defence team, owing to a long-running case scheduled for around that time.

10:43am

The judge says he is prepared not to fix a date for a retrial, but to say the trial would 'not take place before' a specific date.
A date next June is now offered by the court clerk, and the retrial is provisionally fixed for June 10, 2024, as that availability appears more suited to the prosecution and defence.
Mr Justice James Goss says he is unable to confirm whether he would be the judge for that retrial.

10:44am

The judge confirms the retrial would take place in Manchester, as it would not be possible "to accommodate anywhere else which would be appropriate".

10:51am

The judge says a jury will be directed, in the retrial, to judge the case solely on the evidence that is presented before them.

11:28am

The court has resumed following an adjournment.

11:30am

The judge confirms what can be reported to the media, in that the prosecution intends to seek a retrial on the attempted murder case of Child K, listed for June 10, 2024, expected to last between two and three weeks.

11:42am

It has been clarified the prosecution is, at this stage, not intending to proceed with a retrial on the remaining five counts.

12:00pm

The Crown Prosecution Service has issued a statement following today's court hearing:
Jonathan Storer, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS Mersey-Cheshire, said: “These decisions on whether to seek retrials on the remaining counts of attempted murder were extremely complex and difficult.
“Before reaching our conclusions we listened carefully to the views of the families affected, police and prosecution counsel.
“Many competing factors were considered including the evidence heard by the court during the long trial and its impact on our legal test for proceeding with a prosecution.
“We have met with all the families affected by these decisions to explain how they were reached.”



12:28KEY EVENT

Solicitor for 7 babies' families 'disappointed' with CPS decision​

Tamlin Bolton, a Senior Associate Solicitor at Switalskis, represents the families of seven babies.
In a statement today, she said: "At Switalskis, we are disappointed with the CPS decision to not proceed with a retrial on all of the cases. We believe that the families of the further alleged victims still have questions that are unanswered, and they deserve to know what happened to their children."
 
The former neonatal nurse, originally from Hereford, attended the hour-long hearing via videolink from a conference room at HMP New Hall in Wakefield, West Yorkshire.
Sat behind a desk, Letby spoke only to confirm her name and that she could see and hear the proceedings.

 

CPS statement on Lucy Letby retrial decisions​

25 September 2023|News

We have sought a retrial on one count of attempted murder against Lucy Letby – there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.

Jonathan Storer, Chief Crown Prosecutor, CPS Mersey-Cheshire, said:
“These decisions on whether to seek retrials on the remaining counts of attempted murder were extremely complex and difficult.
“Before reaching our conclusions we listened carefully to the views of the families affected, police and prosecution counsel.
“Many competing factors were considered including the evidence heard by the court during the long trial and its impact on our legal test for proceeding with a prosecution.
“We have met with all the families affected by these decisions to explain how they were reached.”
ENDS

Notes to editors​

  • Our legal guidance on retrials is available to read here: Retrials | The Crown Prosecution Service (cps.gov.uk)
  • Our legal test for prosecution, the Code for Crown prosecutors, is available to read here: The Code for Crown Prosecutors | The Crown Prosecution Service (cps.gov.uk)
  • In August, Lucy Letby was found guilty of seven counts of murder and seven counts of attempted murder. She was found not guilty of two counts of attempted murder. She was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole-life term.
  • There were a further six counts of attempted murder - relating to five babies - on which the jury was unable to reach verdicts. Today’s decisions relate to these counts.

 
Child serial killer Lucy Letby does not oppose a bid to strike her from the nursing register but maintains her innocence in respect of her convictions, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) has been told. [...]

Mr Scott will ask the panel to strike Letby off. Letby, of Hereford, was told of the hearing but did not attend and was not represented.


The panel decided to proceed in her absence. She faces a retrial next June for one count of attempted murder.

 
"The panel found she was unfit to practise nursing before it went on to make the striking-off order, a move they have heard Letby does not resist, despite maintaining her innocence in respect of her convictions. [...]

Herdan also said she had abused her position of trust as a nurse, had shown no remorse and that there were no mitigating factors.

He imposed an interim suspension order against Letby for 18 months to cover a potential appeal period."

[...]

 
(Over the next few days I'll be adding the media reports of the retrial which took place in June 2024)

Tuesday 11th June 2024

Chester Standard - link Lucy Letby: Jury sworn in for Countess nurse retrial

The jury for the retrial of Lucy Letby has been sworn in at Manchester Crown Court today (Tuesday, June 11).

[...]

The judge added Nicholas Johnson KC would deliver the prosecution opening on Wednesday, June 12, from 11am, followed by a defence statement from Benjamin Myers KC. After the opening, the trial will continue with 12 jurors.


Wednesday 12th June 2024

Chester Standard - link Recap: Prosecution opens case in Lucy Letby retrial

9:28am
This is the beginning of the retrial of Lucy Letby before a jury.
The 34-year-old former Countess of Chester Hospital nurse is accused of attempting to murder a baby girl at the hospital in February 2016.
Trial judge Mr Justice James Goss has told the jury, sworn in on Tuesday afternoon, that they are aware Letby - who denies the charge - has previously been convicted of murdering several babies and attempting to murder others.
He told them to try the case only on the evidence that is heard before them, and not to conduct any independent research or discuss the case with anyone.

9:29am
We will be providing live updates throughout the day as the prosecution is expected to deliver its opening this morning.

9:39am
Proceedings today are expected to begin at the slightly later time of 11am. Jurors have been informed a typical court day will run from 10.30am to 4.15pm, with a lunch break at about 1pm.
They have also been told the case will not be sitting this Friday (June 14).

11:39am
The trial is now resuming.

11:40am
Prosecutor Nicholas Johnson KC is now delivering the opening. He explains who the legal teams are, including Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence.

11:42am
He explains there was a long trial which took place in which Letby was convicted on seven counts of murdering babies and seven counts of attempting to murder six other babies.
He says they happened when Letby was working in the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

11:43am
He says those convictions are relevant as it gives the jury significant evidence to Letby's intention, as to the allegation of what the prosecution say she attempted to do to the baby girl.

11:47am
Documents are now being distributed to the jury.
They include the neonatal unit review schedule, a floorplan of the neonatal unit with where babies were located at the start and the end of a shift. They include the baby girl on room 1 in the neonatal unit at the end of the shift.
Other babies on the unit are anonymised via initials. "Their names aren't relevant to the proceedings," Mr Johnson tells the jury.

11:50am
Also shown is which nurses were designated to each baby for that shift.
Lucy Letby was the designated nurse for two babies in room 2 that shift.
Mr Johnson says the events relating to the baby girl were in nursery room 1, and "that gives rise to certain questions".

11:55am
Mr Johnson shows the Sequence of Events, which he will refer to as 'SoE' and which jurors can access on their iPads, showing a timeline of events which happened around the indictment period.

11:56am
Jurors have already been taught how to use the iPads this morning, which led to the later start.

12:00pm
Mr Johnson shows the indictment which sets out the charge, that Letby attempted to murder the baby girl in February 2016.
Also provided is an agreed glossary of medical-related terms.
There are also 'agreed facts', that is material which is agreed between the prosecution and the defence.
Mr Johnson explains says such material should be treated as facts proved in the case, without the requirement for witnesses to be called to give evidence on such material.

12:02pm
Mr Johnson says a walkthrough video has been provided of the neonatal unit, which will be played to jurors as part of the prosecution opening.
He says this is as the unit looked back in 2016, and no longer exists.

12:05pm
Photographs of the neonatal unit layout are also provided. One is from the end of a nurses' station, with nursery room 1 towards the end of the picture.

12:08pm
Mr Johnson says the remainder of the documents folder is empty, but will be filled with records of police interviews with Lucy Letby.
He tells the jury that what the barristers say to them is "not the evidence", but to suggest what important evidence they should be looking out for, and "what the battle lines are".

12:10pm
A video walkthrough of the neonatal unit is now played to the court.
He explains the video pre-title of 'Operation Hummingbird' is simply the name of the case, and has no relevance to the jury.

12:19pm
The video was filmed in September 2021 and shows a nurse walking through the various rooms of the neonatal unit, including nursery room 1, the 'critical room'.

12:25pm
The video walkthrough goes through the remaining rooms in the neonatal unit. There are a total of four nursery rooms.

12:28pm
The video is made accessible to the jury's iPads, which any juror can access.

12:29pm
Mr Johnson says the date of concern is February 17, 2016.
He says by this stage, Lucy Letby had murdered five babies, and had attempted to murder three more.
She had twice attempted to murder one of the latter.

12:31pm
He says after this date [February 17, 2016], Letby murdered two of three triplets on June 23-24, 2016, and had attempted to murder twins on April 9, 2016, and a boy on June 3, 2016.

12:34pm
Mr Johnson shows, as part of the sequence of events, Facebook searches Letby had made for family members of babies who had died in June 2015.
Mr Johnson says these are not the only Facebook searches Letby had made, as she had searched for parents of other babies who have nothing to do with the case.
He says Letby "undoubtedly" murdered babies, and then searched for their parents. Two of the Facebook searches, for parents of two different babies Letby murdered, are listed a minute apart.

12:37pm
Further Facebook searches are shown, including repeated searches for some parents of murdered babies.

12:38pm
Mr Johnson says those Facebook searches continued until after June 2016.

12:42pm
Mr Johnson now turns to the events in February 2016, when the mother of the baby girl arrived at the Countess of Chester Hospital on the morning of Monday, February 15.
Clinical notes are shown as transcribed versions and in their original handwriting, in the sequence of events.

12:44pm
Mr Johnson tells the jury that the baby girl was "very, very premature", at a gestation of 24 weeks and six days [compared to a 'standard' 40-week pregnancy], but the mother was already in labour.

12:45pm
Mr Johnson explains that the baby girl was to need a transfer to a tertiary centre in the Mersey/Cheshire area, which would be either Liverpool Women's Hospital or Arrowe Park. The Countess of Chester Hospital was not a tertiary centre.

12:50pm
Consultant obstetrician Dr Sarah Brigham, a senior doctor whose speciality is pregnancy and childbirth and the time after that birth, wrote there was a need to transfer the baby girl to a level 3 neonatal unit.
Mr Johnson says normally the Countess would not have dealt with such premature deliveries, but he added that events took over, and the nearest available level 3 unit at the time was Preston. Given the risks involved with transport, Dr Sarah Brigham noted in relation to the potential transfer: 'cancelled patient unstable to transfer'.

12:54pm
Mr Johnson refers to a text message Lucy Letby had sent to colleague at this time, '...24wkr [weeker] wanted nvd [non-vaginal delivery] so was 6cm when we left this morning...'.
Nursing colleague Alisa Simpson replied '...Aw it's a shame that Mum wasn't stable enough to be transferred out...'

12:56pm
On Wednesday, February 17, at 2.12am, the baby girl was born.
Mr Johnson says she did "remarkably well" for such a premature baby.
'Apgar' scores for the baby girl are shown of 4/10 for one minute after birth, 9/10 at five minutes, 9/10 at 10 minutes. A number of factors including colour and response to touch are assessed. Scores of "seven or above" are considered babies in good condition, Mr Johnson says.

12:59pm
At the time of the birth, Mr Johnson says, Letby was with nursing colleague Joanne Williams, having signed and countersigned for medication for a neonatal unit baby in room 2.

1:02pm
The court now adjourns for the lunch break.
The trial judge reassures the jury not to assimilate everything that has been said so far, as it is an introduction.
He urges the jurors not to talk to anyone about the case, including other jurors.
 
Wednesday 12th June 2024 continued

Chester Standard - link Recap: Prosecution opens case in Lucy Letby retrial

2:17pm
The trial is now resuming.
Nicholas Johnson KC continues the prosecution opening.

2:19pm
He explains the baby girl [which for this blog shall henceforth be named Child K] was intubated at 2.32am, prior to the transfer to the neonatal unit at 2.40am. To explain this process, a video is played to the jury.

2:28pm
Mr Johnson says there are a number of times the tube moved for Child K.

2:35pm
Mr Johnson says for that shift, Dr John Gibbs was the paediatrician for that week. Dr Ravi Jayaram is listed as the on-call consultant between 4.30pm and 8.30am.
Nursing staff are shift leader Caroline Oakley, with designated nurse Joanne Williams, and other nurses Lucy Letby and Sophie Ellis, plus nursery nurse Valerie Thomas.
A floorplan shows Letby was the designated nurse for two babies in nursery room 2 at the start of that night shift.
Two babies were being looked after in room 1 by designated nurse Caroline Oakley.
Joanne Williams was designated nurse for a baby in room 2. She was later designated as the nurse for Child K that night.

2:36pm
Between 2.36am and 2.50am, Lucy Letby was making nursing notes for one of the two babies she was designated to look after in room 2.

2:38pm
At 2.45am, Child K was given surfactant down an ET tube, to help with her lungs.

2:43pm
At 3am, IV fluids for Child K were set up by nurses Joanne Williams and Caroline Oakley.
At that time, Lucy Letby was making entries on the notes for one of the babies she was designated nurse for - between 3.02am-3.12am.
At 3.11am, Joanne Williams entered the neonatal unit from the labour ward, Mr Johnson tells the court.

2:44pm
Notes from the transport service say Dr Ravi Jayaram made a call to them at 3.15am, to arrange transport for Child K, to a level 3 hospital. At this time, Lucy Letby was giving medication to a baby she was a designated nurse for in room 2.

2:49pm
At 3.30am, Letby recorded observations for that room 2 baby.
Also at that time, "a lot of things were being recorded", Mr Johnson says. Letby signed for morphine for Child K with Joanne Williams. The morphine was a painkiller and sedation. It was to be given as Child K had been intubated, Mr Johnson tells the court.
It is so they don't interfere with the tube, he adds.

2:53pm
Joanne Williams records the vital signs for Child K at 3.30am.
Just before 3.40am, Caroline Oakley was away from the unit as, at 3.40am, there is a digital record of her coming back into the unit.
Nursery nurse Valerie Thomas, looking after babies in rooms 3 and 4, was out of the unit, as again there is a record of her returning to the unit at 3.40am.

2:55pm
At about that time, Dr Ravi Jayaram is recorded as communicating with the transport team, being on the phone at the nurses' station.
It was about this time that Child K collapsed, Mr Johnson tells the court.
The allegation, he says, is "straightforward".

2:57pm
He says Joanne Williams had left the neonatal unit at this time to see Child K's mother, having left Child K ventilated and sedated.
Dr Jayaram was "distracted" and other nurses were out of the unit.
"That would leave Sophie Ellis and Lucy Letby in the unit covering four nurseries," Mr Johnson added.
While Joanne Williams was out of room 1, Lucy Letby was in there on her own. That is what Dr Jayaram saw when he went in there at the time of the collapse, Mr Johnson says.

3:00pm
Mr Johnson says Child K was connected to a machine checking her heart rate and oxygen levels. Those machines should have alarmed if there was an issue, but they did not. Someone had disabled them, Mr Johnson says.
"Not only that, but Lucy Letby was doing nothing.
"We say that in those circumstances, the only reasonable thing for a nurse to have done was to call for help and/or use the Neopuff to breathe for the child."
The ET Tube had become displaced, Mr Johnson says.
"The fact Lucy Letby was doing nothing and the alarm was not sounding was...that Letby... the convicted murderer, had displaced the tube."

3:01pm
Nursing notes, written retrospectively by Joanne Williams, said Child K had begun to desaturate to "dangerous" levels.
Child K's ET Tube was "dislodged". It was removed and she was reintubated on the second attempt.
Mr Johnson asks the issue is how did the tube become dislodged.

3:05pm
Child K was given a loading dose of morphine "to guard against the possibility that this very premature child had wriggled to extubate herself".
The morphine dose and infusion administration were timed at 3.50am. It is initialled 'JW', but in the handwriting of Lucy Letby.
"Lucy Letby had been caught virtually red-handed by Dr Jayaram," Mr Johnson says, adding that Child K's ET Tube later dislodged twice more, and the evidence establishes that Lucy Letby was there, even though the babies she was to look after were in room 2.

3:07pm
Lucy Letby "became closely involved" with Child K's care "despite" having primary responsibility in room 2.
She was "making [Child K] part of her business", Mr Johnson tells the jury.
At 4.20am Letby cosigned for medication for Child K while Joanne Williams was coming from the labour ward.
About 20 minutes later, medication was given to Child K by Lucy Letby and Caroline Oakley.
Between 4.48am and 5.07am, Child K's designated nurse was completing nursing notes for the baby girl. While that was happening, Lucy Letby and Caroline Oakley were giving further medication to Child K.
At 5.23am, Letby was again involved.

3:08pm
At 5.53am, a note from the transport team recorded Dr Jayaram was keen to get Child K to Arrowe Park Hospital. It was noted: 'keen not to miss window of opportunity whilst baby stable'.

3:14pm
Between 6.04am-6.10am, Letby formally booked in Child K to the neonatal unit on the computer system.
In the checklist is the care of an ET Tube.
Much of the computerised record is taken from a handwritten form. Mr Johnson says the handwritten notes are kept with the baby by the incubator.
Mr Johnson: "She would have had to get the records for [Child K] from the incubator. Once she had completed that, she would have had to return the handwritten records to the incubator."

3:15pm
During that time, recorded at 6.07am and 23 seconds, an X-ray is taken of Child K, by radiographer Anne Kember, using a mobile machine. The x-ray was taken in nursery room 1.
A video, demonstrating how an intubated baby has an x-ray taken by the mobile machine, is played to the court.

3:21pm
The X-ray reports 'ET Tube in satisfactory position'.
It adds: 'NG Tube [feeding tube] in satisfactory position with its tip in the gastric body'.
Mr Johnson says the time the x-ray is recorded may not be accurate.
At 6.09am, Anne Kember is recorded as entering the neonatal unit. He says the process of the x-ray takes about 10-15 minutes, which means the x-ray happened at about 6.20am.
Within a few minutes of that, the ET Tube was dislodged again.
Mr Johnson says that Lucy Letby was trying to create the impression that Child K, "heavily sedated", had dislodged her own tube.

3:26pm
The third desaturation happened at the time of the handover to the day shift.
A nursing colleague was the shift leader at this time. As she came in, she heard a call for help from Lucy Letby, who was not the designated nurse for Child K.
Letby was at the incubator of Child K in nursery room 1.

3:29pm
The day shift leader, Dr Jayaram, Mel Taylor and nurse Williams went in. The issue was the ET Tube was too far in - by 1.5cm, or about 20% too far in.
The ET Tube was withdrawn and Child K picked up immediately, Mr Johnson says.
He adds this [Child K's ET Tube being dislodged] was the same problem, twice after Dr Jayaram had witnessed it.
"We say that is coincidences too far," Mr Johnson tells the court.
He says Letby had tried to "create the impression" Child K had a problem.

3:31pm
Mr Johnson says Child K was moved to the transport incubator at noon, then handed over to the team taking her to Arrowe Park at 12.25pm.

3:33pm
Later that day, Letby replied to a text by a nursing colleague, saying: "25wkr delivered so fairly busy".
Child K died at Arrowe Park Hospital on February 20. Mr Johnson says the prosecution do not say what Lucy Letby did caused Child K's death.
On April 20, 2018, at 11.56pm, Letby searched on Facebook for the surname of Child K.

3:34pm
Mr Johnson says that "has significance" when taken in conjunction with Letby's other Facebook searches for parents of babies she killed.

3:36pm
Mr Johnson says the case may come down to a single issue - 'do you believe Dr Jayaram saying what he saw? Do you believe he is telling you the truth about what he saw? And if you do, do you accept what we allege Lucy Letby was trying to do, bearing in mind what we have also proved.'

3:37pm
That concludes the prosecution opening.

3:38pm
Benjamin Myers KC, for Letby's defence, now gives the opening statement for the defence.
He acknowledges the sympathy for the family of Child K, and recognises the loss of Child K.
"Nothing I do or say is intended to diminish that."

3:41pm
Mr Myers says "it could be very easy for some people to approach" that Lucy Letby "must be guilty" or, 'equally as bad', that they "don't care if she is guilty or not".
He says if that was the case, the idea of a fair trial would be gone.
He adds this trial jury does not feature such people. He says they are to give a true verdict on the evidence, not one of emotional reaction, or of sympathy, or of anything heard outside the courtroom.
"A fair trial on the basis of the evidence is what this is all about."

3:45pm
Mr Myers says he wished to identify "key issues" for the defence, and this is "an outline", and will not be the same length as the prosecution opening.
He says the defence speech will come after the evidence is heard in the trial.
He adds there is no record of exactly where Dr Ravi Jayaram was or what he was doing at the time Child K desaturated.

3:48pm
He says there are three areas, focusing on aspects of the case, for jurors to keep in mind.
The first is how fragile Child K was, clinically. He says any baby born under 37 weeks is classed as premature. At 25 weeks, Child K was "extremely premature".
He says ideally, Child K would not have been born at the Countess, but at a level 3 unit, providing the most intense and specialised level of care. He says that could not be done as doctors caring for the mother concluded the risk transferring her to a suitable unit was "too great".
The Countess was "not the level of unit designed" to care for the prematurity of the baby.

3:51pm
The second area is the problems of care, including intubation.
He says Child K was struggling to breathe from the start of life, and was unable to breathe unaided, which he says "sadly, is unsurprising", given the level of her prematurity.
He says it is known Child K suffered an oxygen desaturation between 3.45am-3.50am. A reason for that would be the ET Tube moved.
He says the prosecution allegation is Letby deliberately moved the tubing. The defence case is Letby did not do that, and "has been blamed wrongly".

3:54pm
Mr Myers says they will look at how realistic the prosecution's theories are, that Letby deliberately dislodged the ET Tube multiple times, during the trial.
He says the third factor is to look at what people said and did at the time, and to decide whether that is consistent with what the prosecution now allege, in particular Dr Ravi Jayaram.

3:58pm
Mr Myers says Dr Jayaram was the lead clinician on the unit that night, the senior doctor with overall responsibility.
Mr Myers outlines Dr Jayaram's account, that he suspect the tube had been deliberately dislodged, and the alarm was not sounding.
He says Lucy Letby does not remember specifically the events of that night. He says in the background of caring for hundreds of babies, that is "hardly surprising, if she did nothing wrong".
He says the case comes to a "pretty stark issue", that Child K desaturated because Lucy Letby interfered with the ET Tube, or not.
That depends on whether Dr Jayaram's account is true and accurate, or not. He says if it is not, the jury cannot convict.
He says the prosecution and defence are in agreement that the evidence of Dr Jayaram is crucial.

4:00pm
Mr Myers says Letby is not guilty of this allegation. He refers to the previous convictions.
"It is important these convictions do not prove this allegation".

4:01pm
He says however much dramatic impact those previous convictions have, it is crucial that the jury looks on the evidence that happened on February 17, 2016.
He says that evidence "does not support what has been alleged".

4:05pm
That completes the opening statements.
Trial judge Mr Justice James Goss asks if the main 12 members of the jury are able to continue to serve as jurors. They agree.
The two reserve jurors, who have been present today, are released back into the general pool of jurors. They are urged, to preserve the integrity of the trial, that they do not speak about the case to any of the 12 jurors about the case until the trial is all over.
He says the same applies to the 12, not to speak to the two reserve jurors, or anyone else, about the case.

4:07pm
That concludes today's case before the jury, and they are to return to court on Thursday at 10.30am.
He reminds them the case will not be sitting on Friday. Additionally, the case will not be heard before noon on Monday, June 17.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
48
Guests online
2,090
Total visitors
2,138

Forum statistics

Threads
602,246
Messages
18,137,476
Members
231,281
Latest member
omnia
Back
Top